Re: Openssl: built-in or ports?

On 2009-04-03 04:40, Ryan Schmidt wrote: > Here's an idea: we could make a variable mirror.only, being similar > to the existing variable extract.only. If not all files may be > mirrored, you can list the ones that may be mirrored in mirror.only, > or set mirror.only to empty if none may be m

Re: Openssl: built-in or ports?

On Apr 2, 2009, at 12:26, Rainer Müller wrote: On 2009-04-02 19:17, David Evans wrote: For some ports, licensing is dependent on variant selected. For instance, ffmpeg is GPL by default but is LGPL if the +no_gpl variant is specified causing GPL modules to be disabled. Good catch. This wou

-isystem${prefix}/include instead of -I${prefix}/include

Many ports now replace the -I${prefix}/include that MacPorts automatically puts into the CPPFLAGS with -isystem${prefix}/include to work around issues. (freetype ghostscript jpeg pdflib qt4-kde qt4- mac-devel qt4-mac qt4-x11 texlive_base) Should we make this change in MacPorts base? When I

Re: [49051] trunk/dports/devel/openssl/Portfile

On 2009-04-03 01:53, Mark Hattam wrote: > Is this the cause of openssl updating itself tonight with the same > version? > > iMac:~ mark$ sudo port outdated > openssl0.9.8k_0 < 0.9.8k_0 > sqlite33.6.11_0 < 3.6.12_0 Yes, doing a downgrade means we h

Fwd: Including spaces in adduser command

Forwarding to list. Please use Reply All so your reply goes to the list too, not just to me. Anand wrote: 2009/4/2 Ryan Schmidt wrote: On Apr 2, 2009, at 00:39, Bryan Blackburn wrote: On Thu, Apr 02, 2009 at 01:43:45AM +0200, Rainer Müller said: Fixed in r49013 [1] and merged back to r

Fwd: Cleaning up during uninstall and submitting Portfile

Forwarding to list. Please use Reply All so your reply goes to the list too, not just to me. Anand wrote: Ryan wrote: Anand wrote: Actually, this is what I'm already doing. However, at run-time, the package creates files in these directories, so Macports doesn't remove them. That's wh

Re: Including spaces in adduser command

On Apr 2, 2009, at 07:11, Jeremy Lavergne wrote: On Apr 2, 2009, at 5:25 AM, Ryan Schmidt wrote: By all means! :) Maybe not just yet, since we just had 1.7.1. I should think that shouldn't stop us from releasing important updates. I suppose not. There were a few changes I wanted to merg

Re: [48945] trunk/dports/lang/spidermonkey/Portfile

On Apr 2, 2009, at 10:35, Frank Schima wrote: On Apr 2, 2009, at 2:34 AM, Ryan Schmidt wrote: Once epoch has been added to a port, you can never remove it or decrease it. I added it back in in r49041. I didn't know that. Thanks for letting me know and for fixing it! The order of precedence

Re: [49051] trunk/dports/devel/openssl/Portfile

On 2 Apr 2009, at 16:51, Rainer Müller wrote: On 2009-04-02 16:40, Rainer Müller wrote: On 2009-04-02 12:32, m...@macports.org wrote: Revision: 49051 http://trac.macports.org/changeset/49051 Author: m...@macports.org Date: 2009-04-02 03:32:18 -0700 (Thu, 02 Apr 2009) Log Messag

Re: postfix +tls upgrade broken

On 2009-04-03 00:23, Bradley Giesbrecht wrote: > Performing "port selfupdate" followed by "port upgrade outdated" and > my postfix +tls was broken by not finding "/opt/local/lib/libssl. > 0.9.8.dylib". > > Adding a symlink provided a quick fix. I'd like to see postfix > building with this sim

Re: postfix +tls upgrade broken

Hi Brad, it seems like you have been affected by the openssl-1.0.0-beta1 update. This update has been reverted since it broke some ports. A 'port sync' and subsequent update of openssl should fix the issue /max On Fri, Apr 3, 2009 at 12:23 AM, Bradley Giesbrecht wrote: > Performing "port selfupd

postfix +tls upgrade broken

Performing "port selfupdate" followed by "port upgrade outdated" and my postfix +tls was broken by not finding "/opt/local/lib/libssl. 0.9.8.dylib". Adding a symlink provided a quick fix. I'd like to see postfix building with this simlink "/opt/local/lib/libssl.dylib" instead. libcrypto has

Re: [MacPorts] BadContent added

This is to support a spam filter, please do not actually go to that URL. Thanks -Bill On Apr 2, 2009, at 1:57 PM, MacPorts wrote: Added page "BadContent" by wsiegr...@apple.com from 17.202.44.123* Page URL: Content: ---8 <--8<--8<--8<

Re: Openssl: built-in or ports?

On 2009-04-02 12:56, Ryan Schmidt wrote: > I might just make it as simple as having "port lint" complain if the > port doesn't specify the license. It's not too hard for a port > maintainer to figure out and indicate what the license is, once > they're made aware that they should do so. Of c

Re: [49005] trunk/dports/PortIndex.quick

On Thu, Apr 02, 2009 at 06:36:04AM -0700, William Siegrist said: > On Apr 2, 2009, at 2:26 AM, Ryan Schmidt wrote: > >> >> On Apr 1, 2009, at 14:36, wsiegr...@apple.com wrote: >> >>> Revision: 49005 >>> http://trac.macports.org/changeset/49005 >>> Author: wsiegr...@apple.com >>> Date:

Re: Openssl: built-in or ports?

Either we make two flags, so this would be for mirroring: mirror.restricted yes Or we integrate this into a 'licenses' option: licenses BSD licenses GPL licenses Restricted BSD licenses Restricted NoMirror So multiple licenses can be named if parts are under different licenses, with

Re: Cleaning up during uninstall and submitting Portfile

On Thu, Apr 02, 2009 at 09:55:22AM -0600, Rainer Müller wrote: > > > > with this I have had pkg_uninstall working for a few years - unfortunately > > the name change > > from darwinports to macports made life difficult for me (running on Panther > > at the time > > and only recently upgrading to

Re: Openssl: built-in or ports?

On 2009-04-02 19:17, David Evans wrote: > For some ports, licensing is dependent on variant selected. For > instance, ffmpeg > is GPL by default but is LGPL if the +no_gpl variant is specified > causing GPL modules to be disabled. Good catch. > This would work in these cases if it is acceptabl

Re: Openssl: built-in or ports?

Rainer Müller wrote: On 2009-04-02 12:54, Ryan Schmidt wrote: Absolutely. We already need a flag for whether distfiles may be distributed. William is currently maintaining that list manually in his mirror script, which isn't optimal. Anyone have a suggestion for what such a flag could be

Re: Openssl: built-in or ports?

On 2009-04-02 12:54, Ryan Schmidt wrote: > Absolutely. We already need a flag for whether distfiles may be > distributed. William is currently maintaining that list manually in > his mirror script, which isn't optimal. Anyone have a suggestion for > what such a flag could be called? Either w

Re: Cleaning up during uninstall and submitting Portfile

On 2009-04-02 16:34, David Osguthorpe wrote: > On Thu, Apr 02, 2009 at 04:11:14AM -0600, Ryan Schmidt wrote: >> On Apr 2, 2009, at 04:51, Anand Buddhdev wrote: >> >> Oh yes, understood. But sorry, no, there is no post-uninstall hook. >> There are several ports where this would be useful, but nobo

Re: [49051] trunk/dports/devel/openssl/Portfile

On 2009-04-02 16:40, Rainer Müller wrote: > On 2009-04-02 12:32, m...@macports.org wrote: >> Revision: 49051 >> http://trac.macports.org/changeset/49051 >> Author: m...@macports.org >> Date: 2009-04-02 03:32:18 -0700 (Thu, 02 Apr 2009) >> Log Message: >> --- >> version 1.0.0

Re: [48945] trunk/dports/lang/spidermonkey/Portfile

On Apr 2, 2009, at 2:34 AM, Ryan Schmidt wrote: On Mar 31, 2009, at 12:06, macsforever2...@macports.org wrote: Revision: 48945 http://trac.macports.org/changeset/48945 Author: macsforever2...@macports.org Date: 2009-03-31 10:06:00 -0700 (Tue, 31 Mar 2009) Log Message:

Re: [49051] trunk/dports/devel/openssl/Portfile

On 2009-04-02 12:32, m...@macports.org wrote: > Revision: 49051 > http://trac.macports.org/changeset/49051 > Author: m...@macports.org > Date: 2009-04-02 03:32:18 -0700 (Thu, 02 Apr 2009) > Log Message: > --- > version 1.0.0-beta1 Is it really wise to upgrade to a beta? Sho

Re: Cleaning up during uninstall and submitting Portfile

On Thu, Apr 02, 2009 at 04:11:14AM -0600, Ryan Schmidt wrote: > On Apr 2, 2009, at 04:51, Anand Buddhdev wrote: > > Oh yes, understood. But sorry, no, there is no post-uninstall hook. > There are several ports where this would be useful, but nobody has > written it yet. > what about the pkg_

Re: [49005] trunk/dports/PortIndex.quick

On Apr 2, 2009, at 2:26 AM, Ryan Schmidt wrote: On Apr 1, 2009, at 14:36, wsiegr...@apple.com wrote: Revision: 49005 http://trac.macports.org/changeset/49005 Author: wsiegr...@apple.com Date: 2009-04-01 12:36:01 -0700 (Wed, 01 Apr 2009) Log Message: --- Mark the PortInd

Re: Including spaces in adduser command

On 2009-04-02 07:39, Bryan Blackburn wrote: > On Thu, Apr 02, 2009 at 01:43:45AM +0200, Rainer Müller said: >> Fixed in r49013 [1] and merged back to release_1_7 in r49014 [2]. > > Does that mean we'll be having a 1.7.2 at some point? Currently trunk is not yet in a state where we can estimate a

Re: Including spaces in adduser command

I should think that shouldn't stop us from releasing important updates. On Apr 2, 2009, at 5:25 AM, Ryan Schmidt wrote: By all means! :) Maybe not just yet, since we just had 1.7.1. smime.p7s Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature ___ macport

Re: Openssl: built-in or ports?

On Apr 1, 2009, at 21:02, Rainer Müller wrote: Having license information would be nice anyway in my opinion, regardless if it will be used for building binaries. It sounds easy to just add a new license field to the Portfile syntax. But the hard part will be to fill it with actual values. Ma

Re: Openssl: built-in or ports?

On Apr 2, 2009, at 01:32, Anders F Björklund wrote: So when we get going on binaries, we're going to have to provide portfile syntax to indicate whether we may distribute binaries of the built thing? Sheesh. It might even need two flags, one for the distfiles and one for the binaries...

Re: Cleaning up during uninstall and submitting Portfile

On Apr 2, 2009, at 04:51, Anand Buddhdev wrote: You need to create the directories inside the destroot so they're registered to the port. Instead of: xinstall -d ${prefix}/somewhere do: xinstall -d ${destroot}${prefix}/somewhere Actually, this is what I'm already doing. However, at run-

Re: Cleaning up during uninstall and submitting Portfile

2009/4/2 Ryan Schmidt Hi Ryan, Thanks for your help with advice on which openssl to use. So I've >> created a Portfile for NSD 3.2.1, placed it in a local ports >> repository, and used it to install the package on my system. The >> package builds, installs and runs just fine. >> >> So when I un

Re: [49005] trunk/dports/PortIndex.quick

On Apr 1, 2009, at 14:36, wsiegr...@apple.com wrote: Revision: 49005 http://trac.macports.org/changeset/49005 Author: wsiegr...@apple.com Date: 2009-04-01 12:36:01 -0700 (Wed, 01 Apr 2009) Log Message: --- Mark the PortIndex.quick as binary to avoid the large diffs Wha

Re: Including spaces in adduser command

On Apr 2, 2009, at 00:39, Bryan Blackburn wrote: On Thu, Apr 02, 2009 at 01:43:45AM +0200, Rainer Müller said: Fixed in r49013 [1] and merged back to release_1_7 in r49014 [2]. Does that mean we'll be having a 1.7.2 at some point? By all means! :) Maybe not just yet, since we just had 1.7

Re: [48945] trunk/dports/lang/spidermonkey/Portfile

On Mar 31, 2009, at 12:06, macsforever2...@macports.org wrote: Revision: 48945 http://trac.macports.org/changeset/48945 Author: macsforever2...@macports.org Date: 2009-03-31 10:06:00 -0700 (Tue, 31 Mar 2009) Log Message: --- Added UTF-8 support. (#18895) Modified Paths:

Re: [49020] trunk/dports/devel/gdb/Portfile

On Apr 1, 2009, at 19:56, dwe...@macports.org wrote: Revision: 49020 http://trac.macports.org/changeset/49020 Author: dwe...@macports.org Date: 2009-04-01 17:56:40 -0700 (Wed, 01 Apr 2009) Log Message: --- -m "tweaks to the configure installation paths" And you added a

Re: [48220] trunk/dports/x11

On Mar 16, 2009, at 21:53, jerem...@macports.org wrote: Revision: 48220 http://trac.macports.org/changeset/48220 Author: jerem...@macports.org Date: 2009-03-16 19:53:23 -0700 (Mon, 16 Mar 2009) Log Message: --- quartz-wm: New port Added Paths: --- trunk/dport