(Moving discussion to macports-dev from macports-users)
On Apr 17, 2010, at 03:49, Scott Haneda wrote:
> This seems to be the most common of the expressions used:
>(\d+(?:\.\d+)*)
> Has that been determined the preferred method of making that match?
I believe that's part of the livecheck.re
On Apr 18, 2010, at 03:26, Ryan Schmidt wrote:
>> Could you walk me through port "mowitz"
>> I look at that Portfile and I see the download url is:
>> http://siag.nu/pub/mowitz/
>> If I go to that url, it is 404, I then combine it all to test it:
>> http://siag.nu/pub/mowitz/Mowitz-0.3.1
>>
On 2010-4-18 12:31 , Ryan Schmidt wrote:
>
> On Apr 17, 2010, at 21:10, rai...@macports.org wrote:
>
>> Avoid catch which masks any error, instead test if the file actually exists
>
> I was gonna ask about this, with regard to the python portgroups. Shouldn't
> we be doing this:
>
>
>
> $ sv
On Apr 18, 2010, at 03:26, Ryan Schmidt wrote:
> On Apr 17, 2010, at 03:49, Scott Haneda wrote:
>
>> Would you mind walking me through your process of one port, so I know how to
>> do this in a fast way.
>
> Ok, let me pick one from my to-do list and see what happens.
Let's do another.
alpha
Here's a simple one where we just need to fix the livecheck.
ample seems to have been updated (port version: 0.5.7, new version: 0.4.0)
I don't find any tickets, the homepage seems to be current, version 0.5.7 is
the latest and was released in 2003. The project is hosted at SourceForge and
uses
Ryan Schmidt wrote:
> Let's do another.
>
> alphamail seems to have been updated (port version: 1.0.16, new version: 1.05)
[snip a tale of shaved yaks]
> That's all I can do for this one for now.
>
> Not sure if any of this is being helpful to you. Each port has its own story
> and its own needs
On 2010-04-18 10:26 , Ryan Schmidt wrote:
> My favorite livecheck which you've probably seen me add to many ports
> is:
>
> livecheck.type regex livecheck.regex ${name}-(\[0-9.\]+)\\.tar
>
> This checks the project's homepage (the default livecheck.url is
> ${homepage}); this works great if they
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Am 18.04.10 04:21, schrieb Ryan Schmidt:
> On Apr 17, 2010, at 17:12, Thomas Keller wrote:
>> Am 18.04.10 00:04, schrieb Rainer Müller:
>>> But I would encourage to use some more recent version of python.
>>> I would choose ${prefix}/bin/python2.6 and
On Apr 18, 2010, at 10:04, Thomas Keller wrote:
> It seems as if py26-gtk needs py26-cairo, which needs py26-numpy, which
> ends up needing gcc43.
True, though py26-numpy has a +no_gcc43 variant you can use if you want to skip
the parts that need a Fortran compiler.
> I went through without ins
On Apr 17, 2010, at 5:48 PM, Ryan Schmidt wrote:
On Apr 17, 2010, at 18:55, Marko Käning wrote:
I was just thinking that it might be helpful to know which ports
are most actively used by the community.
Is there a way to determine how often ports got actually installed?
That would be perh
Just make it opt in.
"Bradley Giesbrecht" wrote:
>
>On Apr 17, 2010, at 5:48 PM, Ryan Schmidt wrote:
>
>>
>> On Apr 17, 2010, at 18:55, Marko Käning wrote:
>>
>>> I was just thinking that it might be helpful to know which ports
>>> are most actively used by the community.
>>>
>>> Is there a wa
On Apr 18, 2010, at 2:51 AM, Ryan Schmidt wrote:
Let's do another.
alphamail seems to have been updated (port version: 1.0.16, new
version: 1.05)
That doesn't look right. Tickets? Yes, one:
http://trac.macports.org/ticket/15383
That ticket updates the port to 1.0.44, so now we know the
On 2010-04-18 18:08 , Bradley Giesbrecht wrote:
> I would like port -v livecheck to report the current mp version and
> the highest source version found although I wouldn't put a much of
> priority on it. But is one were to implement the master_sites patch
> from Rainer maybe consider this en
On 2010-4-19 02:08 , Bradley Giesbrecht wrote:
>
> My experience is that "port livecheck" without -d will report nothing if
> livecheck is invalid for various reason, example distname has changed or
> source repository has moved. I usually do port -d livecheck.
You always get an error message if
On Apr 18, 2010, at 9:59 AM, Joshua Root wrote:
On 2010-4-19 02:08 , Bradley Giesbrecht wrote:
My experience is that "port livecheck" without -d will report
nothing if
livecheck is invalid for various reason, example distname has
changed or
source repository has moved. I usually do port
On Apr 18, 2010, at 12:12, Bradley Giesbrecht wrote:
> On Apr 18, 2010, at 9:59 AM, Joshua Root wrote:
>
>> On 2010-4-19 02:08 , Bradley Giesbrecht wrote:
>>>
>>> My experience is that "port livecheck" without -d will report nothing if
>>> livecheck is invalid for various reason, example distna
> This could be very valuable, if it was determined that what most think is an
> obscure port was heavily used, it could be looked at more closely, and
> perhaps made as perfect as could be as far as ease of install, up to
> date'ness etc.
Yep ...
> My gut tells me Apache, php, and MySql are at
17 matches
Mail list logo
