Re: [46763] trunk/dports/kde

2009-02-12 Thread O
On Thu, Feb 12, 2009 at 4:05 PM, Ryan Schmidt wrote: > > On Feb 12, 2009, at 06:55, illogic...@macports.org wrote: > >> Revision: 46763 >> http://trac.macports.org/changeset/46763 >> Author: illogic...@macports.org >> Date: 2009-02-12 04:55:50 -0800 (Thu, 12 Feb 2009) >> Log Message

Re: Ports recommending other ports

2009-02-12 Thread Ryan Schmidt
On Feb 13, 2009, at 01:10, Bradley Giesbrecht wrote: I don't know how macports handles upgrades with respect to etc file changes but gentoo has a nice "etc-update" program that allows you replace, merge or ignore etc config files. This CAN be important. But gentoo portage is also managing

Re: Ports recommending other ports

2009-02-12 Thread Bradley Giesbrecht
I don't know how macports handles upgrades with respect to etc file changes but gentoo has a nice "etc-update" program that allows you replace, merge or ignore etc config files. This CAN be important. But gentoo portage is also managing the "world" and thankfully we have Apple taking care

Re: Webserver ports

2009-02-12 Thread Ryan Schmidt
On Feb 13, 2009, at 00:54, Bradley Giesbrecht wrote: On Feb 12, 2009, at 8:54 PM, Ryan Schmidt wrote: We could consider totally rearranging the layout of apache2, apache20 and apache to better fit into the standard MacPorts directories. However, at the moment I'm just concerned with making

Re: Webserver ports

2009-02-12 Thread Bradley Giesbrecht
On Feb 12, 2009, at 8:54 PM, Ryan Schmidt wrote: On Feb 12, 2009, at 09:29, Bradley Giesbrecht wrote: I thought /opt/local/apache2 was strange compared to where the majority of other ports park stuff. After dependancy management I think the big advantages of an excellent software manager

Re: Ports recommending other ports

2009-02-12 Thread Ryan Schmidt
On Feb 12, 2009, at 23:13, Joshua Root wrote: Ryan Schmidt wrote: Before we get into too many specifics about how this interactive ncurses interface would look, I'd be more interested in getting some more non-interactive commands added to MacPorts that would provide the information on which

Re: Ports recommending other ports

2009-02-12 Thread Joshua Root
Ryan Schmidt wrote: > Before we get into too many specifics about how this interactive ncurses > interface would look, I'd be more interested in getting some more > non-interactive commands added to MacPorts that would provide the > information on which such an interactive interface would be based.

Re: Ports recommending other ports

2009-02-12 Thread Ryan Schmidt
On Feb 12, 2009, at 20:58, Bradley Giesbrecht wrote: Thanks for the ascii. Let me borrow it. variants [ ] mysql Enable MySQL support for the connector function. [ ] universal Build Universal Binaries [X] SSL Support SSL connections Other port that work well with [ ]

Re: Webserver ports

2009-02-12 Thread Ryan Schmidt
On Feb 12, 2009, at 09:29, Bradley Giesbrecht wrote: I thought /opt/local/apache2 was strange compared to where the majority of other ports park stuff. After dependancy management I think the big advantages of an excellent software manager (port) is the logical and consistent layout and n

port info long description not formatted correctly in trunk

2009-02-12 Thread Ryan Schmidt
We have a regression from 1.7.0 on trunk when the ${description} variable is included in the long_description. Now, it's surrounded by curly braces, but this was not the case with 1.7.0. I filed a bug here: http://trac.macports.org/ticket/18482 Perhaps someone knows how to fix this. _

Re: Ports recommending other ports

2009-02-12 Thread Bradley Giesbrecht
On Feb 12, 2009, at 4:24 PM, Jordan K. Hubbard wrote: On Feb 12, 2009, at 3:00 PM, Bradley Giesbrecht wrote: On Feb 12, 2009, at 2:44 PM, Jordan K. Hubbard wrote: On Feb 12, 2009, at 12:42 PM, Perry Lee wrote: `make config` displays a menu from which you can select build options (sort

Re: Ports recommending other ports

2009-02-12 Thread Jordan K. Hubbard
On Feb 12, 2009, at 12:42 PM, Perry Lee wrote: `make config` displays a menu from which you can select build options (sorta like MacPorts' variants). `make config install` shows the menu then starts the installation right after. "config" is already pretty close to "configure", which MacPo

JRuby 1.1.6 port update forgotten?

2009-02-12 Thread Josh Price
What's the best way to get this 2 month old ticket closed? https://trac.macports.org/ticket/17699 Thanks in advance, Josh ___ macports-dev mailing list macports-dev@lists.macosforge.org http://lists.macosforge.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/macports-dev

Re: [46759] trunk/dports/databases/postgresql7/Portfile

2009-02-12 Thread Ryan Schmidt
On Feb 12, 2009, at 06:06, m...@macports.org wrote: Revision: 46759 http://trac.macports.org/changeset/46759 Author: m...@macports.org Date: 2009-02-12 04:06:51 -0800 (Thu, 12 Feb 2009) Log Message: --- version 7.4.24, add warning about Mac OS X Intel incompatibility to

Re: [46763] trunk/dports/kde

2009-02-12 Thread Ryan Schmidt
On Feb 12, 2009, at 06:55, illogic...@macports.org wrote: Revision: 46763 http://trac.macports.org/changeset/46763 Author: illogic...@macports.org Date: 2009-02-12 04:55:50 -0800 (Thu, 12 Feb 2009) Log Message: --- Re-add new port choqok. The "alias" part is actually req

Re: Ports recommending other ports

2009-02-12 Thread Perry Lee
On Feb 12, 2009, at 12:38 PM, Ryan Schmidt wrote: I'm not familiar with FreeBSD ports... what does "make config" or "make config install" do? `make config` displays a menu from which you can select build options (sorta like MacPorts' variants). `make config install` shows the menu then st

Re: Fetching and compiling two sources in a single Portfile

2009-02-12 Thread Ryan Schmidt
On Feb 12, 2009, at 03:17, Jean-Michel Pouré wrote: On Thu, 2009-02-12 at 09:24 +0100, Rainer Müller wrote: A solution would be to create mlt-c and mlt-cxx and let mlt depend on both. In fact, most applications depend on mlt++. mlt++ depends on mlt. So installing Kdenlive would install mlt++

Re: Ports recommending other ports

2009-02-12 Thread Ryan Schmidt
On Feb 12, 2009, at 09:42, Bradley Giesbrecht wrote: I really like freebsd ports "make config" or "make config install". Could be "port config install". Simple and effective. I'm not familiar with FreeBSD ports... what does "make config" or "make config install" do? ___

Re: Webserver ports

2009-02-12 Thread Blair Zajac
On Feb 12, 2009, at 2:29 AM, Ryan Schmidt wrote: I think our web server ports are a bit of a mess. We have apache, apache2, apache20 and lighttpd, that I know of. They each have their default htdocs and cgi-bin directories in different places: One should ignore the apache20 port unless one

Re: Ports recommending other ports

2009-02-12 Thread Bradley Giesbrecht
On Feb 12, 2009, at 12:30 AM, Thomas de Grivel wrote: 2009/2/10 Jeremy Lavergne : Let me reword this, as I meant to question, "What happens when the recommended variants conflict?" I think these are just recommendations, or suggestions. In the end the user should be the one to decide. But ac

Re: Webserver ports

2009-02-12 Thread Bradley Giesbrecht
On Feb 12, 2009, at 2:29 AM, Ryan Schmidt wrote: I think our web server ports are a bit of a mess. We have apache, apache2, apache20 and lighttpd, that I know of. They each have their default htdocs and cgi-bin directories in different places: apache: ${prefix}/var/www/data/data (weird), $

Webserver ports

2009-02-12 Thread Ryan Schmidt
I think our web server ports are a bit of a mess. We have apache, apache2, apache20 and lighttpd, that I know of. They each have their default htdocs and cgi-bin directories in different places: apache: ${prefix}/var/www/data/data (weird), ${prefix}/var/www/cgi-bin apache +apache_layout: ${pr

Re: Fetching and compiling two sources in a single Portfile

2009-02-12 Thread Jean-Michel Pouré
On Thu, 2009-02-12 at 09:24 +0100, Rainer Müller wrote: > A solution would be to create mlt-c and mlt-cxx and let mlt depend on > both. In fact, most applications depend on mlt++. mlt++ depends on mlt. So installing Kdenlive would install mlt++ and trigger installation of mlt. Like this is the cas

Re: Ports recommending other ports

2009-02-12 Thread Thomas de Grivel
2009/2/10 Jeremy Lavergne : > Let me reword this, as I meant to question, "What happens when the > recommended variants conflict?" I think these are just recommendations, or suggestions. In the end the user should be the one to decide. But actually I do not want to divert us from the original prop

Re: Fetching and compiling two sources in a single Portfile

2009-02-12 Thread Rainer Müller
Jean-Michel Pouré wrote: > Under GNU/Linux, MLT and MLT++ are two seperate packages. MLT++ providse > C++ wrapping for MLT libraries. If these are distributed as separate packages it might be for a reason. A quick check in other distributions shows they all have this separated. > Maybe this cou

Fetching and compiling two sources in a single Portfile

2009-02-12 Thread Jean-Michel Pouré
Dear Friends, Under GNU/Linux, MLT and MLT++ are two seperate packages. MLT++ providse C++ wrapping for MLT libraries. Maybe this could be provided as one single package in MacPorts. Could you outline examples explaining how to fetch two sources in one single package? Kind regards, Jean-Miche