Re: [96665] trunk/dports/devel

2012-08-17 Thread Blair Zajac
On 08/17/2012 06:07 AM, Daniel J. Luke wrote: On Aug 16, 2012, at 8:53 PM, Blair Zajac wrote: I was thinking we leave the subversion-python2?bindings alone, rename py2?-svn to py2?-pysvn because that's the real name of the package. In a year, rename subversion-python2?bindings to py2?-svn.

CMake: FindXYZ.cmake install directory?

2012-08-17 Thread Craig Miller
I'm working on a port that has a FindXYZ.cmake file as one of it's files. I'm having a lot of trouble getting this file installed to a location where it can be found. If I install FindXYZ.cmake to the /opt/local/cmake-2.8/Modules path it will be found and my XYZ libs/includes will also be foun

Re: [96718] trunk/dports/_resources/port1.0/group/python-1.0.tcl

2012-08-17 Thread Blair Zajac
On 08/17/2012 04:15 PM, Blair Zajac wrote: On 08/17/2012 04:06 PM, Ryan Schmidt wrote: On Aug 17, 2012, at 17:05, bl...@macports.org wrote: Revision: 96718 https://trac.macports.org/changeset/96718 Author: bl...@macports.org Date: 2012-08-17 15:05:18 -0700 (Fri, 17 Aug 2012) L

Re: [96718] trunk/dports/_resources/port1.0/group/python-1.0.tcl

2012-08-17 Thread Blair Zajac
On 08/17/2012 04:06 PM, Ryan Schmidt wrote: On Aug 17, 2012, at 17:05, bl...@macports.org wrote: Revision: 96718 https://trac.macports.org/changeset/96718 Author: bl...@macports.org Date: 2012-08-17 15:05:18 -0700 (Fri, 17 Aug 2012) Log Message: --- python-1.0.tcl: rena

Re: Adding ${python.branch} without the . to Python groups

2012-08-17 Thread Ryan Schmidt
On Aug 17, 2012, at 13:02, Blair Zajac wrote: > I'm working on unifying py2{5,6,7}-logilab-astng and they all depend upon the > corresponding $py2{5,6,7}-logilab-common. Can we add to the python groups > another variable without the . in it, so I can do > > depends_lib-append port:py{python

Re: [96712] trunk/dports/_resources/port1.0/group/python25-1.0.tcl

2012-08-17 Thread Ryan Schmidt
On Aug 17, 2012, at 18:07, Ryan Schmidt wrote: > > On Aug 17, 2012, at 15:53, bl...@macports.org wrote: > >> Revision: 96712 >> https://trac.macports.org/changeset/96712 >> Author: bl...@macports.org >> Date: 2012-08-17 13:53:28 -0700 (Fri, 17 Aug 2012) >> Log Message: >>

Re: [96712] trunk/dports/_resources/port1.0/group/python25-1.0.tcl

2012-08-17 Thread Ryan Schmidt
On Aug 17, 2012, at 15:53, bl...@macports.org wrote: > Revision: 96712 > https://trac.macports.org/changeset/96712 > Author: bl...@macports.org > Date: 2012-08-17 13:53:28 -0700 (Fri, 17 Aug 2012) > Log Message: > --- > python25-1.0.tcl: rename files in ${prefix}/bin to end

Re: [96718] trunk/dports/_resources/port1.0/group/python-1.0.tcl

2012-08-17 Thread Ryan Schmidt
On Aug 17, 2012, at 17:05, bl...@macports.org wrote: > Revision: 96718 > https://trac.macports.org/changeset/96718 > Author: bl...@macports.org > Date: 2012-08-17 15:05:18 -0700 (Fri, 17 Aug 2012) > Log Message: > --- > python-1.0.tcl: rename Python 2.{4,5} files in ${prefi

Re: Adding ${python.branch} without the . to Python groups

2012-08-17 Thread Blair Zajac
On 08/17/2012 11:43 AM, Jeremy Lavergne wrote: So ${python.version} is changed if a subport is active? That's non-intuitive. If you're defining a port multiple times for various python versions, how else would define it as a variable? Sorry, trying to do too many things at the same time, I

Re: Adding ${python.branch} without the . to Python groups

2012-08-17 Thread Blair Zajac
On 08/17/2012 11:37 AM, Lawrence Velázquez wrote: On Aug 17, 2012, at 2:02 PM, Blair Zajac wrote: Can we add to the python groups another variable without the . in it, so I can do depends_lib-append port:py{python.SOMETHING}-logilab-common What should we call SOMETHING? No need to add an

Re: Adding ${python.branch} without the . to Python groups

2012-08-17 Thread Jeremy Lavergne
> So ${python.version} is changed if a subport is active? That's non-intuitive. If you're defining a port multiple times for various python versions, how else would define it as a variable? > The ports I'm converting are currently not a subport, does that work > regardless? It should still be

Re: Adding ${python.branch} without the . to Python groups

2012-08-17 Thread Blair Zajac
On 08/17/2012 11:39 AM, Rainer Müller wrote: On 2012-08-17 20:02, Blair Zajac wrote: I'm working on unifying py2{5,6,7}-logilab-astng and they all depend upon the corresponding $py2{5,6,7}-logilab-common. Can we add to the python groups another variable without the . in it, so I can do depends

Re: Adding ${python.branch} without the . to Python groups

2012-08-17 Thread Lawrence Velázquez
On Aug 17, 2012, at 2:02 PM, Blair Zajac wrote: > Can we add to the python groups another variable without the . in it, so I > can do > > depends_lib-append port:py{python.SOMETHING}-logilab-common > > What should we call SOMETHING? No need to add anything. Use "python.version". vq

Re: Adding ${python.branch} without the . to Python groups

2012-08-17 Thread Rainer Müller
On 2012-08-17 20:02, Blair Zajac wrote: > I'm working on unifying py2{5,6,7}-logilab-astng and they all depend upon the > corresponding $py2{5,6,7}-logilab-common. Can we add to the python groups > another variable without the . in it, so I can do > > depends_lib-append port:py{python.SOMETHING}

Adding ${python.branch} without the . to Python groups

2012-08-17 Thread Blair Zajac
I'm working on unifying py2{5,6,7}-logilab-astng and they all depend upon the corresponding $py2{5,6,7}-logilab-common. Can we add to the python groups another variable without the . in it, so I can do depends_lib-append port:py{python.SOMETHING}-logilab-common What should we call SOMETHING?

Re: macports-clang-3.2

2012-08-17 Thread Jeremy Huddleston Sequoia
On Aug 16, 2012, at 16:41, Ryan Schmidt wrote: >> I would also find this useful, as I would like to use the 3.2 macports clang >> version as a possible compiler for the ROOT port, to support cling. >> >> As a side question If 3.2 is not released, how does it then related to the >> Xcode versi

Re: compile a source code modified with macport

2012-08-17 Thread Rainer Müller
Hello, On 08/17/2012 11:41 AM, Michaël Parchet wrote: > I try to compile a customized gimp version with the attached portfile. the > source url syntax is it ok ? > > Is that it will compile correctly my source code ? The gimp port is actually just a meta port that defines dependencies on many

Why do Macports force me to build universal?

2012-08-17 Thread Vincent Habchi
Hi folks! when I try to compile clang 3.1 on my MacPro G5/10.5.8, despite having -universal set as a default variant, Macports insists on building Python27 universal. I’ve attached the log below. At some point, a line – that I prefixed with – informs me that the universal variant is enforc

Re: [96665] trunk/dports/devel

2012-08-17 Thread Daniel J. Luke
On Aug 16, 2012, at 8:53 PM, Blair Zajac wrote: > I was thinking we leave the subversion-python2?bindings alone, rename > py2?-svn to py2?-pysvn because that's the real name of the package. In a > year, rename subversion-python2?bindings to py2?-svn. Isn't the name of the > package supposed t

compile a source code modified with macport

2012-08-17 Thread Michaël Parchet
Portfile Description: Binary data Hello, I try to compile a customized gimp version with the attached portfile. the source url syntax is it ok ? Is that it will compile correctly my source code ? Tanks for your answer Best regards mparchet ___