Re: Where to include port version in 'port pkg' output?

2013-01-08 Thread Blair Zajac
On 1/8/13 8:51 PM, Blair Zajac wrote: On 1/5/13 2:46 PM, Blair Zajac wrote: On 01/05/2013 02:21 PM, Chris Jones wrote: On 5 Jan 2013, at 10:16pm, Blair Zajac wrote: On 01/05/2013 02:12 PM, Chris Jones wrote: Hi, On 5 Jan 2013, at 09:53 PM, Ryan Schmidt wrote: It seems unfortunate to ma

Re: Where to include port version in 'port pkg' output?

2013-01-08 Thread Blair Zajac
On 1/5/13 2:46 PM, Blair Zajac wrote: On 01/05/2013 02:21 PM, Chris Jones wrote: On 5 Jan 2013, at 10:16pm, Blair Zajac wrote: On 01/05/2013 02:12 PM, Chris Jones wrote: Hi, On 5 Jan 2013, at 09:53 PM, Ryan Schmidt wrote: It seems unfortunate to make the epoch user-visible at all, since

Re: Revision bump when fixing man page?

2013-01-08 Thread Blair Zajac
On 01/08/2013 04:26 PM, Ryan Schmidt wrote: On Jan 8, 2013, at 17:03, Frank Schima wrote: On Jan 8, 2013, at 2:28 PM, Lawrence Velázquez wrote: Is fixing a broken man page (or broken documentation, in general) worth a rev bump? The current zsh has a broken zshall(1). Yes. Anytime the inst

Re: Revision bump when fixing man page?

2013-01-08 Thread Ryan Schmidt
On Jan 8, 2013, at 17:03, Frank Schima wrote: > On Jan 8, 2013, at 2:28 PM, Lawrence Velázquez wrote: > >> Is fixing a broken man page (or broken documentation, in general) worth a >> rev bump? The current zsh has a broken zshall(1). > > Yes. Anytime the installed files change or a dependency

Re: Revision bump when fixing man page?

2013-01-08 Thread Frank Schima
On Jan 8, 2013, at 2:28 PM, Lawrence Velázquez wrote: > Is fixing a broken man page (or broken documentation, in general) worth a rev > bump? The current zsh has a broken zshall(1). Yes. Anytime the installed files change or a dependency changes but the version does not, the port should get a

Revision bump when fixing man page?

2013-01-08 Thread Lawrence Velázquez
Hi, Is fixing a broken man page (or broken documentation, in general) worth a rev bump? The current zsh has a broken zshall(1). vq ___ macports-dev mailing list macports-dev@lists.macosforge.org http://lists.macosforge.org/mailman/listinfo/macports-dev

Re: [100759] trunk/dports/lang/g95

2013-01-08 Thread Ryan Schmidt
On Dec 23, 2012, at 01:22, take...@macports.org wrote: > Revision: 100759 > https://trac.macports.org/changeset/100759 > Author: take...@macports.org > Date: 2012-12-22 23:22:52 -0800 (Sat, 22 Dec 2012) > Log Message: > --- > g95: revamped for 0.93. > * Removed gcc40. > ---

Re: [101250] users/g5pw/dports/python

2013-01-08 Thread Aljaž Srebrnič
On 08/gen/2013, at 02:06, Ryan Schmidt wrote: > > On Jan 7, 2013, at 04:47, g...@macports.org wrote: > >> Revision: 101250 >> https://trac.macports.org/changeset/101250 >> Author: g...@macports.org >> Date: 2013-01-07 02:47:53 -0800 (Mon, 07 Jan 2013) >> Log Message: >> --