On 2011-7-5 11:31 , Jeremy Lavergne wrote:
>> This sounds very similar to what postfix does.
>
> postfix employs ldelete as well, but I'm curious must one re-set the variable
> (CCARGS) after deleting from it?
Yep. It works like lreplace, which returns a new list and doesn't modify
the original
Here's what I've come up with so far; let me know if you have further
suggestions.
* revbump
* gutted no_ variants and made them require the negative of the new variants
* new variants conflict with no_ variants, utilize lappend/ldelete
* marked date with comment, at a suitable time in the fu
> This sounds very similar to what postfix does.
postfix employs ldelete as well, but I'm curious must one re-set the variable
(CCARGS) after deleting from it?
variant pcre description "add pcre support" {
set CCARGS [ldelete ${CCARGS} -DNO_PCRE]
lappend CCARGS -DHAS_PCRE "-I${pref
> This sounds very similar to what postfix does.
Perfect!
Use lappend in variant blocks to manage a list and then for build phase have
build.args set equal to the list---it converts!
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
___
macports-
On 2011-7-5 11:02 , Jeremy Lavergne wrote:
> I've got a port that's using +no_ variants presently. I'd like to migrate it
> off but I'm not sure I can replicate the build.args behavior necessary to
> deal with the setup. You see, build.args takes one argument but it has
> several values in it.
>
I've got a port that's using +no_ variants presently. I'd like to migrate it
off but I'm not sure I can replicate the build.args behavior necessary to deal
with the setup. You see, build.args takes one argument but it has several
values in it.
build.args ARG="-DVALUE1 -DVALUE2 -DVALUE3"
We've
On Mon, Jul 04, 2011 at 08:27:27PM -0400, Jack Howarth wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 04, 2011 at 04:48:24PM -0700, Jeremy Huddleston wrote:
> >
> > On Jul 4, 2011, at 14:04, Jack Howarth wrote:
> >
> > > On Mon, Jul 04, 2011 at 01:29:31PM -0700, Blair Zajac wrote:
> > >>
> > >> On Jul 4, 2011, at 11:30 A
On Mon, Jul 04, 2011 at 04:48:24PM -0700, Jeremy Huddleston wrote:
>
> On Jul 4, 2011, at 14:04, Jack Howarth wrote:
>
> > On Mon, Jul 04, 2011 at 01:29:31PM -0700, Blair Zajac wrote:
> >>
> >> On Jul 4, 2011, at 11:30 AM, Jack Howarth wrote:
> >>
> >>> On Mon, Jul 04, 2011 at 11:16:48AM -0700,
> Looks like you used -b and there was no archive available.
Got it.
The env variable ARCHIVE_SITE_LOCAL wasn't set.
Thanks for the tip off ;-)
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
___
macports-dev mailing list
macports-dev@lists.m
> Looks like you used -b and there was no archive available.
Isn't that why it's trying to fetch the archive then?
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
___
macports-dev mailing list
macports-dev@lists.macosforge.org
http://lists.macos
On 2011-7-5 01:19 , Jeremy Lavergne wrote:
> I seem to have run into an issue with archivefetch failing. It doesn't seem
> to be directly related to that though, more like a missing file:
> DEBUG: couldn't open
> "/System/Library/Frameworks/Tcl.framework/Versions/8.5/Resources/tclIndex":
> no su
On Jul 4, 2011, at 14:04, Jack Howarth wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 04, 2011 at 01:29:31PM -0700, Blair Zajac wrote:
>>
>> On Jul 4, 2011, at 11:30 AM, Jack Howarth wrote:
>>
>>> On Mon, Jul 04, 2011 at 11:16:48AM -0700, Blair Zajac wrote:
On Jul 4, 2011, at 11:14 AM, Jeremy Huddleston wrote:
On Mon, Jul 04, 2011 at 01:29:31PM -0700, Blair Zajac wrote:
>
> On Jul 4, 2011, at 11:30 AM, Jack Howarth wrote:
>
> > On Mon, Jul 04, 2011 at 11:16:48AM -0700, Blair Zajac wrote:
> >> On Jul 4, 2011, at 11:14 AM, Jeremy Huddleston wrote:
> >>>
> >>> All of the ports that are in my install-set
On Jul 4, 2011, at 13:16, Blair Zajac wrote:
> Out of curiosity, Apple hasn't bumped to a newer gcc version? Does anybody
> know why?
My understanding is that newer GCC versions are released under version 3 of the
GPL, and that Apple does not like that version of the license.
http://apple.s
On Jul 4, 2011, at 11:30 AM, Jack Howarth wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 04, 2011 at 11:16:48AM -0700, Blair Zajac wrote:
>> On Jul 4, 2011, at 11:14 AM, Jeremy Huddleston wrote:
>>>
>>> All of the ports that are in my install-set (including many multimedia
>>> ports, x11, firefox, gnome, with most bloat
On Jul 4, 2011, at 11:16, Blair Zajac wrote:
> On Jul 4, 2011, at 11:14 AM, Jeremy Huddleston wrote:
>>
>> All of the ports that are in my install-set (including many multimedia
>> ports, x11, firefox, gnome, with most bloat variants set) have been working
>> with trunk/base using llvm-gcc-4.2
On Mon, Jul 04, 2011 at 11:16:48AM -0700, Blair Zajac wrote:
> On Jul 4, 2011, at 11:14 AM, Jeremy Huddleston wrote:
>>
>> All of the ports that are in my install-set (including many multimedia
>> ports, x11, firefox, gnome, with most bloat variants set) have been
>> working with trunk/base using
On Jul 4, 2011, at 11:14 AM, Jeremy Huddleston wrote:
All of the ports that are in my install-set (including many
multimedia ports, x11, firefox, gnome, with most bloat variants set)
have been working with trunk/base using llvm-gcc-4.2 on SL and Lion
for a while now (trunk/base now chooses
On Jul 4, 2011, at 09:00, Jordan K. Hubbard wrote:
>
> On Jul 4, 2011, at 5:27 AM, S. M. Ibrahim (Lavlu) wrote:
>
>> mac os x lion is already in GM state. Are macports ready for it ? i
>> installed macports from source (trunk) , but lot's of package failed to
>> build. but not reporting it on
On Jul 4, 2011, at 5:27 AM, S. M. Ibrahim (Lavlu) wrote:
> mac os x lion is already in GM state. Are macports ready for it ? i installed
> macports from source (trunk) , but lot's of package failed to build. but not
> reporting it on trac as i saw one ticket was closed with "we are not giving
On Jul 4, 2011, at 5:27 AM, S. M. Ibrahim (Lavlu) wrote:
> mac os x lion is already in GM state. Are macports ready for it ? i installed
> macports from source (trunk) , but lot's of package failed to build. but not
> reporting it on trac as i saw one ticket was closed with "we are not giving
Btw, this is what is in my Tcl resources folder:
$ ls -F
/System/Library/Frameworks/Tcl.framework/Versions/8.5/ResourcesDocumentation/
Info.plist
Scripts/
license.terms
tcl8/
version.plist
On Jul 4, 2011, at 11:19 , Jeremy Lavergne wrote:
> DEBUG: couldn't open
> "/System/Library/Frameworks/Tcl
I seem to have run into an issue with archivefetch failing. It doesn't seem to
be directly related to that though, more like a missing file:
DEBUG: couldn't open
"/System/Library/Frameworks/Tcl.framework/Versions/8.5/Resources/tclIndex": no
such file or directory
I've done `make distclean` and
Hi Jeremy,
On 2011-07-03 17:31:46 -0700, Jeremy Huddleston wrote:
> Hey vincent,
>
> I noticed that the banner printed in pari incorrectly identifies the compiler
> when building with clang.
>
> I is being reported as "gcc-3.0":
>
>
On 2011-07-02 05:16:27 -0500, Ryan Schmidt wrote:
> There may be legitimate cases for overriding the default variant description,
> to provide more info (like pari and perhaps glew). Not sure what we should
> do. Either leave things the way they are (and let the port author get a lint
> warning
hi,
mac os x lion is already in GM state. Are macports ready for it ? i
installed macports from source (trunk) , but lot's of package failed to
build. but not reporting it on trac as i saw one ticket was closed with "we
are not giving support for lion" (something like this).
now my question, is m
I don't know if there's a policy, but kile-kde4 would seem like a more
descriptive name. I can't really find any port names of that form, though.
Alternatively kile21, (like python25. emacs22, etc)
Russell
From: macports-dev-boun...@lists.macosforge.org
27 matches
Mail list logo
