On Apr 21, 2011, at 19:16, Blair Zajac wrote:
On Apr 21, 2011, at 5:09 PM, Ryan Schmidt wrote:
On Apr 21, 2011, at 19:08, Blair Zajac wrote:
On Apr 21, 2011, at 5:06 PM, Ryan Schmidt wrote:
You also switched from downloading the source and building it, to
downloading and installing a
On Apr 21, 2011, at 16:07, j...@macports.org wrote:
Revision: 78062
http://trac.macports.org/changeset/78062
Author: j...@macports.org
Date: 2011-04-21 14:07:51 -0700 (Thu, 21 Apr 2011)
Log Message:
---
implement subports
What's this?
On 2011-4-22 16:46 , Ryan Schmidt wrote:
On Apr 21, 2011, at 16:07, j...@macports.org wrote:
Revision: 78062
http://trac.macports.org/changeset/78062
Author: j...@macports.org
Date: 2011-04-21 14:07:51 -0700 (Thu, 21 Apr 2011)
Log Message:
---
implement subports
Would a committer please commit (or comment) the files.
And, since quite often it is necessary to ping into this list
to get patches recognized: How do I apply for commit rights?
If this list is the right place, then please take this mail
as an application ;-)
Regards
Titus
Am 22.04.2011 um
See https://trac.macports.org/ticket/16723 for sample usage.
The commit message could stand to be more informative.
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
___
macports-dev mailing list
macports-dev@lists.macosforge.org
On 22 Apr 2011, at 06:02, Thomas de Grivel wrote:
Remote execution of arbitrary code ? I picked sudo as an example but
without signing it is also possible to replace any package to run any code
and install it in the system as setuid if the Makefile says so. sudo is just
more discreet as it
Does anyone have any comment on the change I've proposed in ticket #28393?
http://trac.macports.org/ticket/28393
--
Larry Gilbert (L2G)
___
macports-dev mailing list
macports-dev@lists.macosforge.org
