Re: Alternate build directory for CMake-based port?

On Aug 23, 2012, at 09:39, Kevin Reid wrote: > GNU Radio also insists that the build directory be different from the source > directory There are many ports using the cmake portgroup that do this, using commands like the ones shown earlier in this thread. Some months ago I added to my to-do

Re: How can variant B imply variant A?

On Aug 21, 2012, at 15:26, Jeremy Lavergne wrote: > Clemens: i.e., abort the build and tell the user: you have glib2-devel, > please build with +glib2_devel I'll just chime in about this point. I don't remember why libpixman-devel, cairo-devel, pango-devel and glib2-devel were originally creat

Re: [96969] trunk/dports/aqua/xrg/Portfile

On 2012-8-24 00:51 , Jeremy Lavergne wrote: > Well, the github repo doesn't have tags or premade downloads ready: we'd have > to pick commit. > > It looks like he's marking his version-update commits: > https://github.com/mikepj/XRG/commit/ca9fe709eae79fab3a4eeffbf67d5c4009013d4c > https://github

Re: Alternate build directory for CMake-based port?

On 2012-8-24 00:51 , Bradley Giesbrecht wrote: > > On Aug 23, 2012, at 7:45 AM, Joshua Root wrote: > >> On 2012-8-24 00:39 , Kevin Reid wrote: >>> I am interested in getting the GNU Radio ports (gnuradio-*) updated to the >>> latest version. (Relevant ticket:

Re: [96969] trunk/dports/aqua/xrg/Portfile

> Well, I think it's either that or use a github-generated source tarball > from the appropriate commit. > > (It's not inherently breaking its own license BTW; the copyright holder > doesn't need a license and can distribute binaries to whoever he likes. > As it stands, it's just impossible for an

Re: Alternate build directory for CMake-based port?

On Aug 23, 2012, at 7:45 AM, Joshua Root wrote: > On 2012-8-24 00:39 , Kevin Reid wrote: >> I am interested in getting the GNU Radio ports (gnuradio-*) updated to the >> latest version. (Relevant ticket: . >> The maintainer has acknowledged the problem bu

Re: Alternate build directory for CMake-based port?

On 2012-8-24 00:39 , Kevin Reid wrote: > I am interested in getting the GNU Radio ports (gnuradio-*) updated to the > latest version. (Relevant ticket: . > The maintainer has acknowledged the problem but no work has been done for 11 > months.) I have not s

Re: Alternate build directory for CMake-based port?

On Thu, Aug 23, 2012 at 4:39 PM, Kevin Reid wrote: > I am interested in getting the GNU Radio ports (gnuradio-*) updated to the > latest version. (Relevant ticket: . > The maintainer has acknowledged the problem but no work has been done for 11 > months.)

Re: [96969] trunk/dports/aqua/xrg/Portfile

On 2012-8-24 00:32 , Jeremy Lavergne wrote: >> There may actually be a license compliance issue here since the license >> changed to GPL. We have to either make the source available along with >> the binaries, or include a written offer to give the source to anyone >> who asks for it (or pass on so

Alternate build directory for CMake-based port?

I am interested in getting the GNU Radio ports (gnuradio-*) updated to the latest version. (Relevant ticket: . The maintainer has acknowledged the problem but no work has been done for 11 months.) I have not seriously attempted to work on portfiles before.

Re: [96969] trunk/dports/aqua/xrg/Portfile

> There may actually be a license compliance issue here since the license > changed to GPL. We have to either make the source available along with > the binaries, or include a written offer to give the source to anyone > who asks for it (or pass on someone else's such written offer). Being > able t

Re: [96969] trunk/dports/aqua/xrg/Portfile

On 2012-8-23 23:44 , Jeremy Lavergne wrote: > Thanks guys :-D > https://trac.macports.org/changeset/96969 There may actually be a license compliance issue here since the license changed to GPL. We have to either make the source available along with the binaries, or include a written offer to give