Re: [MacPorts] #36754: new version of pb2make

2012-11-12 Thread Ryan Schmidt
Steve, I apologize that we've not delivered the response you expected. I agree that our ticket guidelines and port submission and update process are not as streamlined as perhaps they could be. Sorry that my initial response to you was short; I had probably dealt with a lot of other tickets th

Re: [MacPorts] #36754: new version of pb2make

2012-11-12 Thread Craig Treleaven
At 1:17 PM +1100 11/13/12, steve jenkin wrote: [...much vitriolic name-calling and complaining deleted...] Not impressed at all with your operation. -- Steve Jenkin, Info Tech, Systems and Design Specialist. 0412 786 915 (+61 412 786 915) PO Box 48, Kippax ACT 2615, AUSTRALIA

Re: [MacPorts] #36754: new version of pb2make

2012-11-12 Thread steve jenkin
MacPorts wrote on 12/11/12 10:11 PM: > #36754: new version of pb2make > --+ > Reporter: stevej098@… | Owner: macports-tickets@… > Type: update | Status: new > Priority: Normal | Milestone: > Component:

Re: [99618] trunk/dports/lang/qore-xml-module/Portfile

2012-11-12 Thread Ryan Schmidt
On Nov 12, 2012, at 01:00, davidnich...@macports.org wrote: > Revision: 99618 > http://trac.macports.org//changeset/99618 > Author: davidnich...@macports.org > Date: 2012-11-11 23:00:28 -0800 (Sun, 11 Nov 2012) > Log Message: > --- > updated to v1.1 > > Modified Paths: > -

Re: [99599] trunk/dports/office/todotxt/Portfile

2012-11-12 Thread Rainer Müller
On 2012-11-12 09:00, Andrea D'Amore wrote: > Why? Users that already installed the package don't need the change. The files installed on disk changed. Reinstalling this port will place files in different locations. A single Portfile revision is meant to be reproducible. The only reason not to incr

Re: [99172] trunk/dports/devel/soprano/Portfile

2012-11-12 Thread Andrea D'Amore
On Sat, Nov 10, 2012 at 10:36 AM, Joshua Root wrote: > That page does list the correct address. I guess an alias wouldn't hurt > though. My bad, I just noticed I used macports.org rather than macosforge.org as domain part. -- Andrea ___ macports-dev ma

Re: [99599] trunk/dports/office/todotxt/Portfile

2012-11-12 Thread Andrea D'Amore
Why? Users that already installed the package don't need the change. Of course this is a no-configure/no-build package with an upgrade time of second(s), so this is just for the sake of discussion but I'm curious if it's just a "stick to the rule" suggestion or it hides some actual issue that I ma