Hi All,
I'm a new committer, so, Hi everyone. I'm a 23 y/o Australian, I just
graduated with a Computer Science Degree this year and I'm going
back for honours next year. My interests are functional programming
(Haskell, Clojure, Scheme) and numerical analysis.
Wrt. The Haskell platform, it's a p
On 2012-12-23 17:28 , Ryan Schmidt wrote:
>
> On Dec 22, 2012, at 15:11, Joshua Root wrote:
>
>> Not all dependents will need rev bumping, only those that link against
>> the libs. Some will just be running scripts in the interpreter, and that
>> should be highly backward compatible.
>
> Yeah bu
How about a port name tcl8.6. i have as well submitted sometime agoa a
port named tcl84 for the apps still depending on it.
-gustaf neumann
Am 22.12.12 22:11, schrieb Joshua Root:
On 2012-12-23 07:25 , Jeremy Huddleston Sequoia wrote:
ok, then please:
revbump tcl
add --disable-threads to the
On 2012-12-23 03:55, Ryan Schmidt wrote:
>> I just read through the documentation for Trac again and found the
>> solution just now. It's not a real but, but special quoting needs to be
>> applied according to the rules for TracLinks (I was only looking at the
>> TracQuery documentation yesterday).
On Dec 23, 2012, at 02:04, vincent habchi wrote:
> On 23 déc. 2012, at 07:28, Ryan Schmidt wrote:
>
>> It's the same conundrum I find myself in when ImageMagick's library version
>> number changes. How to find which ports link with the magick libraries
>> (which need a revbump) and those that j
On 23 déc. 2012, at 07:28, Ryan Schmidt wrote:
> It's the same conundrum I find myself in when ImageMagick's library version
> number changes. How to find which ports link with the magick libraries (which
> need a revbump) and those that just run the ImageMagick programs (which
> don't)?
Were
