On Jul 31, 2010, at 15:35, Rainer Müller wrote:
> On 2010-08-01 00:07 , Jeremy Huddleston wrote:
>> I have boost installed as +python26+universal:
>> $ port installed boost
>> The following ports are currently installed:
>> boost @1.42.0_0+icu+python26+universal (active)
>>
>> but when upgradin
On Aug 1, 2010, at 15:24, jul wrote:
> I've submitted many new ports
> http://trac.macports.org/query?status=assigned&status=new&status=reopened&reporter=~jul_bsd&summary=~&col=id&col=summary&col=status&col=owner&col=type&col=priority&col=port&order=priority
>
> #25897 [NEW] security/log2timeli
On Aug 1, 2010, at 14:49, David Baumgold wrote:
> I wrote and currently maintain most of the Ruby 1.9 Gem ports currently in
> MacPorts (rb19-*). Recently, Joe Rozner emailed me informing me that my
> rb19-rails port didn't work properly: after a bit of debugging, I discovered
> that he was us
Hello,
I've submitted many new ports
http://trac.macports.org/query?status=assigned&status=new&status=reopened&reporter=~jul_bsd&summary=~&col=id&col=summary&col=status&col=owner&col=type&col=priority&col=port&order=priority
#25897 [NEW] security/log2timeline
#25898 [NEW] security/volatility
#2
I wrote and currently maintain most of the Ruby 1.9 Gem ports currently in
MacPorts (rb19-*). Recently, Joe Rozner emailed me informing me that my
rb19-rails port didn't work properly: after a bit of debugging, I discovered
that he was using the "ruby" executable to run it from the "ruby" port (Rub
> Is this true? I thought negative variants were not currently stored on
> install and therefore not honored during upgrades.
That has changed since 1.9 was released, though with little fanfare.
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
On Sun, Aug 1, 2010 at 04:24, Joshua Root wrote:
>
> At present, if you don't want +openmpi in this situation, you have to
> install with an explicit -openmpi (which is then preserved when you
> upgrade).
Is this true? I thought negative variants were not currently stored
on install and therefor
On 2010-8-1 08:07 , Jeremy Huddleston wrote:
> I have boost installed as +python26+universal:
> $ port installed boost
> The following ports are currently installed:
> boost @1.42.0_0+icu+python26+universal (active)
>
> but when upgrading, it's trying to pull in openmpi (which is a variant that
