Re: [100985] trunk/dports/math

2013-01-02 Thread Michael Feiri
On 02.01.2013, at 21:35, Ryan Schmidt wrote: > > On Jan 2, 2013, at 13:47, mfe...@macports.org wrote: > >> Revision: 100985 >> https://trac.macports.org/changeset/100985 >> Author: mfe...@macports.org >> Date: 2013-01-02 11:47:58 -0800 (Wed, 02 Jan 2013) >> Log Message: >> ---

Where to include port version in 'port pkg' output?

2013-01-02 Thread Blair Zajac
On my testing on 10.7, the package that is generated from 'port pkg' doesn't contain any version info, so it looks like Mac OS X treats it as a 1.0 package. Given I don't know anything about Mac OS X packaging and need this for an internal project, where is the appropriate place to put a versio

Re: [100985] trunk/dports/math

2013-01-02 Thread Ryan Schmidt
On Jan 2, 2013, at 13:47, mfe...@macports.org wrote: > Revision: 100985 > https://trac.macports.org/changeset/100985 > Author: mfe...@macports.org > Date: 2013-01-02 11:47:58 -0800 (Wed, 02 Jan 2013) > Log Message: > --- > new port: itpp > > Added Paths: > --- >

Re: [100945] trunk/dports/net/fwknop/Portfile

2013-01-02 Thread Ryan Schmidt
On Jan 2, 2013, at 13:42, Daniel J. Luke wrote: > On Jan 2, 2013, at 2:25 PM, Blair Zajac wrote: >> BTW, there are other ports that have a mixture of licenses in them. For >> example, the old Subversion 1.6.x distributed some utility scripts that are >> GPL, even though Subversion is Apache-2.

Re: [100945] trunk/dports/net/fwknop/Portfile

2013-01-02 Thread Daniel J. Luke
On Jan 2, 2013, at 2:25 PM, Blair Zajac wrote: > BTW, there are other ports that have a mixture of licenses in them. For > example, the old Subversion 1.6.x distributed some utility scripts that are > GPL, even though Subversion is Apache-2. So what do we do in that case? In that specific c

Re: [100945] trunk/dports/net/fwknop/Portfile

2013-01-02 Thread Blair Zajac
On 01/02/2013 12:48 AM, Joshua Root wrote: On 2013-1-2 17:42 , Blair Zajac wrote: On 1/1/13 9:47 PM, Joshua Root wrote: Revision: 100945 https://trac.macports.org/changeset/100945 Author: blair at macports.org Date: 2013-01-01 15:44:59 -0800 (Tue, 01 Jan 2013) Log Message: ---

Re: packages.macports.org ping time

2013-01-02 Thread Daniel J. Luke
On Jan 2, 2013, at 12:05 PM, Jeremy Lavergne wrote: >>> Any US east coast devs: does the French mirror get used often for your >>> archive downloads? >>> >>> From Boston, MA lil.fr.packages.macports.org responds faster to pings than >>> packages.macports.org. Since MacPorts uses ping time to ca

Re: packages.macports.org ping time

2013-01-02 Thread Jeremy Lavergne
>> Any US east coast devs: does the French mirror get used often for your >> archive downloads? >> >> From Boston, MA lil.fr.packages.macports.org responds faster to pings than >> packages.macports.org. Since MacPorts uses ping time to calculate where to >> make its initial requests from, we mi

Re: packages.macports.org ping time

2013-01-02 Thread Daniel J. Luke
On Jan 1, 2013, at 11:54 PM, Jeremy Lavergne wrote: > Any US east coast devs: does the French mirror get used often for your > archive downloads? > >> From Boston, MA lil.fr.packages.macports.org responds faster to pings than >> packages.macports.org. Since MacPorts uses ping time to calculate

Re: texlive-bin needs revbump from poppler update (r100849)

2013-01-02 Thread Jeremy Lavergne
> It already got one in r100850. Ah, thanks. Sorry about the noise. ___ macports-dev mailing list macports-dev@lists.macosforge.org http://lists.macosforge.org/mailman/listinfo/macports-dev

Re: [100945] trunk/dports/net/fwknop/Portfile

2013-01-02 Thread Joshua Root
On 2013-1-2 17:42 , Blair Zajac wrote: > On 1/1/13 9:47 PM, Joshua Root wrote: >>> Revision: 100945 >>>https://trac.macports.org/changeset/100945 >>> Author: blair at macports.org >>> Date: 2013-01-01 15:44:59 -0800 (Tue, 01 Jan 2013) >>> Log Message: >>> --- >>> fwknop: a