Re: [112830] trunk/dports/java/maven-devel/Portfile

2013-11-02 Thread Ryan Schmidt
On Nov 2, 2013, at 16:39, Frank Schima wrote: > > On Nov 2, 2013, at 8:17 AM, easie...@macports.org wrote: > >> # Symlink maven into the bin directory >> >> -system "cd ${destroot}${prefix}/bin && ln -s >> ../share/java/${name}/bin/mvn mvn3" >> >> +system "cd ${destroot}${prefix}

Re: [112830] trunk/dports/java/maven-devel/Portfile

2013-11-02 Thread Frank Schima
On Nov 2, 2013, at 8:17 AM, easie...@macports.org wrote: > Revision > 112830 > Author > easie...@macports.org > Date > 2013-11-02 07:17:50 -0700 (Sat, 02 Nov 2013) > Log Message > > Update to apache-maven-3.1.1. > > Change the install path to the more recognizable 'apache-maven-3.1.1' > instea

Re: [112836] trunk/dports/_resources/port1.0/group/cmake-1.0.tcl

2013-11-02 Thread Ryan Schmidt
On Nov 2, 2013, at 12:13, jerem...@macports.org wrote: > Revision > 112836 > Author > jerem...@macports.org > Date > 2013-11-02 10:13:52 -0700 (Sat, 02 Nov 2013) > Log Message > > Improve the CMake PortGroup so that it handles the configure.*flags. (#40648) > > The configure.cppflags, configure

Re: [112834] trunk/dports/x11/xorg-server/Portfile

2013-11-02 Thread Ryan Schmidt
On Nov 2, 2013, at 11:39, jerem...@macports.org wrote: > Revision > 112834 > Author > jerem...@macports.org > Date > 2013-11-02 09:39:12 -0700 (Sat, 02 Nov 2013) > Log Message > > xorg-server: Bump to 1.14.4 and address #38993 > > > patchfiles \ > > + 0001-XQuartz-Bump-bundle-version-to

Re: [112828] trunk/dports/_resources/port1.0/group/crossgcc-1.0.tcl

2013-11-02 Thread Ryan Schmidt
On Nov 2, 2013, at 07:33, rai...@macports.org wrote: > Revision > 112828 > Author > rai...@macports.org > Date > 2013-11-02 05:32:59 -0700 (Sat, 02 Nov 2013) > Log Message > > Make configure.cxx_stdlib optional as our buildbots do not know about this > option yet It’s not just our buildbots th

Fwd: Maintainership of perforce port

2013-11-02 Thread Gregor Jasny
Hello, The current maintainer is no longer interested in maintaining the perforce port and agreed that I take over. Could anyone please add the "maintainer" tag to #39242 or submit the patch? https://trac.macports.org/ticket/39242 Thanks, Gregor Original Message Subject: Re

Re: local PortGroup repo?

2013-11-02 Thread Rainer Müller
On 2013-11-01 21:02, Dan Ports wrote: > On Fri, Nov 01, 2013 at 03:21:36PM -0400, Eric Gallager wrote: >> Really? That's strange, I could've sworn I was able to use the qmake >> portgroup in my local PortFile repository successfully when I was testing >> it... > > I believe portfiles will use port