Re: [MacPorts] #30392: splash: gcc44 should not be default variant if user chooses other gcc variant

2011-07-28 Thread Daniel Price
See my previous post: I think this is now solved... On 29 Jul 2011, at 15:09, MacPorts wrote: > #30392: splash: gcc44 should not be default variant if user chooses other gcc > variant > --+- > Reporter: macsforever2000@…

Re: sed patterns to add sha256

2011-07-28 Thread Jeremy Lavergne
In case you're wondering, it's setup for multiline as you'll likely need it to replace everything before rmd160: /checksums.*rmd160/checksums\ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ rmd160/ On Jul 28, 2011, at 22:45 , Jeremy Lavergne wrote: > While tinkering around tonight I figured I'd share my multline sed for

sed patterns to add sha256

2011-07-28 Thread Jeremy Lavergne
While tinkering around tonight I figured I'd share my multline sed for updating sha256: for i in `port -q echo maintainer:snc`; do x=$(sudo port -v checksum $i | grep sha256 |grep -v checksum | awk '{print $NF}'); sed -i '' -n '1h;1!H;${;g;s/sha256\ \ s/sha256\ \ '$x'/g;p;}' "`port file $i`";

Re: [81252] branches/gsoc11-rev-upgrade/base

2011-07-28 Thread Ryan Schmidt
On Jul 28, 2011, at 17:55, Clemens Lang wrote: > On Thu, Jul 28, 2011 at 05:37:09PM -0500, Ryan Schmidt wrote: >> Please please please no. We extremely do not want MacPorts users >> installing anything in /usr/local. We constantly tell users not to do >> this because we constantly receive bug repo

Re: [81260] branches/gsoc11-rev-upgrade/base/src/macports1.0/macports.tcl

2011-07-28 Thread Ryan Schmidt
On Jul 28, 2011, at 17:41, Clemens Lang wrote: > On Thu, Jul 28, 2011 at 05:34:26PM -0500, Ryan Schmidt wrote: >> Shouldn't you use $UI_PREFIX instead of hardcoding "--->" here? > > I wasn't aware there was a variable for this. It's not used anywhere in > macports1.0/macports.tcl. Do you want me

Re: [81260] branches/gsoc11-rev-upgrade/base/src/macports1.0/macports.tcl

2011-07-28 Thread Jeremy Lavergne
> I wasn't aware there was a variable for this. It's not used anywhere in > macports1.0/macports.tcl. Do you want me to convert all occurrences to > $UI_PREFIX? Go for it. Make sure such a conversion is a separate commit. smime.p7s Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature __

New features in 2.0.0

2011-07-28 Thread Joshua Root
Now that the customary week has passed since the release of 2.0.0, I thought I'd point out some of the goodies that are now available to portfile authors. 1. SHA256 checksums - should be self-explanatory. 2. The sqlite registry is now mandatory, which means workarounds for the flat format can be

Re: port -v dependents

2011-07-28 Thread Joshua Root
On 2011-7-29 02:32 , Bradley Giesbrecht wrote: > What is (by port:) meaning? > The port dovecot2 has a path: style dependency on mysql5 > (path:bin/mysql_config5:mysql5) when the +mysql5 variant is used. > > $ port -v dependents mysql5 > dbslayer depends on mysql5 (by port:) > dovecot2 depends on

Re: [81252] branches/gsoc11-rev-upgrade/base

2011-07-28 Thread Clemens Lang
On Thu, Jul 28, 2011 at 05:37:09PM -0500, Ryan Schmidt wrote: > Please please please no. We extremely do not want MacPorts users > installing anything in /usr/local. We constantly tell users not to do > this because we constantly receive bug reports from users who have > things installed there whic

Re: [81252] branches/gsoc11-rev-upgrade/base

2011-07-28 Thread Blair Zajac
On 7/28/11 3:37 PM, Ryan Schmidt wrote: On Jul 28, 2011, at 03:32, c...@macports.org wrote: +AC_PATH_PROG(SWIG, [swig], [$PATH:/usr/local/bin]) + @echo "Building ${SWIG_SRCS} requires swig, which you apparently did not have installed when configuring MacPorts.">&2 + @echo "Please

Re: [81260] branches/gsoc11-rev-upgrade/base/src/macports1.0/macports.tcl

2011-07-28 Thread Clemens Lang
On Thu, Jul 28, 2011 at 05:34:26PM -0500, Ryan Schmidt wrote: > Shouldn't you use $UI_PREFIX instead of hardcoding "--->" here? I wasn't aware there was a variable for this. It's not used anywhere in macports1.0/macports.tcl. Do you want me to convert all occurrences to $UI_PREFIX? -- Clemens La

Re: [81252] branches/gsoc11-rev-upgrade/base

2011-07-28 Thread Ryan Schmidt
On Jul 28, 2011, at 03:32, c...@macports.org wrote: > Revision: 81252 > http://trac.macports.org/changeset/81252 > Author: c...@macports.org > Date: 2011-07-28 01:32:37 -0700 (Thu, 28 Jul 2011) > Log Message: > --- > rev-upgrade: src/machista1.0 needs SWIG, these changes loc

Re: [81260] branches/gsoc11-rev-upgrade/base/src/macports1.0/macports.tcl

2011-07-28 Thread Ryan Schmidt
On Jul 28, 2011, at 05:35, c...@macports.org wrote: > Revision: 81260 > http://trac.macports.org/changeset/81260 > Author: c...@macports.org > Date: 2011-07-28 03:35:05 -0700 (Thu, 28 Jul 2011) > Log Message: > --- > rev-upgrade: topologically sort broken ports > +

[patch] Adding "builtin_modules" variant in Pango

2011-07-28 Thread Fabiano Fidêncio
Howdy! I'm AbiWord developer and I've been issues to ship pango into my .app as is the Portfile. So, to fix it, I'm adding a variant to build modules statically into Pango. There are 2 patches attached, one for pango and another for pango-devel Could someone review and apply? Best Regards, -- F

port -v dependents

2011-07-28 Thread Bradley Giesbrecht
What is (by port:) meaning? The port dovecot2 has a path: style dependency on mysql5 (path:bin/mysql_config5:mysql5) when the +mysql5 variant is used. $ port -v dependents mysql5 dbslayer depends on mysql5 (by port:) dovecot2 depends on mysql5 (by port:) dspam-devel depends on mysql5 (by port:) l

Re: cclient depends_lib lib:libgssapi_krb5:kerberos5

2011-07-28 Thread Bradley Giesbrecht
On Jul 28, 2011, at 12:32 AM, Ryan Schmidt wrote: > > On Jul 27, 2011, at 19:46, Bradley Giesbrecht wrote: > >> Does anyone recall if the cclient dependency on libgssapi_krb5 is intended >> to be fulfilled by /usr/lib/libgssapi_krb5.dylib? > > I believe that probably is the intention, yes. My

Re: cclient depends_lib lib:libgssapi_krb5:kerberos5

2011-07-28 Thread Ryan Schmidt
On Jul 27, 2011, at 19:46, Bradley Giesbrecht wrote: > Does anyone recall if the cclient dependency on libgssapi_krb5 is intended to > be fulfilled by /usr/lib/libgssapi_krb5.dylib? I believe that probably is the intention, yes. My recollection is that MacPorts kerberos is not as capable as Ma