Re: Maverics/Xcode 5 proposal: no more xcode-select --install

2013-10-29 Thread Ned Deily
In article <50ac6a3d-a11c-4215-ad99-a4b61312f...@angellane.org>, Paul Bennett wrote: > Is 'xcode-select --install' really necessary on Mavericks? > > I propose that it isn't, and we should consider a port that fails to build > without as a bug. > > Why? > > Xcode 5 installs command-line shim

Re: Maverics/Xcode 5 proposal: no more xcode-select --install

2013-10-29 Thread Rainer Müller
On 2013-10-29 22:54, Paul Bennett wrote: > On 29 Oct 2013, at 20:52, Clemens Lang wrote: > >> On Tue, Oct 29, 2013 at 08:47:29PM +, Paul Bennett wrote: >>> Is 'xcode-select --install' really necessary on Mavericks? >> >> Without xcode-select --install, /usr/lib/tclConfig.sh does not exist and

Re: Maverics/Xcode 5 proposal: no more xcode-select --install

2013-10-29 Thread Rainer Müller
On 2013-10-29 21:47, Paul Bennett wrote: > Xcode 5 installs command-line shims for the toolchain. These invoke the > relevant actual tools in the SDK directories. So it's possible to install > many (most?) ports without 'xcode-select --install'. What that command does > do is put in place copies

Re: Maverics/Xcode 5 proposal: no more xcode-select --install

2013-10-29 Thread Paul Bennett
On 29 Oct 2013, at 20:52, Clemens Lang wrote: > On Tue, Oct 29, 2013 at 08:47:29PM +, Paul Bennett wrote: >> Is 'xcode-select --install' really necessary on Mavericks? > > Without xcode-select --install, /usr/lib/tclConfig.sh does not exist and > MacPorts base currently fails to configure be

Re: Maverics/Xcode 5 proposal: no more xcode-select --install

2013-10-29 Thread Clemens Lang
On Tue, Oct 29, 2013 at 08:47:29PM +, Paul Bennett wrote: > Is 'xcode-select --install' really necessary on Mavericks? Without xcode-select --install, /usr/lib/tclConfig.sh does not exist and MacPorts base currently fails to configure because it cannot find Tcl. We could discuss whether we co

Maverics/Xcode 5 proposal: no more xcode-select --install

2013-10-29 Thread Paul Bennett
Is 'xcode-select --install' really necessary on Mavericks? I propose that it isn't, and we should consider a port that fails to build without as a bug. Why? Xcode 5 installs command-line shims for the toolchain. These invoke the relevant actual tools in the SDK directories. So it's possible to

Re: TextMate2 on Lion

2013-10-29 Thread Clemens Lang
On Tue, Oct 29, 2013 at 07:51:09PM +0100, Mojca Miklavec wrote: > # clang 3.2 - clang-3.4 and all clangs from Xcode < 5 crash while > compiling > this. This is empirical data – I actually tried this and it crashes somewhere in llvm. I should probably have reported this to the llvm developers, but

Re: TextMate2 on Lion

2013-10-29 Thread Mojca Miklavec
On Tue, Oct 29, 2013 at 6:57 PM, Ryan Schmidt wrote: > On Oct 29, 2013, at 06:32, Mojca Miklavec wrote: > >> (I wonder why other clangs compiled with >> macports don't work - I didn't test, I just read the comments), > > Where? Here (devel/capnproto/Portfile): # clang 3.2 - clang-3.4 and all clan

Re: [112690] trunk/dports/textproc

2013-10-29 Thread Ryan Schmidt
On Oct 29, 2013, at 09:31, h...@macports.org wrote: > Revision > 112690 > Author > h...@macports.org > Date > 2013-10-29 07:31:31 -0700 (Tue, 29 Oct 2013) > Log Message > > New port: stanford-parser @ 3.2.0 - a Java implementation of probabilistic > natural language parsers. > Added Paths > >

Re: [112692] trunk/dports/textproc

2013-10-29 Thread Ryan Schmidt
On Oct 29, 2013, at 10:10, h...@macports.org wrote: > Revision > 112692 > Author > h...@macports.org > Date > 2013-10-29 08:10:10 -0700 (Tue, 29 Oct 2013) > Log Message > > New port: expgram @ 0.2.0 - an ngram toolkit with succinct storage. > Added Paths > > • trunk/dports/textproc/expgra

Re: [112694] trunk/dports/textproc

2013-10-29 Thread Ryan Schmidt
On Oct 29, 2013, at 10:14, h...@macports.org wrote: > Revision > 112694 > Author > h...@macports.org > Date > 2013-10-29 08:14:23 -0700 (Tue, 29 Oct 2013) > Log Message > > New port: cicada @ 0.3.0 - a hypergraph-based toolkit for statistical machine > translation. > Added Paths > > • tr

Re: TextMate2 on Lion

2013-10-29 Thread Ryan Schmidt
On Oct 29, 2013, at 06:32, Mojca Miklavec wrote: > is it possible to compile TextMate2 on Lion? The textmate2 port claims to work on Lion and later, yes. > The capnproto port itself can successfully be compiled with > macports-gcc-4.7 for example Not a viable solution. We don’t want to mix C++

Re: Status of Macports_Framework

2013-10-29 Thread Mark Anderson
I figured out what I did. The link in the wiki points to the wrong spot. I'll go fix that when I have a chance. I knew I had built something much more recent than 6 years ago last time I built Pallet. Thanks everybody. —Mark ___ Mark E. Anderson On Tue, Oct 29, 2013 at 6:50

Re: Status of Macports_Framework

2013-10-29 Thread Mark Anderson
Ok, thanks, I thought their had to be. I must be looking in the wrong spot. —Mark ___ Mark E. Anderson On Mon, Oct 28, 2013 at 11:54 PM, Joshua Root wrote: > On 2013-10-29 14:36 , Mark Anderson wrote: > > What's the status of Macports_Framework? I was looking in SVN and th

TextMate2 on Lion

2013-10-29 Thread Mojca Miklavec
Hello, is it possible to compile TextMate2 on Lion? The capnproto port itself can successfully be compiled with macports-gcc-4.7 for example (I wonder why other clangs compiled with macports don't work - I didn't test, I just read the comments), but then it throws errors when including capnproto

Re: Status of Macports_Framework

2013-10-29 Thread Rainer Müller
On 2013-10-29 04:54, Joshua Root wrote: > On 2013-10-29 14:36 , Mark Anderson wrote: >> What's the status of Macports_Framework? I was looking in SVN and the >> last commit was 6 years ago. I was looking to work on it, is that the >> latest? > > I haven't tried it lately, but there have definitely