Bjarne D Mathiesen wrote:
> The attached script ought to fix this
Upppsss ... too fast
Corrected script ... hopefully without errors this time ;-)
--
Bjarne D Mathiesen
København N ; Danmark ; Europa
--
denne besked er skrevet i
Ryan Schmidt wrote:
>
> On Jun 7, 2012, at 20:31, Bjarne D Mathiesen wrote:
>
>> Ryan Schmidt wrote:
>>
>>> The way the perl5 portgroup is currently written, the perl5.branches line
>>> must appear before the perl5.setup line. I think it would be nice if it
>>> could appear after that line, but
On Jun 7, 2012, at 9:34 p.m., Ryan Schmidt wrote:
> On Jun 7, 2012, at 20:31, Bjarne D Mathiesen wrote:
>
>> so ... if we had this:
>>
>> PortGroup perl5 1.0
>> default perl5.branches {"5.8 5.10 5.12 5.14 5.16"}
>> perl5.setup YAML 0.73
>>
>> that would satisfy all the require
On Jun 7, 2012, at 20:31, Bjarne D Mathiesen wrote:
> Ryan Schmidt wrote:
>>
>> On Jun 7, 2012, at 17:21, Bjarne D Mathiesen wrote:
>>
>>> MacPorts wrote:
#34784: Add perl5.branches to all p5 ports (adding p5.16 for perl5.16)
-+-
Ryan Schmidt wrote:
>
> On Jun 7, 2012, at 17:21, Bjarne D Mathiesen wrote:
>
>> MacPorts wrote:
>>> #34784: Add perl5.branches to all p5 ports (adding p5.16 for perl5.16)
>>> -+--
>>> Reporter: ryandesign@… |
On Jun 7, 2012, at 17:21, Bjarne D Mathiesen wrote:
> MacPorts wrote:
>> #34784: Add perl5.branches to all p5 ports (adding p5.16 for perl5.16)
>> -+--
>> Reporter: ryandesign@… | Owner: macports-tickets@…
MacPorts wrote:
> #34784: Add perl5.branches to all p5 ports (adding p5.16 for perl5.16)
> -+--
> Reporter: ryandesign@… | Owner: macports-tickets@…
>
> Type: enhancement
On Jun 7, 2012, at 10:13, mm...@macports.org wrote:
> Revision: 94055
> https://trac.macports.org/changeset/94055
> Author: mm...@macports.org
> Date: 2012-06-07 08:13:36 -0700 (Thu, 07 Jun 2012)
> Log Message:
> ---
> math/arpack: change depends_build to depends_lib, remove
On 2012-6-8 01:02 , Jeremy Lavergne wrote:
> This has me wondering: is the code interpreting "apache" to be all versions
> of apache? If the version is missing, I thought it was suppose to default to
> 0.
In a Portfile, you should always specify the applicable version
number(s) for the license (
On 2012-6-8 00:50 , Bradley Giesbrecht wrote:
>
> Would someone help me understand why djvulibre is distributable while
> pdf2djvu is not?
> port_binary_distributable.tcl -v djvulibre
> port_binary_distributable.tcl -v pdf2djvu
>
> Is it the licenses?
The licenses are the only thing the script
> Hop down to "array set license_conflicts" in the code.
>
> These are the conflicts Apache license has with other licenses:
>apache {cecill gpl-1 gpl-2}
>apache-1 {agpl gpl}
>apache-1.1 {agpl gpl}
This has me wondering: is the code interpreting "apache" to be all versions of
apache
> Is it the licenses?
> djvulibre: GPL-2+
> pdf2djvu: GPL-2
> ImageMagick: Apache-2
Hop down to "array set license_conflicts" in the code.
These are the conflicts Apache license has with other licenses:
apache {cecill gpl-1 gpl-2}
apache-1 {agpl gpl}
apache-1.1 {agpl gpl}
Notice gpl
On Jun 7, 2012, at 1:35 AM, Joshua Root wrote:
> On 2012-6-7 09:16 , Bradley Giesbrecht wrote:
>>
>> It's not so much that the tasks are related but rather that rev-upgrade is
>> already testing all the links so it seems like an efficient place to test
>> the license of files port. See below f
On 2012-6-7 09:16 , Bradley Giesbrecht wrote:
>
> It's not so much that the tasks are related but rather that rev-upgrade is
> already testing all the links so it seems like an efficient place to test the
> license of files port. See below for what appears to be a case where no files
> are actu
14 matches
Mail list logo
