Re: [GSoC-2010] MPWA

2010-03-22 Thread William Siegrist
On Mar 22, 2010, at 1:10 PM, Pratul Kalia wrote: > While I'm not very sure about what all the community would need in the > web app, other than in interface to view details on ports and a > possible "online submission of new ports" method, I see 2 possible > approaches to the problem: > - A separ

[GSoC-2010] MPWA

2010-03-22 Thread Pratul Kalia
Hello everyone I've been doing some thinking about the Macports Web Application (MPWA) idea for a couple of days. The original MPWA implementation was done in Ruby on Rails 3 years ago. Unfortunately, that never got to be implemented practically and hasn't been updated either. I had a talk with Ra

Haskell PortGroup Changes

2010-03-22 Thread nox
Le 22 mars 2010 à 12:49, Ryan Schmidt a écrit : > > On Mar 21, 2010, at 14:08, nox wrote: > >> Any haskell port should have a depends_build and depends_run for port:ghc. >> But there is no library to link against in ghc, so it should not be a >> depends_lib. >> >> The depends_run is needed by

patch commit request

2010-03-22 Thread Michael Allman
Hello, The committer of the mercurial port, deric, has not responded to ticket #23958, filed 2 weeks ago. Per the port update policies, would a committer please apply the patch included with that ticket? Thanks, Michael ___ macports-dev mailing

Re: post-deactivate

2010-03-22 Thread nox
Le 22 mars 2010 à 16:15, Joshua Root a écrit : > On 2010-3-23 01:19 , nox wrote: >> Hi, >> >> Is there any progress for a support of post-deactivate hook? >> hs-* ports really need that. > > It works fine in trunk. > > - Josh Nice! Do we have an ETA for the next release? _

Re: [64850] trunk/dports/devel/hs-utf8-string/Portfile

2010-03-22 Thread Joshua Root
On 2010-3-23 01:05 , nox wrote: > Is there a policy for whether we should top- or bottom-reply? :p I don't think we need to declare an official policy. :P Bottom replying is preferable in general, but switching from one to the other mid-thread is what you really want to avoid. - Josh ___

Re: post-deactivate

2010-03-22 Thread Joshua Root
On 2010-3-23 01:19 , nox wrote: > Hi, > > Is there any progress for a support of post-deactivate hook? > hs-* ports really need that. It works fine in trunk. - Josh ___ macports-dev mailing list macports-dev@lists.macosforge.org http://lists.macosforge

post-deactivate

2010-03-22 Thread nox
Hi, Is there any progress for a support of post-deactivate hook? hs-* ports really need that. Regards, Anthony. ___ macports-dev mailing list macports-dev@lists.macosforge.org http://lists.macosforge.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/macports-dev

Re: [64850] trunk/dports/devel/hs-utf8-string/Portfile

2010-03-22 Thread nox
Okay. Is there a policy for whether we should top- or bottom-reply? :p Le 22 mars 2010 à 12:49, Ryan Schmidt a écrit : > > On Mar 21, 2010, at 14:08, nox wrote: > >> Any haskell port should have a depends_build and depends_run for port:ghc. >> But there is no library to link against in ghc, so

Re: [64850] trunk/dports/devel/hs-utf8-string/Portfile

2010-03-22 Thread Ryan Schmidt
On Mar 21, 2010, at 14:08, nox wrote: > Any haskell port should have a depends_build and depends_run for port:ghc. > But there is no library to link against in ghc, so it should not be a > depends_lib. > > The depends_run is needed by the post-activate bits. Ok, then let's make that change in

Re: [64959] trunk/dports/devel/hs-NewBinary/Portfile

2010-03-22 Thread Ryan Schmidt
On Mar 22, 2010, at 05:31, nox wrote: > Le 19 mars 2010 à 14:24, Ryan Schmidt a écrit : >> When Brian designed the haskell portgroup, he appears to have intended for >> the portname to be lowercased, presumably to match how we do perl module >> ports. (Perl module names are mixed-case, but the co

Re: [64959] trunk/dports/devel/hs-NewBinary/Portfile

2010-03-22 Thread nox
I've made that too, for ports like hs-Diff. Le 19 mars 2010 à 14:24, Ryan Schmidt a écrit : > On Mar 19, 2010, at 08:22, Gregory Wright wrote: >> On 3/19/10 9:00 AM, Ryan Schmidt wrote: >>> >>> The lint message in question reads: >>> >>> Error: Portfile directory hs-NewBinary does not match por

Re: Should I remove hs-haskell-src-exts-1.7?

2010-03-22 Thread nox
hs-haskell-src-exts-1.6 Le 22 mars 2010 à 10:01, Ryan Schmidt a écrit : > On Mar 21, 2010, at 12:54, nox wrote: > >> I'm currently writing an update for yi. For this I had to create a port for >> hs-derive. >> I hate to create ports for outdated dependencies so much that if I have to >> really

Re: Should I remove hs-haskell-src-exts-1.7?

2010-03-22 Thread Ryan Schmidt
On Mar 21, 2010, at 12:54, nox wrote: > I'm currently writing an update for yi. For this I had to create a port for > hs-derive. > I hate to create ports for outdated dependencies so much that if I have to > really do it, > I will try to create it for the less outdated version I can link against