Re: Supported configurations once Mavericks is released

2013-09-25 Thread Lawrence Velázquez
On Sep 25, 2013, at 4:37 PM, Jeremy Lavergne wrote: > I also like the concept but the distinction of "tier 1: 64-bit unless only > 32-bit" seems a little odd at first glance. I know the exceptional reasons > are valid, conveying them to users on the other hand... > > Do you think there is a cl

Re: CMake warning wrt frameworks during configure phase on Snow Leopard

2013-09-25 Thread Ned Deily
In article , Chris Jones wrote: > > The suggested fix in http://bugs.python.org/issue14018 is "to manually fix > > the symlinks in /Developer/SDKs/MacOSX10.6.sdk ..." ! > > > > Hmmm... I don't know what and how to fix this. > > Any guide that is telling you to manually start fiddling with sy

Re: CMake warning wrt frameworks during configure phase on Snow Leopard

2013-09-25 Thread MK-MacPorts
On Sep 26, 2013, at 12:32 AM, Ryan Schmidt wrote: > The reason 3.2.6 is recommended and the default is because it is the last > free version of Xcode for Snow Leopard. Thanks for pointing this out, Ryan! ___ macports-dev mailing list macports-dev@lists

Re: CMake warning wrt frameworks during configure phase on Snow Leopard

2013-09-25 Thread Ryan Schmidt
On Sep 25, 2013, at 16:42, Chris Jones wrote: > Just a thought, but maybe updating to an Xcode 4 release, there is one for > OSX 10.6, would fix things … Any reason to stay on Xcode 3 ? Xcode 3.2.6 is the recommended version for Snow Leopard for MacPorts. It is the version our buildbot runs an

Re: CMake warning wrt frameworks during configure phase on Snow Leopard

2013-09-25 Thread MK-MacPorts
Hi Chris, On Sep 25, 2013, at 11:42 PM, Chris Jones wrote: > Any guide that is telling you to manually start fiddling with sym links in > system areas, is a guide you should stay away from. That's what I also thought... > Just a thought, but maybe updating to an Xcode 4 release, there is one for

Re: CMake warning wrt frameworks during configure phase on Snow Leopard

2013-09-25 Thread Chris Jones
Hi, > > The suggested fix in http://bugs.python.org/issue14018 is "to manually fix > the symlinks in /Developer/SDKs/MacOSX10.6.sdk …" ! > > Hmmm… I don't know what and how to fix this. Any guide that is telling you to manually start fiddling with sym links in system areas, is a guide you sho

Re: CMake warning wrt frameworks during configure phase on Snow Leopard

2013-09-25 Thread Jeremy Lavergne
And of course I do this backwards. touch todo.txt ln -s test todo.txt ln: todo.txt: File exists Sorry :-\ On Sep 25, 2013, at 5:39 PM, Jeremy Lavergne wrote: > To recreate a symlink, you remove the existing source (source points to > destination) then symlink it again. For example: > `ls -l /

Re: CMake warning wrt frameworks during configure phase on Snow Leopard

2013-09-25 Thread Jeremy Lavergne
I'd look for the existing symlinks and see what's going on (perhaps use `find` and set type to link and exec ls -l {} \;). You can see where they point and why they're wrong, if not highlighted already in the bug report. To recreate a symlink, you remove the existing source (source points to d

CMake warning wrt frameworks during configure phase on Snow Leopard

2013-09-25 Thread MK-MacPorts
Just by accident I've found on my Snow Leopard this warning in the log file of one of my ports: --- . . . :info:configure -- The C compiler identification is GNU 4.2.1 :info:configure -- The CXX compiler identification is GNU 4.2.1 :info:configure CMake Warning at /opt/macports-test/share/cmake-2

Re: Supported configurations once Mavericks is released

2013-09-25 Thread Eric Gallager
Yes, Apple is still sending out security updates for 10.6; I just got one the other day (because I'm still on Snow Leopard). On Wed, Sep 25, 2013 at 4:31 PM, Daniel J. Luke wrote: > On Sep 25, 2013, at 4:20 PM, Jeremy Huddleston Sequoia < > jerem...@macports.org> wrote: > > I would like to ope

Re: Supported configurations once Mavericks is released

2013-09-25 Thread Jeff Snider
I think there was one last Monday. 2013-004. Looks like they keep a KB article up to date with a list of updates here: http://support.apple.com/kb/HT1222. On Sep 25, 2013, at 3:40 PM, Jeremy Lavergne wrote: > Yes they are, actually! > > On Sep 25, 2013, at 4:31 PM, Daniel J. Luke wrote: >

Re: Supported configurations once Mavericks is released

2013-09-25 Thread Jeremy Lavergne
Yes they are, actually! On Sep 25, 2013, at 4:31 PM, Daniel J. Luke wrote: > I still think current + one previous (and best effort for before that) is > reasonable. Is Apple even still sending out security updates for 10.6? ___ macports-dev mailing li

Re: Supported configurations once Mavericks is released

2013-09-25 Thread Jeremy Lavergne
I also like the concept but the distinction of "tier 1: 64-bit unless only 32-bit" seems a little odd at first glance. I know the exceptional reasons are valid, conveying them to users on the other hand... Do you think there is a clearer way we could present this distinction? I'm sure you've go

Re: Supported configurations once Mavericks is released

2013-09-25 Thread Bradley Giesbrecht
On Sep 25, 2013, at 1:20 PM, Jeremy Huddleston Sequoia wrote: > I would like to open a discussion about what configurations we intend to list > as supported with the release of Mavericks. Currently, our webpage states: > """ > We provide a single software tree that attempts to track the latest

Re: Supported configurations once Mavericks is released

2013-09-25 Thread Daniel J. Luke
On Sep 25, 2013, at 4:20 PM, Jeremy Huddleston Sequoia wrote: > I would like to open a discussion about what configurations we intend to list > as supported with the release of Mavericks. > > Thoughts? I still think current + one previous (and best effort for before that) is reasonable. Is A

Supported configurations once Mavericks is released

2013-09-25 Thread Jeremy Huddleston Sequoia
I would like to open a discussion about what configurations we intend to list as supported with the release of Mavericks. Currently, our webpage states: """ We provide a single software tree that attempts to track the latest release of every software title (port) we distribute, without splitting

Re: Tcl version compatibility

2013-09-25 Thread Clemens Lang
Hi, On Wed, Sep 25, 2013 at 12:12:53PM -0700, Bradley Giesbrecht wrote: > Does anyone more familiar with tcl or MP base's build system have any > light to shed? Yes, I do. The problem is caused by MacPorts overriding Tcl's internal try statement (that's new to 8.6 and thus didn't cause any proble

Re: gsoc13-tests: src/macports1.0 errors

2013-09-25 Thread Marius Coțofană
On Sep 25, 2013, at 10:22 PM, Bradley Giesbrecht wrote: > On Sep 25, 2013, at 2:47 AM, Joshua Root wrote: > >> On 2013-9-25 10:39 , Bradley Giesbrecht wrote: >>> >>> On Sep 24, 2013, at 10:00 AM, Bradley Giesbrecht wrote: >>> On Sep 24, 2013, at 9:39 AM, Joshua Root wrote: > On

Re: gsoc13-tests: src/macports1.0 errors

2013-09-25 Thread Bradley Giesbrecht
On Sep 25, 2013, at 2:47 AM, Joshua Root wrote: > On 2013-9-25 10:39 , Bradley Giesbrecht wrote: >> >> On Sep 24, 2013, at 10:00 AM, Bradley Giesbrecht wrote: >> >>> On Sep 24, 2013, at 9:39 AM, Joshua Root wrote: >>> On 2013-9-25 01:56 , Bradley Giesbrecht wrote: > $ sw_vers -productV

Re: Tcl version compatibility

2013-09-25 Thread Bradley Giesbrecht
On Sep 25, 2013, at 11:01 AM, Gustaf Neumann wrote: > since tcl 8.5 compiles fine on Mac OS X 10.4 or 10.5, i still think, that > shipping MacPorts with a private version of Tcl (as source and/or binary) > gives most freedom (as discussed earlier). I have MP tcl 8.6 built in a prefix (/opt

Re: Tcl version compatibility

2013-09-25 Thread Bradley Giesbrecht
On Sep 25, 2013, at 11:01 AM, Gustaf Neumann wrote: > Am 25.09.13 12:38, schrieb Rainer Müller: >>> Am 24.09.13 18:39, schrieb Joshua Root: >>> On 2013-9-25 01:56 , Bradley Giesbrecht wrote: > $ sw_vers -productVersion > 10.5.8 > $ make test > ... > ===> making tes

Re: Tcl version compatibility

2013-09-25 Thread Clemens Lang
On Wed, Sep 25, 2013 at 08:01:18PM +0200, Gustaf Neumann wrote: > i guess the wiki page is not correct Sorry, that was my fault while reformatting the page. It seems to be fixed now. -- Clemens Lang ___ macports-dev mailing list macports-dev@lists.mac

Re: Tcl version compatibility

2013-09-25 Thread Gustaf Neumann
Am 25.09.13 12:38, schrieb Rainer Müller: Am 24.09.13 18:39, schrieb Joshua Root: On 2013-9-25 01:56 , Bradley Giesbrecht wrote: $ sw_vers -productVersion 10.5.8 $ make test ... ===> making test in src/macports1.0 /usr/bin/tclsh ./tests/test.tcl -nocolor extra characters after close-brace

recipe for building base with MP tcl

2013-09-25 Thread Bradley Giesbrecht
Is there a recipe for building base with MP tcl? I have tried building tcl with MP in a /opt/macports-test prefix; then build base with /opt/local prefix using tcl from /opt/macports-test: $ CC=gcc-4.2 TCLSH=/opt/macports-test/bin/tclsh ./configure --prefix=/opt/local --with-tcl=/opt/macports-

Tcl version compatibility (was: Re: gsoc13-tests: src/macports1.0 errors)

2013-09-25 Thread Rainer Müller
On 2013-09-25 10:50, Gustaf Neumann wrote: > Am 24.09.13 18:39, schrieb Joshua Root: >> On 2013-9-25 01:56 , Bradley Giesbrecht wrote: >>> $ sw_vers -productVersion >>> 10.5.8 >>> $ make test >>> ... >>> ===> making test in src/macports1.0 >>> /usr/bin/tclsh ./tests/test.tcl -nocolor >>> extra char

Re: gsoc13-tests: src/macports1.0 errors

2013-09-25 Thread Joshua Root
On 2013-9-25 10:39 , Bradley Giesbrecht wrote: > > On Sep 24, 2013, at 10:00 AM, Bradley Giesbrecht wrote: > >> On Sep 24, 2013, at 9:39 AM, Joshua Root wrote: >> >>> On 2013-9-25 01:56 , Bradley Giesbrecht wrote: $ sw_vers -productVersion 10.5.8 $ make test ... ===> maki

Re: gsoc13-tests: src/macports1.0 errors

2013-09-25 Thread Gustaf Neumann
Am 24.09.13 18:39, schrieb Joshua Root: On 2013-9-25 01:56 , Bradley Giesbrecht wrote: $ sw_vers -productVersion 10.5.8 $ make test ... ===> making test in src/macports1.0 /usr/bin/tclsh ./tests/test.tcl -nocolor extra characters after close-brace while executing "set pwd [eval file join {*

Re: gsoc13-tests: src/macports1.0 errors

2013-09-25 Thread Rainer Müller
On 2013-09-25 02:39, Bradley Giesbrecht wrote: > > On Sep 24, 2013, at 10:00 AM, Bradley Giesbrecht wrote: > >> On Sep 24, 2013, at 9:39 AM, Joshua Root wrote: >> >>> On 2013-9-25 01:56 , Bradley Giesbrecht wrote: $ sw_vers -productVersion 10.5.8 $ make test ... ===> maki

Re: [111054] trunk/base/src/port1.0/portconfigure.tcl

2013-09-25 Thread Lawrence Velázquez
On Sep 22, 2013, at 2:46 PM, Rainer Müller wrote: > On 2013-09-14 03:12, lar...@macports.org wrote: >> --- trunk/base/src/port1.0/portconfigure.tcl 2013-09-14 00:55:38 UTC (rev >> 111053) >> +++ trunk/base/src/port1.0/portconfigure.tcl 2013-09-14 01:12:32 UTC (rev >> 111054) >> @@ -51,11 +51,11