Daniel J. Luke writes:
> On Mar 4, 2014, at 6:15 PM, Clemens Lang wrote:
>>
>> since I've done quite some base development since the last release I figured
>> I'd chime in and offer my opinion.
>>
>> Releasing the stdlib changes is certainly a good idea IMO. However, I'd
>> argue we should
Shree?
-Bill
On Mar 5, 2014, at 2:09 PM, Peter Danecek wrote:
>
> Hi,
> Trac is no very responsive here. Is there some real issue?
> ~petr
>
> ___
> macports-dev mailing list
> macports-dev@lists.macosforge.org
> https://lists.macosforge.org/mailma
Hi,
Trac is no very responsive here. Is there some real issue?
~petr
___
macports-dev mailing list
macports-dev@lists.macosforge.org
https://lists.macosforge.org/mailman/listinfo/macports-dev
On Mar 4, 2014, at 6:15 PM, Clemens Lang wrote:
>
> since I've done quite some base development since the last release I figured
> I'd chime in and offer my opinion.
>
> Releasing the stdlib changes is certainly a good idea IMO. However, I'd argue
> we should drop the check currently present i
IIRC there were supposed to be regular (annual?) portmgr elections to make sure
the people on it were ones the community of committers wanted, and to make sure
they were people who had enough time to dedicate to the project.
If we've got portmgr members who don't have time, to review committer
