Re: :info:build i686-apple-darwin10-g++-4.2.1: -current_version only allowed with -dynamiclib

2011-09-27 Thread Marko Käning
On Sep 27, 2011, at 7:57 PM, Jeremy Lavergne wrote: > It's cmake-specific. > As for editing it to be correct to begin with, you might find that the > variables from build/CMakeCache are in source/CMakeLists, or are part of > the CMake/KDE/Qt macros. Well, since I've never seen an error like this

Re: commit access

2011-09-27 Thread Titus von Boxberg
Am 26.09.2011 um 21:07 schrieb Ryan Schmidt: > On Sep 26, 2011, at 13:26, Jordan K. Hubbard wrote: > >> On Sep 26, 2011, at 2:51 AM, Rainer Müller wrote: >> >>> On 09/24/2011 10:53 AM, Titus von Boxberg wrote: I followed http://guide.macports.org/#project.membership to apply for commit

Re: :info:build i686-apple-darwin10-g++-4.2.1: -current_version only allowed with -dynamiclib

2011-09-27 Thread Jeremy Lavergne
It's cmake-specific. You might find that editing build/CMakeCache can be fruitful. That'll store everything after it was computed, so you'd be able to change anything before it gets used. As for editing it to be correct to begin with, you might find that the variables from build/CMakeCache are in

:info:build i686-apple-darwin10-g++-4.2.1: -current_version only allowed with -dynamiclib

2011-09-27 Thread Marko Käning
Hi devs, any idea what could be done in a Portfile of in the original CMakeLists.txt to avoid a build error like this: --- :info:build i686-apple-darwin10-g++-4.2.1: -current_version only allowed with -dynamiclib :info:build make[2]: *** [grantlee/0.1/grantlee_skroogefilters.0.9.99.so] Error 1

Re: [84494] trunk/dports/python/py-psycopg2/Portfile

2011-09-27 Thread Jeremy Lavergne
> You should also use the exact modeline listed here: > > http://guide.macports.org/#development.creating-portfile Went through and replaced all instances of the modeline I had copy/pasted from: r84511 r84512. ___ macports-dev mailing list macports-dev

Re: submitting support for suppressing static and dynamic libs

2011-09-27 Thread Joshua Root
Apparently the link expired after a month. He put up a new file at the same location a while ago, but it may be expired again by now. I'm not sure why the download has to expire. - Josh On 2011-6-1 17:45 , stavanger wrote: > > Hi James, > > I've been trying to cross compile the boost library fo