So where is qt4_select? I see it mentioned in qt4-{x11,mac,kde}, and
I see the files in ${prefix}/opt/local/etc/select/qt4, but I don't see
any documentation about how to use them... either as a user or in a
Portfile to ensure a particular flavor.
On Feb 4, 2009, at 14:15, mcalh...@macport
On Mon, Apr 13, 2009 at 10:21:08PM +0200, C. Florian Ebeling said:
> >> So the course of action will be:
> >> 1 rename ruby port to ruby18
> >> 2 create ruby_select port
> >>
> >> I added the suggestion to maybe have another third step:
> >> 3 create port ruby again which is empty mostly, but pulls
On Mon, Apr 13, 2009 at 05:44:33PM +0200, Rainer Müller said:
> Arthur Koziel wrote:
> > Here's how I thought of it (using hashlib as an example):
> >
> > Once the python25 port is updated, the hashlib module will be located
> > one level
> > above the "site-packages" directory. So, all "import
>> So the course of action will be:
>> 1 rename ruby port to ruby18
>> 2 create ruby_select port
>>
>> I added the suggestion to maybe have another third step:
>> 3 create port ruby again which is empty mostly, but pulls select_ruby
>> and symlinks
>> to default version (which ever that is then) Th
On Mon, Apr 13, 2009 at 02:47:11PM +0200, C. Florian Ebeling said:
> In the last couple days Brett Eisenberg, Wataru Kimura and I have been
> discussing
> a few changes to the Ruby ports on private mail, and I wanted to put
> this publicly onto
> the list for dicussion. Nothing earthshaking, but su
I sent this to the wrong list address by mistake, so I'm sending it again.
>I know that your long term goal was to integrate man pages and guide
>together. But I didn't know yet that work already started on this. Now I
>am looking at the man pages in XML format in doc-new/man/xml/* which are
>unto
Arthur Koziel wrote:
> Here's how I thought of it (using hashlib as an example):
>
> Once the python25 port is updated, the hashlib module will be located
> one level
> above the "site-packages" directory. So, all "import hashlib"
> statements would
> result in importing the hashlib module ins
On 13.04.2009, at 15:11, Rainer Müller wrote:
Bryan Blackburn wrote:
It would be nice to move 2.4 and 2.5 (or at least 2.5) to the same
model as
2.6+, but that is quite a bit of work; not to update the python25
port but
to remove all the dependencies which have built up using those
module
Bryan Blackburn wrote:
> It would be nice to move 2.4 and 2.5 (or at least 2.5) to the same model as
> 2.6+, but that is quite a bit of work; not to update the python25 port but
> to remove all the dependencies which have built up using those modules that
> would no longer be needed.
The dependenc
In the last couple days Brett Eisenberg, Wataru Kimura and I have been
discussing
a few changes to the Ruby ports on private mail, and I wanted to put
this publicly onto
the list for dicussion. Nothing earthshaking, but sure worth discussion.
It started with Brett's suggestion to have ruby 1.9 as
On Apr 13, 2009, at 1:00 AM, Ryan Schmidt wrote:
Revision: 49606
http://trac.macports.org/changeset/49606
Author: pe...@macports.org
Date: 2009-04-13 00:40:18 -0700 (Mon, 13 Apr 2009)
Log Message:
---
port1.0/portactivate.tcl - Wrap notes output to the terminal's width.
W
On Apr 13, 2009, at 02:40, pe...@macports.org wrote:
Revision: 49606
http://trac.macports.org/changeset/49606
Author: pe...@macports.org
Date: 2009-04-13 00:40:18 -0700 (Mon, 13 Apr 2009)
Log Message:
---
port1.0/portactivate.tcl - Wrap notes output to the terminal's wid
12 matches
Mail list logo
