It does. So a user affected by that problem will either realize they need to
install tk with +x11, or they won’t know what to do and will file a bug report
or email me, like someone did today.
On Feb 17, 2014, at 09:52, Aljaž 'g5pw' Srebrnič wrote:
> I see. I thought the crash happened to all
I see. I thought the crash happened to all the users with magic installed
without tk +x11.
On 17 febbraio 2014 at 16:26:40, Ryan Schmidt (ryandes...@macports.org) wrote:
The reason I didn’t revbump is that this doesn’t change the files installed by
the magic ports at all. The only users who wou
The reason I didn’t revbump is that this doesn’t change the files installed by
the magic ports at all. The only users who would be affected by the crash at
launch are those who have already installed the port but have never tried to
launch it; that’s probably not of users, and I’m happy to field
Won’t this require a revbump?
On 17 febbraio 2014 at 15:50:46, ryandes...@macports.org
(ryandes...@macports.org) wrote:
Revision
117137
Author
ryandes...@macports.org
Date
2014-02-17 06:49:57 -0800 (Mon, 17 Feb 2014)
Log Message
magic, magic-devel: require +x11 variant of tk to avoid crash on l
On 2014-2-17 18:21 , mk-macpo...@techno.ms wrote:
> Hi Josh,
>
> On 17 Feb 2014, at 07:35 , Joshua Root wrote:
>> You don't have to sync your ports tree with svn just because you're
>> using the trunk version of base.
> Oh, I see!
> :)
>
> That means I misunderstood Clemens’ statement:
>
> On 1
On 2014-02-16 22:23, mk-macpo...@techno.ms wrote:
> There is still one big problem with all of this, which is that a ton of
> daemons and agents might be running as root or as another user for a given
> MacPorts installation.
It's not only the daemons running, but also the symlinks in the
direct
