On 1/1/13 9:47 PM, Joshua Root wrote:
Revision: 100945
https://trac.macports.org/changeset/100945
Author: blair at macports.org
Date: 2013-01-01 15:44:59 -0800 (Tue, 01 Jan 2013)
Log Message:
---
fwknop: add license.
Modified Paths:
--
trunk/dports/net/f
> Revision: 100945
> https://trac.macports.org/changeset/100945
> Author: blair at macports.org
> Date: 2013-01-01 15:44:59 -0800 (Tue, 01 Jan 2013)
> Log Message:
> ---
> fwknop: add license.
>
> Modified Paths:
> --
> trunk/dports/net/fwknop/Portfile
>
>
Looks like devans already did this in r100850.
Dan
--
Dan R. K. PortsUW CSEhttp://drkp.net/
___
macports-dev mailing list
macports-dev@lists.macosforge.org
http://lists.macosforge.org/mailman/listinfo/macports-dev
> Revision: 100953
> https://trac.macports.org/changeset/100953
> Author: hum at macports.org
> Date: 2013-01-01 18:07:49 -0800 (Tue, 01 Jan 2013)
> Log Message:
> ---
> normalizeNumexp: fix depends_lib to add port:pkgconfig.
>
> Modified Paths:
> --
> trunk
On 2013-1-2 15:52 , Jeremy Lavergne wrote:
> $ sudo port -d rev-upgrade
> DEBUG: Ignoring loadcommand containing @executable_path in
> /Applications/MacPorts/TeXShop.app/Contents/MacOS/TeXShop
> DEBUG: Ignoring loadcommand containing @executable_path in
> /Applications/MacPorts/MacVim.app/Content
Any US east coast devs: does the French mirror get used often for your archive
downloads?
>From Boston, MA lil.fr.packages.macports.org responds faster to pings than
>packages.macports.org. Since MacPorts uses ping time to calculate where to
>make its initial requests from, we might be sendin
$ sudo port -d rev-upgrade
DEBUG: Ignoring loadcommand containing @executable_path in
/Applications/MacPorts/TeXShop.app/Contents/MacOS/TeXShop
DEBUG: Ignoring loadcommand containing @executable_path in
/Applications/MacPorts/MacVim.app/Contents/MacOS/MacVim
---> Scanning binaries for linking er
On Jan 1, 2013, at 3:49 PM, vincent habchi wrote:
> Thanks! I thought one could get rid of the epoch after a version upgrade. Was
> obviously wrong. I still have much to learn! ;)
Yeah, this is a little confusing. You can think of one big version number:
[epoch].[version].[revision]
This
Franck,
The epoch cannot be deleted. Right now, no one will see this update. I put it
back in r100935.
Thanks! I thought one could get rid of the epoch after a version upgrade. Was
obviously wrong. I still have much to learn! ;)
Cheers and happy new year!
Vince
__
Vince,
The epoch cannot be deleted. Right now, no one will see this update. I put it
back in r100935.
Cheers!
Frank
On Jan 1, 2013, at 1:21 AM, vi...@macports.org wrote:
> Revision
> 100921
> Author
> vi...@macports.org
> Date
> 2013-01-01 00:21:03 -0800 (Tue, 01 Jan 2013)
> Log Message
>
10 matches
Mail list logo