On Nov 8, 2010, at 00:07, Galen Wright-Watson wrote:
I've a few customizations for the `port` command, and I'm getting tired of
patching with each new release, so I'm offering them up for inclusion into
the base, should others be interested.
Thanks!
The attached port.patch contains a
On 2010-11-08 08:59 , Anders F Björklund wrote:
Galen Wright-Watson wrote:
I've a few customizations for the `port` command, and I'm getting tired of
patching with each new release, so I'm offering them up for inclusion into
the base, should others be interested. The attached port.patch
On 2010-11-8 19:55 , Galen Wright-Watson wrote:
Would a nodepts pseudoport be useful?
Maybe; do you have a use case for this where leaves isn't what you want?
- Josh
___
macports-dev mailing list
macports-dev@lists.macosforge.org
On Mon, Nov 8, 2010 at 04:49, Joshua Root j...@macports.org wrote:
On 2010-11-8 19:55 , Galen Wright-Watson wrote:
Would a nodepts pseudoport be useful?
Maybe; do you have a use case for this where leaves isn't what you want?
When you want to see which ports you _could_ remove, that aren't
When you want to see which ports you _could_ remove, that aren't
depended on by anything else.
There are times when you may have installed a port as a trial and no
longer need it to be installed.
In this case, it may simply be better to include an option for leaves
which doesn't exclude the
On Nov 7, 2010, at 1:20 AM, Blair Zajac wrote:
On 11/6/10 10:55 PM, Adam Mercer wrote:
On Sun, Nov 7, 2010 at 00:07,j...@macports.org wrote:
Revision 73229 Author j...@macports.org Date 2010-11-06 22:07:55 -0700 (Sat,
06 Nov 2010)
Log Message
apply r73226 to 1.9.2 tag
Modified
On 2010-11-08 15:26 , Jeremy Lavergne wrote:
When you want to see which ports you _could_ remove, that aren't
depended on by anything else.
There are times when you may have installed a port as a trial and no
longer need it to be installed.
In this case, it may simply be better to include an
On Nov 8, 2010, at 11:30, mcalh...@macports.org wrote:
Revision: 73274
http://trac.macports.org/changeset/73274
Author: mcalh...@macports.org
Date: 2010-11-08 09:30:08 -0800 (Mon, 08 Nov 2010)
Log Message:
---
emacs: librsvg is found automatically if installed, so
On 2010-11-9 01:26 , Jeremy Lavergne wrote:
When you want to see which ports you _could_ remove, that aren't
depended on by anything else.
There are times when you may have installed a port as a trial and no
longer need it to be installed.
In this case, it may simply be better to include an
On 2010-11-9 03:39 , � wrote:
port echo leaves and not requested
The 'and not requested' is redundant.
- Josh
___
macports-dev mailing list
macports-dev@lists.macosforge.org
http://lists.macosforge.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/macports-dev
On Thu, Oct 28, 2010 at 01:47:48AM +0200, Rainer M?ller wrote:
On 2010-10-27 03:58 , Dan Ports wrote:
Can move xmlto's dblatex/texlive dependencies into a variant, or better
yet a separate port?
As these are runtime dependencies, I assume we could remove them from
xmlto and add them on
11 matches
Mail list logo
