On Mar 27, 2013, at 9:47 AM, Daniel J. Luke wrote:
> On Mar 27, 2013, at 9:40 AM, Daniel J. Luke wrote:
>> On Mar 26, 2013, at 10:02 PM, Ryan Schmidt wrote:
>>> On Mar 26, 2013, at 20:55, "Daniel J. Luke" wrote:
On Mar 26, 2013, at 8:28 PM, ryandes...@macports.org wrote:
>
> +
Lawrence Velázquez writes:
> On Mar 25, 2013, at 3:58 PM, Sean Farley wrote:
>
>> Joshua Root writes:
>>
>>> On 2013-3-26 05:44 , Sean Farley wrote:
I would say it is worth it because currently there is no sane way to
specify a sole fortran compiler.
>>>
>>> What do you mean by
On Mar 28, 2013, at 2:03 PM, Ryan Schmidt wrote:
>
> On Mar 28, 2013, at 11:36, Ben Smith wrote:
>
>> As someone who has used the github portgroup in the past, I'm wondering if
>> there is an agreed upon new download area for github projects (since Github
>> depreciated downloads). For insta
On Mar 28, 2013, at 11:36, Ben Smith wrote:
> As someone who has used the github portgroup in the past, I'm wondering if
> there is an agreed upon new download area for github projects (since Github
> depreciated downloads). For instance, should we all have a folder under
> tree/master where w
On 2013-3-29 03:36 , Ben Smith wrote:
> Hi Folks -
>
> As someone who has used the github portgroup in the past, I'm wondering
> if there is an agreed upon new download area for github projects (since
> Github depreciated downloads). For instance, should we all have a folder
> under tree/master wh
Hi Folks -
As someone who has used the github portgroup in the past, I'm wondering if
there is an agreed upon new download area for github projects (since Github
depreciated downloads). For instance, should we all have a folder under
tree/master where we place the tar.gz files?
I want to make sur
On 2013-03-28, at 12:51 AM, MacPorts wrote:
#38565: atlas @3.10.1_3: configuration fails
--+--
Reporter: jdgleeson@… | Owner: vince@…
Type: defect | Status: assigned
Priority: Normal | Milestone:
Component: ports
