Re: gcc-4.2 vs apple-gcc-4.2

2012-01-17 Thread Jeremy Huddleston
On Jan 17, 2012, at 3:46 PM, Ryan Schmidt wrote: > > On Jan 17, 2012, at 17:43, Jeremy Huddleston wrote: > >> That looks good to me, but I would very much like to know what ports fall >> into this category, so I can check if this is still the case with >> top-of-tree clang and file a bug agai

Re: gcc-4.2 vs apple-gcc-4.2

2012-01-17 Thread Clemens Lang
On Tue, Jan 17, 2012 at 05:46:58PM -0600, Ryan Schmidt wrote: > It's just so tedious. I don't have time to file all these bug reports > and keep track of what versions of clang work. I'm happy if we can > commit a fix, any fix, that lets a port compile. A lot of those problems are only caused by c

Re: gcc-4.2 vs apple-gcc-4.2

2012-01-17 Thread Ryan Schmidt
On Jan 17, 2012, at 17:43, Jeremy Huddleston wrote: > That looks good to me, but I would very much like to know what ports fall > into this category, so I can check if this is still the case with top-of-tree > clang and file a bug against the compiler if necessary. > > I know wine falls into t

Re: locations of log file

2012-01-17 Thread Clemens Lang
There still is a config.log, although you might be having a hard time to find it. I agree this message should be adjusted, though, if possible. -- Clemens on the road ___ macports-dev mailing list macports-dev@lists.macosforge.org http://lists.macosforg

Re: gcc-4.2 vs apple-gcc-4.2

2012-01-17 Thread Jeremy Huddleston
That looks good to me, but I would very much like to know what ports fall into this category, so I can check if this is still the case with top-of-tree clang and file a bug against the compiler if necessary. I know wine falls into this category, but most "normal" ports should be fine with clang

Re: [MacPorts] #32907: tesseract @3.00_2+eng Not using leptonica

2012-01-17 Thread Mark Anderson
Can you attach the log it's talking about? Probably config.log in /opt/local/var/macports/ build/_opt_local_var_macports_sources_rsync.macports.org_release_ports_textproc_tesseract/tesseract/work/tesseract-3.01 Thanks, Mark On Tue, Jan 17, 2012 at 12:16 PM, MacPorts wrote: > #32907: tesseract

Re: locations of log file

2012-01-17 Thread Scott Webster
I don't think the log file for selfupdate actually exists... I think the message saying it does is in error, unfortunately. Scott On Tue, Jan 17, 2012 at 12:24 PM, Jeremy Lavergne wrote: >> The correct command is "port log".  I suggest taking a look at "man 1 port". >>  Several looks. > > He's

Re: locations of log file

2012-01-17 Thread Jeremy Lavergne
> The correct command is "port log". I suggest taking a look at "man 1 port". > Several looks. He's after the logs for selfupdate itself, not a specific port. In either case, `port logfile ...` is just as legit as `port log ...`--when asking about logs for specific ports. logfile shows the fi

Re: [88997] trunk/dports/python/py-scipy/Portfile

2012-01-17 Thread Ryan Schmidt
On Jan 16, 2012, at 20:24, Joshua Root wrote: > You still have to ask Bill to create you a buildbot account. I have a buildbot account, but I'm still not clear how to force a rebuild. I go to http://build.macports.org/ then click on Buildslaves then on buildports-snowleopard-x86_64. Then I can