On Aug 16, 2009, at 3:42 PM, Ryan Schmidt wrote:
I don't follow... my purpose in uninstalling ports with
port_cutleaves is to free up resources on my system by deleting
things that are no longer needed. If I left archives of these ports
around, I wouldn't be doing a very good job of freeing
On Aug 16, 2009, at 02:34, krisc...@macports.org wrote:
Revision: 55651
http://trac.macports.org/changeset/55651
Author: krisc...@macports.org
Date: 2009-08-16 00:34:11 -0700 (Sun, 16 Aug 2009)
Log Message:
---
new version - which is universal by default - hope I did id t
On Aug 16, 2009, at 09:07, j...@macports.org wrote:
Revision: 55659
http://trac.macports.org/changeset/55659
Author: j...@macports.org
Date: 2009-08-16 07:07:42 -0700 (Sun, 16 Aug 2009)
Log Message:
---
added two dependencies after a user tried to install and found out
M
On Aug 15, 2009, at 09:15, Jeremy Lavergne wrote:
On Aug 15, 2009, at 6:06 AM, Ryan Schmidt wrote:
Cool -- I have that a lot where port_cutleaves says I can
uninstall something, and then I have to build it again the next
day when I install some port.
Archive mode ftw.
I don't follow..
The guide still lists X11 as either a good thing to have (X11 itself) or a
necessity (the X11 SDK); at this point, that should all be removed entirely,
correct, since the xorg ports are always used instead?
Bryan
___
macports-dev mailing list
macports-d
On Aug 16, 2009, at 19:08, Bryan Blackburn wrote:
The guide still lists X11 as either a good thing to have (X11
itself) or a
necessity (the X11 SDK); at this point, that should all be removed
entirely,
correct, since the xorg ports are always used instead?
I think so, but I have not actua
On 2009-8-17 10:08, Bryan Blackburn wrote:
> The guide still lists X11 as either a good thing to have (X11 itself) or a
> necessity (the X11 SDK); at this point, that should all be removed entirely,
> correct, since the xorg ports are always used instead?
I think base 1.7.1 might still want some o
It's still required for /usr/lib/libXplugin.dylib ... but I the guide
still needs to be updated.
On Aug 16, 2009, at 17:08, Bryan Blackburn wrote:
The guide still lists X11 as either a good thing to have (X11
itself) or a
necessity (the X11 SDK); at this point, that should all be removed
e
