On Jul 5, 2013, at 19:53, Mojca Miklavec wrote:
> Just a follow-up question then. Is the "MacPorts could fool its
> subservient programs into thinking they're running in a terminal" part
> something trivial or something complex to implement?
>
> If it is trivial to do, I would like to run it loc
On Fri, Jul 5, 2013 at 9:38 PM, Ryan Schmidt wrote:
>
> On Jul 5, 2013, at 09:27, Mojca Miklavec wrote:
>
>> I don't know how to achieve this, but it would be very nice if "port
>> -v build someport" would display output in colours for CMake-based
>> installations.
>>
>> How difficult would it be
On Jul 5, 2013, at 4:24 PM, Johannes Kastl wrote:
> I thought I would not need to create a ticket. ;-)
Tickets are almost always better for this sort of thing, as they are easily
queried, assigned, etc.
vq
___
macports-dev mailing list
macports-dev@l
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 7/5/13 9:39 PM Ryan Schmidt wrote:
> Could you please file a ticket in the issue tracker for this
> update?
Sure.
https://trac.macports.org/ticket/39643
I thought I would not need to create a ticket. ;-)
Regards,
Johannes
- --
The Alchemist's
On Jul 5, 2013, at 08:23, Johannes Kastl wrote:
> Virtualbox 4.2.14 has been out for some time, and yesterday the bugfix
> release 4.2.16 has been released. Could someone please upgrade the port?
Could you please file a ticket in the issue tracker for this update?
__
On Jul 5, 2013, at 09:27, Mojca Miklavec wrote:
> I don't know how to achieve this, but it would be very nice if "port
> -v build someport" would display output in colours for CMake-based
> installations.
>
> How difficult would it be to implement such a feature?
Usually, programs that can outp
Hi,
I don't know how to achieve this, but it would be very nice if "port
-v build someport" would display output in colours for CMake-based
installations.
How difficult would it be to implement such a feature?
Thank you,
Mojca
___
macports-dev mail
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi everyone,
Virtualbox 4.2.14 has been out for some time, and yesterday the bugfix
release 4.2.16 has been released. Could someone please upgrade the port?
> port info virtualbox virtualbox @4.2.12 (emulators) Sub-ports:
> virtualbox-guest-additions
On 2013-7-5 16:57 , Jeremy Huddleston Sequoia wrote:
> TBH, I’d rather switch to 5.16 while 5.18 matures in MacPorts ...
>
> So is anyone against moving from 5.12 to 5.16 as the default? Should we make
> changes to all the relevant ports at once?
Yes, they should all be changed at once. For per
