Thanks,
Francois.
___
macports-dev mailing list
macports-dev@lists.macosforge.org
http://lists.macosforge.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/macports-dev
On Apr 26, 2011, at 11:46 PM, Felipe Tanus wrote:
> 2011/4/26 Rainer Müller :
> [...]
>> Derek, Clemens, Felipe, welcome to our community!
>>
>> Although you have already introduced yourself on the mailing list with
>> your proposals, it would probably be a good idea if you three could
>> reply
2011/4/26 Rainer Müller :
[...]
> Derek, Clemens, Felipe, welcome to our community!
>
> Although you have already introduced yourself on the mailing list with
> your proposals, it would probably be a good idea if you three could
> reply with a few words about your upcoming projects.
Hi,
First of
Hi,
I would like to request my patches from ticket #29146 [1] against the
outdated nc6 port to be commited, since the maintainer hasn't commented
since 11 days.
The old version 0.5 has several issues like not collecting zombie
processes when used with --continuous --exec CMD.
The last change to t
Hi Everyone,
Thanks for the warm welcome! I'm looking forward to working with all
of you in the MacPorts community this summer.
My project is to develop a system for collecting and displaying
information about how people are using MacPorts. The "How?" question
is answered by collecting data from
On Apr 19, 2011, at 12:33, p...@macports.org wrote:
> Revision: 78018
> http://trac.macports.org/changeset/78018
> Author: p...@macports.org
> Date: 2011-04-19 10:33:03 -0700 (Tue, 19 Apr 2011)
> Log Message:
> ---
> Added port ditaa
Well, you added it 6 weeks ago in r76608
On Apr 26, 2011, at 10:00 AM, Russell Jones wrote:
>> That is neither a good or bad thing that its impossible to convert.
> I'm not sure on what basis you conclude it's impossible, though you're likely
> right.
>
> It is not a really, really bad thing, no, but it does mean that we can't make
>
> That is neither a good or bad thing that its impossible to convert.
I'm not sure on what basis you conclude it's impossible, though you're likely
right.
It is not a really, really bad thing, no, but it does mean that we can't make
use a load of work that's already been done in terms of profili
On Apr 26, 2011, at 5:04 AM, Russell Jones wrote:
>> But it *is* the 21st century and I most definitely am interested
>> in seeing Lion sandboxing, just like everyone else is waiting.
>
> I wonder if it will be possible to convert SELinux and/or AppArmor profiles
> to the system Lion will use.
Hello,
for the Google Summer of Code program 2011 our organization, The
MacPorts Project, got three slots assigned. We filled them based on the
quality of the proposals and on the limited mentor capacities we have.
Unfortunately, we get less and less proposals each year, but at least
the overall
> But it *is* the 21st century and I most definitely am interested
> in seeing Lion sandboxing, just like everyone else is waiting.
I wonder if it will be possible to convert SELinux and/or AppArmor profiles to
the system Lion will use. Has there been any public indication of how Apple are
plann
2011/4/25 Bruce Perens :
> I use Valgrind too. Electric Fence has surely paid off for the few days I
> put into it. Don't hold anything up for this.
efence is so much simplier than valgrind.
Of course valgrind is much simplier to use, but the simple usecase
with gdb being right at the point of the
On 04/22/11 16:14, Bayard Bell wrote:
On 22 Apr 2011, at 06:02, Thomas de Grivel wrote:
"Remote execution of arbitrary code" ? I picked sudo as an example but without
signing it is also possible to replace any package to run any code and install it in the
system as setuid if the Makefile says
13 matches
Mail list logo
