On Sep 7, 2010, at 16:43, Rainer Müller wrote:
> On 2010-09-07 23:27 , Titus von Boxberg wrote:
>> Still, would be nice to know why not to handle the issue in post-activate
>> commands.
>
> post-build or post-destroot would be the most appropriate phase for such
> a change. Files should not be ch
On 2010-09-04 17:00 , Michael Dickens wrote:
> On Wed, 01 Sep 2010 21:18 +0200, "Rainer Müller"
> wrote:
>>
>> You should use the replaced_by option with a revision bump
>> which will automatically remove the old port and install
>> the new one on upgrade.
>>
>> replaced_by gnuradio-companion
>
On 2010-09-07 23:27 , Titus von Boxberg wrote:
> Am 07.09.2010 um 21:43 schrieb Bradley Giesbrecht:
>> In which ever phase you want to work you can add some "if [variant_isset
>> myvariant]" logic.
>>
>> man portfile
>> /variant
> Found it. The variable holding all selected variants of the port is
Am 07.09.2010 um 21:43 schrieb Bradley Giesbrecht:
>
> On Sep 7, 2010, at 12:34 PM, Titus von Boxberg wrote:
>
>> Am 07.09.2010 um 21:19 schrieb Bradley Giesbrecht:
>>
>>>
>>> On Sep 7, 2010, at 8:56 AM, Titus von Boxberg wrote:
>>>
Am 01.09.2010 um 08:29 schrieb Ryan Schmidt:
>>>
On Sep 7, 2010, at 06:27, michae...@macports.org wrote:
> Revision: 71264
> http://trac.macports.org/changeset/71264
> Author: michae...@macports.org
> Date: 2010-09-07 04:27:56 -0700 (Tue, 07 Sep 2010)
> Log Message:
> ---
> Re-added patch for 10.6 only.
> Fixed g95 variant
On Sep 7, 2010, at 12:34 PM, Titus von Boxberg wrote:
Am 07.09.2010 um 21:19 schrieb Bradley Giesbrecht:
On Sep 7, 2010, at 8:56 AM, Titus von Boxberg wrote:
Am 01.09.2010 um 08:29 schrieb Ryan Schmidt:
On Sep 1, 2010, at 01:09, Titus von Boxberg wrote:
Is there a phase when both the p
Am 07.09.2010 um 21:19 schrieb Bradley Giesbrecht:
>
> On Sep 7, 2010, at 8:56 AM, Titus von Boxberg wrote:
>
>> Am 01.09.2010 um 08:29 schrieb Ryan Schmidt:
>>
>>>
>>> On Sep 1, 2010, at 01:09, Titus von Boxberg wrote:
>>>
Is there a phase when both the port is activated and the build d
On Sep 7, 2010, at 8:56 AM, Titus von Boxberg wrote:
Am 01.09.2010 um 08:29 schrieb Ryan Schmidt:
On Sep 1, 2010, at 01:09, Titus von Boxberg wrote:
Is there a phase when both the port is activated and the build
directory
is still in place? Is there a thing like post-activation ?
Yes,
Am 01.09.2010 um 08:29 schrieb Ryan Schmidt:
>
> On Sep 1, 2010, at 01:09, Titus von Boxberg wrote:
>
>> Is there a phase when both the port is activated and the build directory
>> is still in place? Is there a thing like post-activation ?
>
> Yes, you can write a post-activate phase. But that'
On 2010-09-06 16:08 , Titus von Boxberg wrote:
> Would a commiter please commit the diffs from these tickets?
Committed #26198 in r71265.
Committed #26139 in r71266.
> And - if not too new - also from #26377
Committed #26377 in r71267.
Rainer
___
macp
10 matches
Mail list logo