On Mar 21, 2012, at 11:59, Joshua Root wrote:
> On 2012-3-22 03:15 , Ryan Schmidt wrote:
>>
>> On Mar 21, 2012, at 10:39, j...@macports.org wrote:
>>
>>> * A frameworks_dir and applications_dir are associated with each group of
>>> sites as well as a prefix; sites are excluded when they don't
On Mar 21, 2012, at 13:22, Leo Singer wrote:
> On Mar 21, 2012, at 12:08 PM, Ryan Schmidt wrote:
>
>> I'd also still check whether adding a universal variant (i.e. by adding the
>> line "variant universal {}" on a line before you invoke
>> [get_canonical_archs]) works.
>
> Both that and
>
>
On Mar 21, 2012, at 12:08 PM, Ryan Schmidt wrote:
>
> On Mar 21, 2012, at 11:00, Leo Singer wrote:
>
>>> The build process currently hides the actual compile commands from us,
>>> making it not totally easy to see whether we've succeeded. If you can make
>>> the build output more verbosely tha
On 2012-3-22 03:15 , Ryan Schmidt wrote:
>
> On Mar 21, 2012, at 10:39, j...@macports.org wrote:
>
>> * A frameworks_dir and applications_dir are associated with each group of
>> sites as well as a prefix; sites are excluded when they don't match the
>> current values
>
> This addresses:
>
>
On 2012-03-19, Joshua Root wrote:
>
> There is no "default". There are just a bunch of ports. You get
> precisely the one you ask for. If you can't decide which one to declare
> at the top level, roll dice or something.
This seems then, like there shouldn't be a top-level port when
subports are d
On Mar 21, 2012, at 10:39, j...@macports.org wrote:
> * A frameworks_dir and applications_dir are associated with each group of
> sites as well as a prefix; sites are excluded when they don't match the
> current values
This addresses:
https://trac.macports.org/ticket/31186
Although it looks
On Mar 21, 2012, at 11:00, Leo Singer wrote:
>> The build process currently hides the actual compile commands from us,
>> making it not totally easy to see whether we've succeeded. If you can make
>> the build output more verbosely that would be great.
>
> By build process, do you mean the Mac
On Mar 21, 2012, at 11:35 AM, Ryan Schmidt wrote:
>
> On Mar 21, 2012, at 09:11, Leo Singer wrote:
>
>> Attached is a revised Portfile. I am having trouble with
>> get_canonical_archflags. After adding to build.post_args-append:
>>
>> CC="${configure.cc} [get_canonical_arch
On Mar 21, 2012, at 09:11, Leo Singer wrote:
> Attached is a revised Portfile. I am having trouble with
> get_canonical_archflags. After adding to build.post_args-append:
>
>CC="${configure.cc} [get_canonical_archflags cc]" \
>CL="${configure.cc} [get_c
On 2012-3-22 01:50 , Leo Singer wrote:
> On Mar 21, 2012, at 10:29 AM, Joshua Root wrote:
>
>> On 2012-3-22 01:11 , Leo Singer wrote:
>>> Attached is a revised Portfile. I am having trouble with
>>> get_canonical_archflags. After adding to build.post_args-append:
>>>
>>>CC="
On Mar 21, 2012, at 10:29 AM, Joshua Root wrote:
> On 2012-3-22 01:11 , Leo Singer wrote:
>> Attached is a revised Portfile. I am having trouble with
>> get_canonical_archflags. After adding to build.post_args-append:
>>
>>CC="${configure.cc} [get_canonical_archflags cc]" \
On 2012-3-22 01:11 , Leo Singer wrote:
> Attached is a revised Portfile. I am having trouble with
> get_canonical_archflags. After adding to build.post_args-append:
>
> CC="${configure.cc} [get_canonical_archflags cc]" \
> CL="${configure.cc} [get_canonic
Attached is a revised Portfile. I am having trouble with
get_canonical_archflags. After adding to build.post_args-append:
CC="${configure.cc} [get_canonical_archflags cc]" \
CL="${configure.cc} [get_canonical_archflags ld]" \
CXX="${co
On Wed, Mar 21, 2012 at 09:05:08AM +, MacPorts wrote:
> #33709: pymol target missing dependency for freeglut
> ---+
> Reporter: csumma@… | Owner: howarth@…
> Type: defect
14 matches
Mail list logo
