On 2012-4-13 13:40 , Eric Cronin wrote:
> On Apr 12, 2012, at 11:19 PM, Joshua Root wrote:
>> On 2012-4-13 04:47 , Eric Cronin wrote:
>>> Wasn't there a second issue that the filenames for packages don't
>>> include epoch, so there is a risk of grabbing/reusing the package from a
>>> different epoc
On Apr 12, 2012, at 11:19 PM, Joshua Root wrote:
> On 2012-4-13 04:47 , Eric Cronin wrote:
>> On 12.04.2012 10:34, Joshua Root wrote:
>>> On 2012-4-13 00:20 , Jeremy Lavergne wrote:
When the epoch gets put back in, you'll also need to update the
revision.
epoch: 1
version: 4.2
>
On 2012-4-13 04:47 , Eric Cronin wrote:
> On 12.04.2012 10:34, Joshua Root wrote:
>> On 2012-4-13 00:20 , Jeremy Lavergne wrote:
>>> When the epoch gets put back in, you'll also need to update the
>>> revision.
>>> epoch: 1
>>> version: 4.2
>>> revision: 2
>>
>> The bug in the registry API that nec
On 2012-4-13 04:00 , Bradley Giesbrecht wrote:
> Would it be worth the effort to have the build bot exclude replaced_by ports?
>
> Example: libACE
Probably. Patches welcome. :-)
- Josh
___
macports-dev mailing list
macports-dev@lists.macosforge.org
htt
Clearing up the confusion:
This person is referring to the Homebrew package manager.
He mistakenly thinks that because Homebrew works with only the
commandline tools installed, that MacPorts should as well.
As you stated, a full Xcode install is necessary.
Each package manager on OS X (MacPorts
On Apr 12, 2012, at 15:36, jerem...@macports.org wrote:
> Revision: 91893
> https://trac.macports.org/changeset/91893
> Author: jerem...@macports.org
> Date: 2012-04-12 13:36:58 -0700 (Thu, 12 Apr 2012)
> Log Message:
> ---
> lensfun: Use the right linker, and fix +universa
On 12.04.2012 10:34, Joshua Root wrote:
On 2012-4-13 00:20 , Jeremy Lavergne wrote:
When the epoch gets put back in, you'll also need to update the
revision.
epoch: 1
version: 4.2
revision: 2
The bug in the registry API that necessitates that is gone in 2.1
BTW.
Wasn't there a second iss
Would it be worth the effort to have the build bot exclude replaced_by ports?
Example: libACE
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
___
macports-dev mailing list
macports-dev@lists.macosforge.org
http://lists.macosforge.org/mailman/listi
On 04/12/2012 08:27 AM, William Siegrist wrote:
On Apr 11, 2012, at 8:12 PM, Blair Zajac wrote:
On 04/11/2012 08:08 AM, Joshua Root wrote:
On 2012-4-12 01:04 , Blair Zajac wrote:
On 04/11/2012 07:47 AM, Joshua Root wrote:
On 2012-4-10 11:30 , Joshua Root wrote:
Seems like most of the probl
Hello Elmar,
Please reply to the mailing list, not just to me.
http://trac.macports.org/wiki/MailingLists#reply
On 04/12/2012 03:57 PM, Elmar Stellnberger wrote:
> Unfortunately now the build error has changed:
>> port install macfuse
> Error: The installed version of Xcode (2.0orlower) is too ol
On Apr 11, 2012, at 8:12 PM, Blair Zajac wrote:
> On 04/11/2012 08:08 AM, Joshua Root wrote:
>> On 2012-4-12 01:04 , Blair Zajac wrote:
>>> On 04/11/2012 07:47 AM, Joshua Root wrote:
On 2012-4-10 11:30 , Joshua Root wrote:
Seems like most of the problems were caused by ice33-cpp. Still
> The bug in the registry API that necessitates that is gone in 2.1 BTW.
Ah, great!
We'd still need to do it at least two weeks after 2.1 is released :-)
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
___
macports-dev mailing list
macports-dev
On 2012-4-13 00:20 , Jeremy Lavergne wrote:
> When the epoch gets put back in, you'll also need to update the revision.
> epoch: 1
> version: 4.2
> revision: 2
The bug in the registry API that necessitates that is gone in 2.1 BTW.
- Josh
___
macports-de
>> Modified: trunk/dports/science/netcdf-cxx/Portfile
>> ===
>> --- trunk/dports/science/netcdf-cxx/Portfile 2012-04-12 03:38:31 UTC (rev
>> 91864)
>> +++ trunk/dports/science/netcdf-cxx/Portfile 2012-04-12 03:44:42 UTC (rev
>> 91865
14 matches
Mail list logo
