On 06/14/2013 12:40 PM, Leo Singer wrote:
On Jun 14, 2013, at 10:00:42 AM PDT, bl...@orcaware.com wrote:
On 06/14/2013 08:49 AM, Jack Howarth wrote:
Can someone clarify what the situation is with Java and MacPorts? On fink,
we have a number
of packages (like graphviz) which previously hav
On 2013-6-15 06:23 , Ryan Schmidt wrote:
>
> And in fact a variable name can contain a dot. We use them all the time, like
> ${configure.args}, but the use of the curly braces is necessary to tell Tcl
> to include them in the variable name.
Of course when I wrote "variable name" I meant an unqu
On Jun 14, 2013, at 09:32, Joshua Root wrote:
>> Revision: 106996
>> https://trac.macports.org/changeset/106996
>> Author: larryv at macports.org
>> Date: 2013-06-13 09:42:06 -0700 (Thu, 13 Jun 2013)
>> Log Message:
>> ---
>> macports.tcl: Restore braces for variable subst
On Jun 14, 2013, at 13:50, Jeremy Lavergne wrote:
> Would it be worthwhile to record that an activation was forced so we can
> alert the user to run rev-upgrade after the second package is deactivated?
>
> A forced activation of a second package may not break the original package,
> so the use
On Jun 14, 2013, at 14:50, Jack Howarth wrote:
> On fink, we have some packages where all of the bells and whistles have been
> enabled (such as graphviz). I noticed that the MacPorts' java variant for
> graphviz depends on swig-java which in turn seems to use kaffe (which seems
> rather archiac
On Fri, Jun 14, 2013 at 10:00:42AM -0700, Blair Zajac wrote:
> On 06/14/2013 08:49 AM, Jack Howarth wrote:
>> Can someone clarify what the situation is with Java and MacPorts? On
>> fink, we have a number
>> of packages (like graphviz) which previously have been built against the
>> JavaVM.fr
On Jun 14, 2013, at 10:00:42 AM PDT, bl...@orcaware.com wrote:
> On 06/14/2013 08:49 AM, Jack Howarth wrote:
>>Can someone clarify what the situation is with Java and MacPorts? On
>> fink, we have a number
>> of packages (like graphviz) which previously have been built against the
>> JavaVM.
On Jun 13, 2013, at 6:50 AM, mk-macpo...@techno.ms wrote:
> Have you a hint how to solve the INCLUDEPATH issue?
Found a solution in r107026.
___
macports-dev mailing list
macports-dev@lists.macosforge.org
https://lists.macosforge.org/mailman/listinfo/macp
Would it be worthwhile to record that an activation was forced so we can alert
the user to run rev-upgrade after the second package is deactivated?
A forced activation of a second package may not break the original package, so
the user may forget about the damage done and the inevitable cause of
On 06/14/2013 08:49 AM, Jack Howarth wrote:
Can someone clarify what the situation is with Java and MacPorts? On fink,
we have a number
of packages (like graphviz) which previously have been built against the
JavaVM.framework
in /System/Library/Frameworks. We had hoped to transition to the
Can someone clarify what the situation is with Java and MacPorts? On fink,
we have a number
of packages (like graphviz) which previously have been built against the
JavaVM.framework
in /System/Library/Frameworks. We had hoped to transition to the Oracle JDK for
this but
they both don't use a
> Revision: 106996
> https://trac.macports.org/changeset/106996
> Author: larryv at macports.org
> Date: 2013-06-13 09:42:06 -0700 (Thu, 13 Jun 2013)
> Log Message:
> ---
> macports.tcl: Restore braces for variable substitions immediately followed by
> other substitutions.
Hello,
On Jun 14, 2013, at 3:51 PM, Ryan Schmidt wrote:
>
> Does this commit cause any changes in the files the port installs? If not,
> the revision should not have been increased (but don't change it now).
There was a ticket mentioning that qtiplot was not necessarily employing the
right c
13 matches
Mail list logo
