On Mar 11, 2009, at 9:11 PM, Daniel J. Luke wrote:
If the only benefit is keeping older applications running even when
newer libs change the ABI or API and the older application can't be
updated to use the new lib, then I don't see how the extra
complication of having every version around
On Mar 11, 2009, at 8:25 PM, Jordan K. Hubbard wrote:
or port foo could just statically link to version X of the library
and port blah can statically (or dynamically) link to version Y.
(the build process for port foo could even build the old version X
lib).
That wouldn't work as a general
On Mar 11, 2009, at 1:47 PM, Daniel J. Luke wrote:
On Mar 11, 2009, at 4:04 PM, Jordan K. Hubbard wrote:
More to the point, there are already scenarios today (and far more
in FreeBSD's ports collection, where the efforts to address this
have taken on an increasingly desperate and hacky natu
Okay, I am going to fix that. I think, I can supply a patch tomorrow.
Regards,
Uwe
On Wed, Mar 11, 2009 at 10:43 PM, Ryan Schmidt wrote:
> On Mar 11, 2009, at 13:48, s...@macports.org wrote:
>
> Revision: 47962
>> http://trac.macports.org/changeset/47962
>> Author: s...@macports.org
Ryan Schmidt wrote:
>
> On Mar 11, 2009, at 16:29, mcalh...@macports.org wrote:
>
>> Revision: 47969
>> http://trac.macports.org/changeset/47969
>> Author: mcalh...@macports.org
>> Date: 2009-03-11 14:29:23 -0700 (Wed, 11 Mar 2009)
>> Log Message:
>> ---
>> jpeg: Prevent l
Ryan Schmidt writes:
>
> > +
> > +# Reorder link flags so that so that local -L options come
> > first (especially before -L${prefix}/lib)
> > +# (see http://trac.macports.org/ticket/16411).
> > +reinplace "s|\\(.*\\)\\(\$(LDFLAGS)\\)\\(.*\\)\\(\$(LDLIBS)\\)\
> > \(.*\\)|\\1\\4
On Mar 11, 2009, at 16:29, mcalh...@macports.org wrote:
Revision: 47969
http://trac.macports.org/changeset/47969
Author: mcalh...@macports.org
Date: 2009-03-11 14:29:23 -0700 (Wed, 11 Mar 2009)
Log Message:
---
jpeg: Prevent linker from finding wrong library and header f
On Mar 11, 2009, at 13:48, s...@macports.org wrote:
Revision: 47962
http://trac.macports.org/changeset/47962
Author: s...@macports.org
Date: 2009-03-11 11:48:05 -0700 (Wed, 11 Mar 2009)
Log Message:
---
created argus-clients, ticket #18792
[snip]
+default_variants +gr
On Mar 11, 2009, at 4:04 PM, Jordan K. Hubbard wrote:
More to the point, there are already scenarios today (and far more
in FreeBSD's ports collection, where the efforts to address this
have taken on an increasingly desperate and hacky nature) where you
simply cannot have two desired ports i
Sounds like a good time to get sqlite support running.
+1
This is a much more manageable task that will have tangible benefits.
Although it'd probably be rolled into something else, because I don't
think it's a whole summer's worth of work - probably a week for a
sufficiently motivated individu
On Wed, Mar 11, 2009 at 13:06, Jeremy Lavergne
wrote:
> Sounds like a good time to get sqlite support running.
+1
This is a much more manageable task that will have tangible benefits.
Although it'd probably be rolled into something else, because I don't
think it's a whole summer's worth of work
Jeremy Lavergne wrote:
>>> This project of course requires the ability to depend on specific
>>> version ranges of ports (being able to exclude both too old and too
>>> new), and likewise with variants. There would also need to be a way to
>>> manage rebuilds when existing software would work with
Jordan K. Hubbard wrote:
>
> On Mar 11, 2009, at 5:21 AM, Joshua Root wrote:
>
>> This was one of Jordan's crazy ideas IIRC, and there's a reason it's
>> classified as very challenging. The idea, as I understand it, is that
>> you wouldn't be able to uninstall the old version when something is
>>
This project of course requires the ability to depend on specific
version ranges of ports (being able to exclude both too old and too
new), and likewise with variants. There would also need to be a way
to
manage rebuilds when existing software would work with a newer
version,
and you want to
On Mar 11, 2009, at 5:21 AM, Joshua Root wrote:
This was one of Jordan's crazy ideas IIRC, and there's a reason it's
classified as very challenging. The idea, as I understand it, is that
you wouldn't be able to uninstall the old version when something is
linked against it.
Correct, though I d
On Mar 10, 2009, at 12:28 PM, Jeremy Lavergne wrote:
Is it possible that we can implement a "download all" option for
tickets?
I know it's a minority to find a port with 13 files involved, but
often enough there is at least 1 additional file. Having to click
through and download each on
On Mar 11, 2009, at 11:43 AM, Eric Hall wrote:
On Wed, Mar 11, 2009 at 11:29:35AM -0700, Bradley Giesbrecht wrote:
On Mar 10, 2009, at 5:24 PM, Eric Hall wrote:
[snip]
I've attached a set of patches to:
http://trac.macports.org/ticket/12950#comment:14
for testing.
On Wed, Mar 11, 2009 at 11:29:35AM -0700, Bradley Giesbrecht wrote:
>
> On Mar 10, 2009, at 5:24 PM, Eric Hall wrote:
>
> >[snip]
> >
> > I've attached a set of patches to:
> >
> > http://trac.macports.org/ticket/12950#comment:14
> >
> > for testing. So far so good for me.
>
> I'm t
On Mar 10, 2009, at 5:24 PM, Eric Hall wrote:
[snip]
I've attached a set of patches to:
http://trac.macports.org/ticket/12950#comment:14
for testing. So far so good for me.
I'm testing your patches now.
Small point. Looks like you want to change the patchfile name
Jeremy Lavergne wrote:
> How familiar are they with the languages we use in MacPorts?
Okay, that would be:
* How much experience do you have with Tcl and C?
In my opinion, having experience with Tcl is a weak criterion. There is
the community bonding period (about 4 weeks) during which students
On Mar 11, 2009, at 10:13 AM, Bradley Giesbrecht wrote:
On Mar 10, 2009, at 5:24 PM, Eric Hall wrote:
[snip]
I've attached a set of patches to:
http://trac.macports.org/ticket/12950#comment:14
for testing. So far so good for me.
Is anyone else having difficulty
On Mar 10, 2009, at 5:24 PM, Eric Hall wrote:
[snip]
I've attached a set of patches to:
http://trac.macports.org/ticket/12950#comment:14
for testing. So far so good for me.
Is anyone else having difficulty downloading these patches?
http://trac.macports.org/attach
Rainer Müller wrote:
> MacPorts will apply to be one of the mentoring organizations. The
> students can propose their project ideas to us and we will choose the
> most appealing applications.
For the students application, I added the following additional questions
to be required:
* What are you
MacPorts wrote:
> #16372: version update request psycopg2 2.0.5.1 --> 2.0.7x
> +---
> Reporter: jbus...@… | Owner: land...@…
> Type: enhancement | Status: new
Rainer Müller wrote:
> Rainer Müller wrote:
>> Also, if you have a specific idea what could be improved in MacPorts,
>> but you never had the time to do it yourself, please put a proposal on
>> our ideas page. I already cleared up the list from the last year and
>> there are still interesting and i
Rainer Müller wrote:
> Also, if you have a specific idea what could be improved in MacPorts,
> but you never had the time to do it yourself, please put a proposal on
> our ideas page. I already cleared up the list from the last year and
> there are still interesting and important projects on it. An
26 matches
Mail list logo
