Re: qt4-select makes symlink to nothing

2010-07-01 Thread Michael Dickens
I know where you're coming from on doing selfupdate :) Somehow your MacPorts install has an incorrect 'base' file. Maybe I need to bump the revision in case there are others out there with your issue? % sudo port -f uninstall qt4_select % sudo port install qt4_select % sudo qt4_select none % sud

Re: qt4-select makes symlink to nothing

2010-07-01 Thread Jeremy Lavergne
> The "base" file is not the correct size; it should be 3356 bytes. That'll > make a difference! Maybe your ports tree is out of date? "port installed > qt4_select" should return "qt4_select @0.3_1 (active)". I'm a bit religious on the selfupdate :-) I do have qt4_select @0.3_1 (active).

Re: qt4-select makes symlink to nothing

2010-07-01 Thread Michael Dickens
The "base" file is not the correct size; it should be 3356 bytes. That'll make a difference! Maybe your ports tree is out of date? "port installed qt4_select" should return "qt4_select @0.3_1 (active)". On Thu, 01 Jul 2010 18:37 -0400, "Jeremy Lavergne" wrote: > > $ ls -l /opt/local/etc/select

Re: qt4-select makes symlink to nothing

2010-07-01 Thread Jeremy Lavergne
> $ ls -l /opt/local/bin/qmake lrwxr-xr-x 1 root admin 36 Jul 1 15:34 /opt/local/bin/qmake -> /opt/local/libexec/qt4-mac/bin/qmake > $ ls -ld /opt/local/etc/select/qt4* drwxr-xr-x 7 root admin 238 Jul 1 15:33 /opt/local/etc/select/qt4 > $ ls -l /opt/local/etc/select/qt4 -rw-r--r-- 2

Getting other portfile's header / library paths inside another?

2010-07-01 Thread Michael Dickens
Is there a way -inside a portfile- to determine the header or library search path for another port (e.g., as provided by "pkg-config --cflags-only-I dbus-1")? For example, use 'pkg-config' to return information & save that into a variable locally for manipulation? Right now I'm hard-coding headin

Re: qt4-select makes symlink to nothing

2010-07-01 Thread Michael Dickens
Hi Jeremy - Thanks for those outputs; they're interesting. So what do $ ls -l /opt/local/bin/qmake $ ls -ld /opt/local/etc/select/qt4* $ ls -l /opt/local/etc/select/qt4 return? You might want to try: $ sudo qt4_select none $ sudp qt4_select qt4-mac and then see if the symlinks aren't correct.

Re: [MacPorts] #25485: Xaw3d doesn't build +universal or 64-bit on 10.6.4

2010-07-01 Thread Russell Jones
Erm, perhaps I misread the debug output. Will have a look tomorrow. R - Original Message - From: MacPorts To: Russell Jones; macports-tick...@lists.macosforge.org Sent: Thu Jul 01 19:46:39 2010 Subject: Re: [MacPorts] #25485: Xaw3d doesn't build +universal or 64-bit on 10.6.4 #25485:

Re: qt4-select makes symlink to nothing

2010-07-01 Thread Jeremy Lavergne
> Can you do: > > $ ls -d /opt/local/libexec/qt* > > and if 'qt4-mac' is listed, then what do the following commands return: > > $ ls /opt/local/libexec/qt4-mac > $ port installed qt4-mac bin include lib mkspecs phrasebooks plugins q3porting.xml share translations qt4-mac @4.6.3_1+no_debug+no

Re: qt4-select makes symlink to nothing

2010-07-01 Thread Michael Dickens
Hi Jeremy - That's strange; on my install of 'qt4-mac' all of the symlinks go to somewhere. Can you do: $ ls -d /opt/local/libexec/qt* and if 'qt4-mac' is listed, then what do the following commands return: $ ls /opt/local/libexec/qt4-mac $ port installed qt4-mac Likewise, if the command: $ w

Re: change default variants to qt4-* ?

2010-07-01 Thread Michael Dickens
On Thu, 01 Jul 2010 12:34 +0200, "Rainer Müller" wrote: > Instead of making these default variants, rename them to +demo, > +examples etc. That would make more sense. Yes, I had had that thought too -- switching the polarity of the variants' purposes. My bigger question is: Does this change make

qt4-select makes symlink to nothing

2010-07-01 Thread Jeremy Lavergne
After running `qt4_select qt4-mac` I get this symlink to nowhere: /opt/local/share/qt4 -> /opt/local/libexec/qt4-mac/share/qt4-mac Is it simply missing the creation of a directory or is there another symlink for that destination that's missing as well? smime.p7s Description: S/MIME cryptograph

Re: change default variants to qt4-* ?

2010-07-01 Thread Rainer Müller
On 06/30/2010 07:09 PM, Michael Dickens wrote: > I think my changes to the qt4-* series are almost stabilized; one reason > there have been so many issues is because Qt is so large in size and > takes so long to compile (~2 hours on my 2.6 GHz MacBook Pro) -- & hence > some changes were done by "wi