> Although someone always complains when they have to
> install n+1 ports instead of their current n...
Maybe not with pre-built binaries ;-)
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
___
macports-dev mailing list
macports-dev@lists.macosf
On 2012-5-7 00:01 , Daniel Ericsson wrote:
> On 6 maj 2012, at 15:01, Joshua Root wrote:
>
>> On 2012-5-6 22:30 , Daniel Ericsson wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> I want to move mercurial to allow for installation with any version of
>>> Python, that's supported and the user have chosen as their selected v
On May 6, 2012, at 5:05 PM, Ryan Schmidt wrote:
>
> On May 6, 2012, at 19:03, Bjarne D Mathiesen wrote:
>
>> so ... for some reason when using mysql55 postfix cant find
>
> I agree. In any case, you should file a bug report in our issue tracker so
> the maintainer of the port can begin to lo
On May 6, 2012, at 19:03, Bjarne D Mathiesen wrote:
> so ... for some reason when using mysql55 postfix cant find
I agree. In any case, you should file a bug report in our issue tracker so the
maintainer of the port can begin to look into fixing the problem.
_
Ryan Schmidt wrote:
> On May 6, 2012, at 04:19, Bjarne D Mathiesen wrote:
>
>> I'm getting this when building postfix @2.9.2_0 +mysql55
>>
>> port install postfix @2.9.2_0 +mysql51 *works* so it has to be something
>> to do with mysql51 <-> mysql55
>
> [snip]
>
>> Is it a problem in our departme
On May 6, 2012, at 08:35, c...@macports.org wrote:
> Revision: 92772
> https://trac.macports.org/changeset/92772
> Author: c...@macports.org
> Date: 2012-05-06 06:35:43 -0700 (Sun, 06 May 2012)
> Log Message:
> ---
> autopsy: update to 2.24, add evidence locker to destroot.
On May 6, 2012, at 04:19, Bjarne D Mathiesen wrote:
> I'm getting this when building postfix @2.9.2_0 +mysql55
>
> port install postfix @2.9.2_0 +mysql51 *works* so it has to be something
> to do with mysql51 <-> mysql55
[snip]
> Is it a problem in our department -or- an upstrem problem
> -and-
On May 6, 2012, at 06:25, Christoph Iserlohn wrote:
> Am 06.05.12 09:34, schrieb Ryan Schmidt:
>> $ port why-no-binary php54
>> php54 is under the PHP license which is incompatible with the GPL license
>> used by dependency readline
>> ... (possibly additional reasons)
>>
> What´s wrong with "$
On 6 maj 2012, at 21:14, Sean Farley wrote:
>> I didn't go into the fact that there are some ports depending on mercurial
>> and I wanted to give those a target to depend on that included the python
>> version. But with 24, 25 being on the way out and most ports defaulting to
>> 27 it probably
> I didn't go into the fact that there are some ports depending on mercurial
> and I wanted to give those a target to depend on that included the python
> version. But with 24, 25 being on the way out and most ports defaulting to 27
> it probably will be an issue that goes away.
I have about ha
On May 6, 2012, at 12:47 AM, Ryan Schmidt wrote:
>
> On May 6, 2012, at 02:34, Ryan Schmidt wrote:
>
> I guess I should try to make php use libedit instead first and then see what
> else comes up.
I made openssl a non-default variant for mysql55 so binaries could be
distributed not realizing
On May 6, 2012, at 4:25 AM, Christoph Iserlohn wrote:
> Am 06.05.12 09:34, schrieb Ryan Schmidt:
>> $ port why-no-binary php54
>> php54 is under the PHP license which is incompatible with the GPL license
>> used by dependency readline
>> ... (possibly additional reasons)
>>
> What´s wrong with
On 6 maj 2012, at 15:01, Joshua Root wrote:
> On 2012-5-6 22:30 , Daniel Ericsson wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I want to move mercurial to allow for installation with any version of
>> Python, that's supported and the user have chosen as their selected version.
>
> Just take the current portfile and add
On 2012-5-6 22:30 , Daniel Ericsson wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I want to move mercurial to allow for installation with any version of
> Python, that's supported and the user have chosen as their selected version.
> The tickets for this have subsided as most people have settled down on Python
> 2.7 which
Hi,
I want to move mercurial to allow for installation with any version of Python,
that's supported and the user have chosen as their selected version. The
tickets for this have subsided as most people have settled down on Python 2.7
which now is what mercurial has as python.default_version. Bi
Am 06.05.12 09:34, schrieb Ryan Schmidt:
> $ port why-no-binary php54
> php54 is under the PHP license which is incompatible with the GPL license
> used by dependency readline
> ... (possibly additional reasons)
>
What´s wrong with "$ port_binary_distributable.tcl -v php54" ?
Kind regards,
Christ
I'm getting this when building postfix @2.9.2_0 +mysql55
port install postfix @2.9.2_0 +mysql51 *works* so it has to be something
to do with mysql51 <-> mysql55
start debug log +++
+ non-problematic sections skipped +
DEBUG: No need to upgrade! my
On May 6, 2012, at 02:34, Ryan Schmidt wrote:
> I wasn't sure if information about why a binary was not being produced was
> already part of the buildbot's logs. (The buildbot logs are so enormous that
> it's difficult to just look through them.)
At least I find this log which is small and man
On May 5, 2012, at 23:15, Jeremy Lavergne wrote:
>> I'm trying to diagnose why we're not providing binaries of the php ports.
>> I'm guessing it's a license conflict. For example php depends on readline,
>> and readline is under the gpl while php is under the php license, and those
>> are list
19 matches
Mail list logo
