Re: call script from Portfile?

2010-09-07 Thread Ryan Schmidt
On Sep 7, 2010, at 16:43, Rainer Müller wrote: > On 2010-09-07 23:27 , Titus von Boxberg wrote: >> Still, would be nice to know why not to handle the issue in post-activate >> commands. > > post-build or post-destroot would be the most appropriate phase for such > a change. Files should not be ch

Re: [71115] trunk/dports/science/gnuradio-grc/Portfile

2010-09-07 Thread Rainer Müller
On 2010-09-04 17:00 , Michael Dickens wrote: > On Wed, 01 Sep 2010 21:18 +0200, "Rainer Müller" > wrote: >> >> You should use the replaced_by option with a revision bump >> which will automatically remove the old port and install >> the new one on upgrade. >> >> replaced_by gnuradio-companion >

Re: call script from Portfile?

2010-09-07 Thread Rainer Müller
On 2010-09-07 23:27 , Titus von Boxberg wrote: > Am 07.09.2010 um 21:43 schrieb Bradley Giesbrecht: >> In which ever phase you want to work you can add some "if [variant_isset >> myvariant]" logic. >> >> man portfile >> /variant > Found it. The variable holding all selected variants of the port is

Re: call script from Portfile?

2010-09-07 Thread Titus von Boxberg
Am 07.09.2010 um 21:43 schrieb Bradley Giesbrecht: > > On Sep 7, 2010, at 12:34 PM, Titus von Boxberg wrote: > >> Am 07.09.2010 um 21:19 schrieb Bradley Giesbrecht: >> >>> >>> On Sep 7, 2010, at 8:56 AM, Titus von Boxberg wrote: >>> Am 01.09.2010 um 08:29 schrieb Ryan Schmidt: >>>

Re: [71264] trunk/dports/math/octave-devel/Portfile

2010-09-07 Thread Ryan Schmidt
On Sep 7, 2010, at 06:27, michae...@macports.org wrote: > Revision: 71264 > http://trac.macports.org/changeset/71264 > Author: michae...@macports.org > Date: 2010-09-07 04:27:56 -0700 (Tue, 07 Sep 2010) > Log Message: > --- > Re-added patch for 10.6 only. > Fixed g95 variant

Re: call script from Portfile?

2010-09-07 Thread Bradley Giesbrecht
On Sep 7, 2010, at 12:34 PM, Titus von Boxberg wrote: Am 07.09.2010 um 21:19 schrieb Bradley Giesbrecht: On Sep 7, 2010, at 8:56 AM, Titus von Boxberg wrote: Am 01.09.2010 um 08:29 schrieb Ryan Schmidt: On Sep 1, 2010, at 01:09, Titus von Boxberg wrote: Is there a phase when both the p

Re: call script from Portfile?

2010-09-07 Thread Titus von Boxberg
Am 07.09.2010 um 21:19 schrieb Bradley Giesbrecht: > > On Sep 7, 2010, at 8:56 AM, Titus von Boxberg wrote: > >> Am 01.09.2010 um 08:29 schrieb Ryan Schmidt: >> >>> >>> On Sep 1, 2010, at 01:09, Titus von Boxberg wrote: >>> Is there a phase when both the port is activated and the build d

Re: call script from Portfile?

2010-09-07 Thread Bradley Giesbrecht
On Sep 7, 2010, at 8:56 AM, Titus von Boxberg wrote: Am 01.09.2010 um 08:29 schrieb Ryan Schmidt: On Sep 1, 2010, at 01:09, Titus von Boxberg wrote: Is there a phase when both the port is activated and the build directory is still in place? Is there a thing like post-activation ? Yes,

Re: call script from Portfile?

2010-09-07 Thread Titus von Boxberg
Am 01.09.2010 um 08:29 schrieb Ryan Schmidt: > > On Sep 1, 2010, at 01:09, Titus von Boxberg wrote: > >> Is there a phase when both the port is activated and the build directory >> is still in place? Is there a thing like post-activation ? > > Yes, you can write a post-activate phase. But that'

Re: Tickets #26139, #26198

2010-09-07 Thread Rainer Müller
On 2010-09-06 16:08 , Titus von Boxberg wrote: > Would a commiter please commit the diffs from these tickets? Committed #26198 in r71265. Committed #26139 in r71266. > And - if not too new - also from #26377 Committed #26377 in r71267. Rainer ___ macp