Re: Prebuilt alternatives

2012-09-25 Thread Kenneth Miller
Thanks, this is the reply that I was looking for. Sorry, wish I would have found that first, but I didn't know where to look or what phrase to google after I had already looked for a while. From: Brandon Allbery To: Kenneth Miller Cc: "macports-us...@lists.

Re: Prebuilt alternatives

2012-09-25 Thread Kenneth Miller
Yeah you're right, I guess I should have thought about that. But then again, there could be a minimal trusted base, but that's a matter for another argument, my question has been answered.  From: Clemens Lang To: Kenneth Miller Cc: macports-dev@lists.macosfo

Re: [98135] trunk/dports/aqua/Platypus44/Portfile

2012-09-25 Thread Ryan Schmidt
On Sep 25, 2012, at 14:54, and.dam...@macports.org wrote: > Revision: 98135 > http://trac.macports.org//changeset/98135 > Author: and.dam...@macports.org > Date: 2012-09-25 12:54:46 -0700 (Tue, 25 Sep 2012) > Log Message: > --- > port platypus44: removing livecheck since th

Re: new chemoinformatics port: cmake & "Framework ApplicationServices not found"

2012-09-25 Thread Ryan Schmidt
On Sep 25, 2012, at 18:36, Mojca Miklavec wrote: > I would like to try to install Indigo > (http://ggasoftware.com/opensource/indigo) to be able to draw chemical > formulas in TeX. > > I'm attaching my first attempts to create a Portfile, however I'm stuck with >ERROR: Framework ApplicationS

new chemoinformatics port: cmake & "Framework ApplicationServices not found"

2012-09-25 Thread Mojca Miklavec
Hello, I would like to try to install Indigo (http://ggasoftware.com/opensource/indigo) to be able to draw chemical formulas in TeX. I'm attaching my first attempts to create a Portfile, however I'm stuck with ERROR: Framework ApplicationServices not found in CMake. The build nevertheless sta

Re: Builbot failure odditiy

2012-09-25 Thread William Siegrist
On Sep 25, 2012, at 12:21 PM, Andrea D'Amore wrote: > On Tue, Sep 25, 2012 at 9:04 PM, William Siegrist wrote: >> There's a duplicate Platypus port. > > Nvm, I forgot to correctly set Platypus44's name. > > Linting would have shown it. > Post-commit linting was broken, but it should be fixe

Re: Prebuilt alternatives

2012-09-25 Thread Clemens Lang
On Tue, Sep 25, 2012 at 11:05:51AM -0700, Kenneth Miller wrote: > I feel like this could be a distributed building process for > everyone-why not have port check a server to see if something has been > built before (in a similar environment) prior to trying to build > locally? Are you suggesting M

Re: Builbot failure odditiy

2012-09-25 Thread William Siegrist
On Sep 25, 2012, at 12:14 PM, Andrea D'Amore wrote: > On Tue, Sep 25, 2012 at 9:04 PM, William Siegrist wrote: >> There's a duplicate Platypus port. > > Where is this duplicate? Is it the same port from previous commit, > that is Platypus @4.4 is conflicting with Platypus @4.7 ? You committed

Re: Builbot failure odditiy

2012-09-25 Thread Andrea D'Amore
On Tue, Sep 25, 2012 at 9:04 PM, William Siegrist wrote: > There's a duplicate Platypus port. Nvm, I forgot to correctly set Platypus44's name. Linting would have shown it. -- Andrea ___ macports-dev mailing list macports-dev@lists.macosforge.org htt

Re: Builbot failure odditiy

2012-09-25 Thread Andrea D'Amore
On Tue, Sep 25, 2012 at 9:04 PM, William Siegrist wrote: > There's a duplicate Platypus port. Where is this duplicate? Is it the same port from previous commit, that is Platypus @4.4 is conflicting with Platypus @4.7 ? -- Andrea ___ macports-dev mai

Re: Builbot failure odditiy

2012-09-25 Thread William Siegrist
it, from what I can see this happens > with every new port. > In this case Platypus44 had just been created from Platypus port. > > Can you look into it or provide the log file > /buildbot/ports-slave/buildports-lion-x86_64/build/logs-20120925-111844 > ? > > > [1] h

Re: [98023] trunk/dports/aqua/emacs-app/Portfile

2012-09-25 Thread Sean Farley
On Mon, Sep 24, 2012 at 3:40 AM, Ryan Schmidt wrote: > > On Sep 23, 2012, at 12:18, Sean Farley wrote: > >> Speaking of which, could we please allow the use of fullscreen on Lion >> or above *without* using Apple's "fullscreen?" i.e. I don't want a new >> desktop when emacs goes fullscreen. > > Th

Re: wxWidgets vs. wxWidgets-devel: a proposal

2012-09-25 Thread Andrea D'Amore
On Tue, Sep 25, 2012 at 5:25 PM, Kuba Ober wrote: > Ok, I presume we can keep the port names and only issue wxWidgets28 when > 30 becomes stable. So I won't be pushing for any wxWidgets port renaming. > 1. Some wxWidgets-using projects abandoned support for 2.8. What projects? > 2. Even for pro

Re: Prebuilt alternatives

2012-09-25 Thread Chris Jones
Hi, > (b) If you are on a supported platform (currently 10.6 / 10.7 Intel x86 / > x86-64) using default variants and with default install path, *and* the > port's license permits binary redistribution, *and* you have not forced > source only with -s or the appropriate macports.conf configuratio

Re: Prebuilt alternatives

2012-09-25 Thread Joshua Root
On 2012-9-26 04:05 , Kenneth Miller wrote: > Why does macports insist on using only local builds? It doesn't. If a prebuilt package is available, it will be used. There are a number of reasons why one might not be. - Josh ___ macports-dev mailing list m

Re: wxWidgets vs. wxWidgets-devel: a proposal

2012-09-25 Thread Kuba Ober
Ok, I presume we can keep the port names and only issue wxWidgets28 when 30 becomes stable. So I won't be pushing for any wxWidgets port renaming. There are two issues, then: 1. Some wxWidgets-using projects abandoned support for 2.8. 2. Even for projects that support both 2.8 and 2.9, like, say

Re: wxWidgets vs. wxWidgets-devel: a proposal

2012-09-25 Thread Andrea D'Amore
On Fri, Sep 21, 2012 at 3:50 PM, Kuba Ober wrote: > I'm trying to get wxWidgets and packages that use it running on 64 bit cocoa > systems. Obviously > the way forward is to get everything on wxWidgets 2.9, but for some packages > it may not be > possible just yet. Here's what I propose: > - re

Re: wxWidgets vs. wxWidgets-devel: a proposal

2012-09-25 Thread Ryan Schmidt
On Sep 25, 2012, at 03:24, Wahlstedt Jyrki wrote: > On 22.9.2012, at 10.32, Ryan Schmidt wrote: > >> We could take the approach that we take in some other ports, when versions >> are so different that other ports will need to be able to choose among them: >> always use a suffix, and make the p

Re: wxWidgets vs. wxWidgets-devel: a proposal

2012-09-25 Thread Mojca Miklavec
On Tue, Sep 25, 2012 at 10:24 AM, Wahlstedt Jyrki wrote: > On 22.9.2012, at 10.32, Ryan Schmidt wrote: > >> So under this plan, we would rename wxWidgets to wxWidgets28, we would >> rename wxWidgets-devel to wxWidgets210 or wxWidgets30, and we'd update all >> ports' dependencies according to the

Re: wxWidgets vs. wxWidgets-devel: a proposal

2012-09-25 Thread Wahlstedt Jyrki
On 22.9.2012, at 10.32, Ryan Schmidt wrote: > We could take the approach that we take in some other ports, when versions > are so different that other ports will need to be able to choose among them: > always use a suffix, and make the ports simultaneously installable by > installing to diffe