On Aug 27, 2011, at 04:55, Anders F Björklund wrote:
> Jordan K. Hubbard wrote:
>
>> On Aug 24, 2011, at 12:06 PM, Ryan Schmidt wrote:
>>
>>> And I think we all know that Apple prides itself on producing software that
>>> has *few* options. Apple does *not* add an option to iTunes or iOS just
Titus von Boxberg wrote:
>> Unless somebody completes Pallet, the only working GUI would be Port
>> Authority. And that is still too technical for most users, since they don't
>> want to hear about ports/packages but about apps/software. With icons. Big
>> icons. So it would need something mor
On Aug 27, 2011, at 4:44 AM, MacPorts wrote:
> #30981: When trying to build kmymoney4 it hangs on virtuoso
> -+--
> Reporter: linuxstuff@… | Owner: snc@…
> Type: defect
Rainer Müller wrote:
> On 2011-08-27 12:26 , Anders F Björklund wrote:
>> This sounds like the discussion about using /usr/local for prefix ?
>> (rather than the /opt/local, which everybody confuses with /opt ...)
>> It's even more fun, since it's in the default search paths and thus
>> will affec
Am 27.08.2011 um 11:55 schrieb Anders F Björklund:
>>
>> I guess, then, that this is really an appeal to hide the details since you
>> can only get away with doing things "the Apple way" if you also hide the
>> majority of the working parts from the end-user. In MacPorts' case, this
>> would
On 2011-08-26 20:00 , Ryan Schmidt wrote:
> Agreed, these keywords seem to work well. This page could be expanded with
> some premade searches for some of these keywords:
>
> https://trac.macports.org/wiki/Tickets#Keywords
I guess we can delete the other keywords listed there as they have not
be
On 2011-08-27 12:26 , Anders F Björklund wrote:
> This sounds like the discussion about using /usr/local for prefix ?
> (rather than the /opt/local, which everybody confuses with /opt ...)
> It's even more fun, since it's in the default search paths and thus
> will affect most things afterwards - e
Ryan Schmidt wrote:
> Right now, we know that MacPorts works, when pulling in all these
> dependencies people in this thread are so keen to remove. We could spend a
> lot of effort changing a lot of ports to use system dependencies, and find
> that it doesn't work for a bunch of ports, and we'v
Jordan K. Hubbard wrote:
> On Aug 24, 2011, at 12:06 PM, Ryan Schmidt wrote:
>
>> And I think we all know that Apple prides itself on producing software that
>> has *few* options. Apple does *not* add an option to iTunes or iOS just
>> because one power user thinks it might be fun to play with.
