On Mar 28, 2009, at 9:30 PM, Rainer Müller wrote:
Ryan Schmidt wrote:
On Mar 28, 2009, at 13:06, William Siegrist wrote:
I will be installing a spam plugin for Trac next week.
It's sad that this kind of thing is necessary. :(
I am wondering how http://trac.edgewall.com does it. They even
Ryan Schmidt wrote:
> On Mar 28, 2009, at 13:06, William Siegrist wrote:
>> I will be installing a spam plugin for Trac next week.
>
> It's sad that this kind of thing is necessary. :(
I am wondering how http://trac.edgewall.com does it. They even allow
anonymous edits, so if there are spammers o
On Mar 28, 2009, at 4:04 PM, Ryan Schmidt wrote:
On Mar 28, 2009, at 13:06, William Siegrist wrote:
I've cleaned it up for now.
Thanks. Could you also kill:
http://trac.macports.org/ticket/7720#comment:10
Done... There is a plugin which would help admins manage tickets/
comments, but la
Begin forwarded message:
From: Marc Chantreux
Date: March 28, 2009 11:06:03 CDT
To: Ryan Schmidt
Subject: Re: cpan2port
On Sat, Mar 28, 2009 at 04:58:41AM -0500, Ryan Schmidt wrote:
Thanks. It builds, so I added it to the ports tree.
cool :)
$ cpan2port -r Mac::InternetConfig
Unknown op
The MacPorts Project is proud to announce the release of version 1.7.1.
This is a bugfix release with small changes only.
Notable changes for end users:
- port upgrade will no longer act on ports which are not installed
Notable changes for port authors:
- port lint no longer requires master_s
On Mar 28, 2009, at 5:10 PM, Jeff Johnson wrote:
I'm saying that you were largely honking the same Newer! Better!
Bestest!
themes 5+ years ago.
Hurm. If that was your take-away from this, then I somehow
*seriously* failed to make my point, both 5+ years ago and now. I am
not asking, n
On Mar 28, 2009, at 8:03 PM, Jordan K. Hubbard wrote:
So, in order to "grant my wish", you're saying that you have also
accepted the Religion Of The Four Criteria into your heart and will
next start contributing some MacPorts code to accomplish this?
Huzzah! I can hardly wait! :-)
N
On Mar 28, 2009, at 12:55 PM, Jeff Johnson wrote:
My definition of "completed" from the perspective of "Packages
delivered by the MacPorts project using some hardware that Apple
donated for the purpose" would be:
I see. So the 2700+ packages I built from darwinports on several
occaisio
On Mar 28, 2009, at 13:06, William Siegrist wrote:
I've cleaned it up for now.
Thanks. Could you also kill:
http://trac.macports.org/ticket/7720#comment:10
I will be installing a spam plugin for Trac next week.
It's sad that this kind of thing is necessary. :(
What will the plugin do? W
Jordan K. Hubbard wrote:
This would still require someone to choose/write the "pkg" program,
and then make all invocations of "install" go through this layer...
Yep! That's the basic idea.
Unfortunately choosing an existing program (such as rpm) means that
it isn't optimally built for the
Marcus Calhoun-Lopez wrote:
> Apparently it depends on which sourceforge mirror the file is download from.
> The server http://voxel.dl.sourceforge.net/lcms seems to be fast but wrong
> so a bad file keeps being downloaded.
I got it from switch.*, mesh.* and kent.* with the wrong checksum.
Is it
Joshua Root writes:
>
> The checksums don't match for lcms after r48768.
>
> - Josh
>
Apparently it depends on which sourceforge mirror the file is download from.
The server http://voxel.dl.sourceforge.net/lcms seems to be fast but wrong
so a bad file keeps being downloaded.
I will remove so
On Mar 28, 2009, at 3:44 PM, Jordan K. Hubbard wrote:
On Mar 28, 2009, at 12:16 PM, Jeff Johnson wrote:
On Mar 28, 2009, at 2:59 PM, Jordan K. Hubbard wrote:
I don't know if "popular" would be the word I would use. Neither
solution has ever actually been *completed* would be a more
On Mar 28, 2009, at 12:16 PM, Jeff Johnson wrote:
On Mar 28, 2009, at 2:59 PM, Jordan K. Hubbard wrote:
I don't know if "popular" would be the word I would use. Neither
solution has ever actually been *completed* would be a more
accurate statement, so the resulting popularity of said
The checksums don't match for lcms after r48768.
- Josh
___
macports-dev mailing list
macports-dev@lists.macosforge.org
http://lists.macosforge.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/macports-dev
On Mar 28, 2009, at 2:59 PM, Jordan K. Hubbard wrote:
I don't know if "popular" would be the word I would use. Neither
solution has ever actually been *completed* would be a more accurate
statement, so the resulting popularity of said solution is
impossible to gauge. The MacPorts proj
On Mar 28, 2009, at 5:21 AM, Anders F Björklund wrote:
Jordan K. Hubbard wrote:
It would be nice[er] IMO if a solution could be devised which makes
"port install foo" and "pkg install file:///foo.xar" lead to
exactly the same place. Well, to be even more precise, it would be
nicer still
On Mar 28, 2009, at 10:51 AM, Joshua Root wrote:
Frank Schima wrote:
On Mar 28, 2009, at 2:07 AM, Ryan Schmidt wrote:
Is there a way that I can remove comment spam and the Trac account
that created it? If not, William, can you do so? Thanks.
http://trac.macports.org/ticket/17678#comment:3
Frank Schima wrote:
>
> On Mar 28, 2009, at 2:07 AM, Ryan Schmidt wrote:
>
>> Is there a way that I can remove comment spam and the Trac account
>> that created it? If not, William, can you do so? Thanks.
>>
>> http://trac.macports.org/ticket/17678#comment:3
>
> There's also a few more than just
On Mar 28, 2009, at 2:07 AM, Ryan Schmidt wrote:
Is there a way that I can remove comment spam and the Trac account
that created it? If not, William, can you do so? Thanks.
http://trac.macports.org/ticket/17678#comment:3
There's also a few more than just that suddenly. Presumably the
spamm
Jordan K. Hubbard wrote:
It would be nice[er] IMO if a solution could be devised which makes
"port install foo" and "pkg install file:///foo.xar" lead to
exactly the same place. Well, to be even more precise, it would be
nicer still if "port install foo" simply became a wrapper around
"p
Marc Chantreux wrote:
Ryan Schmidt wrote:
Third, I tried to run the script with no parameters, expecting a
usage
The script appears to want a module Module::Depends but I guess
Mac OS X
doesn't provide this. I don't want to use CPAN to install any
modules in
my Mac OS X perl; I want to us
On Mar 27, 2009, at 08:53, Marc Chantreux wrote:
How would you feel about (me) putting cpan2port into the MacPorts
repository in the contrib section?
I'll appreciate a lot! As i said: you can do everything that is
usefull
for the macport communauty and see my as WTFPL licenced.
Thanks, I
Marc gives his approval to put cpan2port into the MacPorts repository.
Begin forwarded message:
From: Marc Chantreux
Date: March 27, 2009 08:53:32 CDT
To: Ryan Schmidt
Subject: Re: cpan2port
How would you feel about (me) putting cpan2port into the MacPorts
repository in the contrib section
On Mar 27, 2009, at 13:15, Eric Hall wrote:
On Fri, Mar 27, 2009 at 06:23:33AM -0500, Ryan Schmidt wrote:
On Mar 27, 2009, at 06:19, Ryan Schmidt wrote:
Wouldn't you say that no port should ever override the checksum
phase? If there are distfiles, their checksums must be validated,
and if the
Is there a way that I can remove comment spam and the Trac account
that created it? If not, William, can you do so? Thanks.
http://trac.macports.org/ticket/17678#comment:3
___
macports-dev mailing list
macports-dev@lists.macosforge.org
http://lists.
26 matches
Mail list logo
