On 4/2/10 7:17 AM, Ryan Schmidt wrote:
On Apr 1, 2010, at 09:03, easie...@macports.org wrote:
Revision: 65823
http://trac.macports.org/changeset/65823
Author: easie...@macports.org
Date: 2010-04-01 07:03:34 -0700 (Thu, 01 Apr 2010)
Log Message:
---
Update to hgsvn-0.1.8.
On Apr 1, 2010, at 09:03, easie...@macports.org wrote:
> Revision: 65823
> http://trac.macports.org/changeset/65823
> Author: easie...@macports.org
> Date: 2010-04-01 07:03:34 -0700 (Thu, 01 Apr 2010)
> Log Message:
> ---
> Update to hgsvn-0.1.8.
> Added: trunk/dports/pyth
On Apr 1, 2010, at 7:44 AM, Mark Anderson wrote:
> I have added a PCB Portfile patch that brings it to the latest
> version. Can the maintainer/someone with authority test and commit
> it?
Done in r65847.
-Frank
___
macports-dev mailing list
macpo
On Apr 1, 2010, at 5:59 AM, Titus von Boxberg wrote:
> the committer of port mscgen (landonf) has not responded to update patch
> ticket 23962,
> filed 4 weeks ago.
> Would another committer please apply the patch?
Done in r65846.
-Frank
___
macpor
So the issue remains. I'm stuck being the owner of a ticket I cannot close.
Can someone please either remove me as owner, or give the appropriate
permissions?
On Thu, Apr 1, 2010 at 10:12 AM, Rainer Müller wrote:
> On 2010-03-31 06:23 , Ryan Schmidt wrote:
> > On Mar 30, 2010, at 22:43, Daniel
On 2010-03-31 06:23 , Ryan Schmidt wrote:
> On Mar 30, 2010, at 22:43, Daniel wrote:
>> Also, if people are going to keep assigning me bugs, please give me the
>> ability to close them or mark them fixed.
>
> AFAIK you should have the ability to do so, once you log in to our Trac
> system with t
Hello? I still can't modify the bugs.
On Tue, Mar 30, 2010 at 10:19 PM, Daniel wrote:
> #18759 in particular but I have more. I'm logged in, but I can only "reply"
>
> -d
>
>
> On Tue, Mar 30, 2010 at 9:23 PM, Ryan Schmidt wrote:
>
>>
>> On Mar 30, 2010, at 22:43, Daniel wrote:
>>
>> > seems I o
I have added a PCB Portfile patch that brings it to the latest
version. Can the maintainer/someone with authority test and commit
it?
Mark
___
macports-dev mailing list
macports-dev@lists.macosforge.org
http://lists.macosforge.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/m
I see, thanks a lot!
On 2010/04/01, at 20:36, Ryan Schmidt wrote:
>
> On Apr 1, 2010, at 06:35, takan...@macports.org wrote:
>
>> Revision: 65818
>> http://trac.macports.org/changeset/65818
>> Author: takan...@macports.org
>> Date: 2010-04-01 04:35:22 -0700 (Thu, 01 Apr 2010)
>> L
Hello,
the committer of port mscgen (landonf) has not responded to update patch ticket
23962,
filed 4 weeks ago.
Would another committer please apply the patch?
Thanks!
Regards
Titus
___
macports-dev mailing list
macports-dev@lists.macosforge.org
http
On Apr 1, 2010, at 06:35, takan...@macports.org wrote:
> Revision: 65818
> http://trac.macports.org/changeset/65818
> Author: takan...@macports.org
> Date: 2010-04-01 04:35:22 -0700 (Thu, 01 Apr 2010)
> Log Message:
> ---
> eblook: Increased revision number, because port:eb
On 2010-04-01 09:29 , Ryan Schmidt wrote:
> On Mar 21, 2010, at 12:06, Rainer Müller wrote:
>> But if we want to lower priority, we would only have to add
>> configure.nice/destroot.nice options to portconfigure/portdestroot.
>
> For the benefit of those quirky ports that for whatever reason do
>
On Mar 21, 2010, at 12:06, Rainer Müller wrote:
> On 2010-03-21 11:07 , Ryan Schmidt wrote:
>> Do you suppose it would be nice to use setpriority in other phases as
>> well? There are some ports that, though perhaps they shouldn't,
>> compile in either the configure or destroot phases; perhaps th
13 matches
Mail list logo
