Re: perl (again)

2014-06-10 Thread Mark Anderson
I sadly have not had enough time to work on cpan-mp, I've been mostly learning the internals of macports first. But yeah, like I said on that other thread, the latest perl is enough. Back when 5.x stalled because everyone thought 6 was coming out it was ok to stay still. But now we get new Perls re

Re: [MacPorts] #43480: perl: remove subrelease number from lib path

2014-06-10 Thread Mark Anderson
I (and I think Daniel Luke) just want to abolish all but the latest Perl. We allow the installing of perls that have LONG since gone out of updates. Perl goes out of its way to be backwards compatable. You have to do things like "use 5.16" to even use new features that break stuff. Mark —Mark ___

Re: perl (again)

2014-06-10 Thread Mojca Miklavec
On Tue, Jun 10, 2014 at 8:37 PM, Daniel J. Luke wrote: > On Jun 10, 2014, at 2:21 PM, Mojca Miklavec wrote: >> >> I would be really grateful if someone would be >> willing to look into the above mentioned ticket. We would need a >> slight modification of the configure/build scripts. > > That change

Re: OS and Xcode versions on buildbots

2014-06-10 Thread David Evans
On 6/10/14 3:11 PM, Joshua Root wrote: > On 2014-6-11 08:06 , David Evans wrote: >> Can anyone state authoritatively which OS version and versions of Xcode >> are currently being used on each of the MacPorts buildbots? Is this >> documented anywhere? Do we have a stated policy on this matter and

Re: OS and Xcode versions on buildbots

2014-06-10 Thread Joshua Root
On 2014-6-11 08:06 , David Evans wrote: > Can anyone state authoritatively which OS version and versions of Xcode > are currently being used on each of the MacPorts buildbots? Is this > documented anywhere? Do we have a stated policy on this matter and an > implementation mechanism? Should be th

OS and Xcode versions on buildbots

2014-06-10 Thread David Evans
Can anyone state authoritatively which OS version and versions of Xcode are currently being used on each of the MacPorts buildbots? Is this documented anywhere? Do we have a stated policy on this matter and an implementation mechanism? I'm asking because I'm seeing different results between some

Re: perl (again)

2014-06-10 Thread Daniel J. Luke
On Jun 10, 2014, at 2:21 PM, Mojca Miklavec wrote: > > I would be really grateful if someone would be > willing to look into the above mentioned ticket. We would need a > slight modification of the configure/build scripts. That change seems reasonable to me, but it would be worthwhile to look a

Re: perl (again)

2014-06-10 Thread Mojca Miklavec
On Tue, Jun 10, 2014 at 7:20 PM, Frank Schima wrote: > > 1. We need a perl5.20 port. Difficulty: ? > > It would be really nice if the perl5.X ports could be merged into a single > Portfile with subports so that new perl versions would be relatively easy to > add. All of the current perl ports seem

Re: perl (again)

2014-06-10 Thread Daniel J. Luke
On Jun 10, 2014, at 1:20 PM, Frank Schima wrote: > > On Jun 8, 2014, at 8:26 PM, Daniel J. Luke wrote: >> so, perl5.20 is out (and the new/current latest stable version)... >> >> any chance we can get a little less crazy and just ship the 'current' perl >> (instead of being perpetually behind)

Re: certsync: Please test patches on systems < 10.9

2014-06-10 Thread Joshua Root
The new version builds and appears to work correctly on 10.6. But see below regarding 10.5. On 2014-6-6 09:08 , Clemens Lang wrote: >> Leopard: >> >> certsync.m:162: warning: implicit declaration of function >> ‘SecPolicyCreateBasicX509’ > > I've provided an alternative implementation of the same

Re: perl (again)

2014-06-10 Thread Frank Schima
On Jun 8, 2014, at 8:26 PM, Daniel J. Luke wrote: > so, perl5.20 is out (and the new/current latest stable version)... > > any chance we can get a little less crazy and just ship the 'current' perl > (instead of being perpetually behind)? The current issues are: 1. We need a perl5.20 port. D

New committers: sicherha, khindenburg, dtakahashi, dstrubbe

2014-06-10 Thread Joshua Root
Please join us in welcoming the following new MacPorts committers: - Christoph Erhardt (sicherha) - Kurt Hindenburg (khindenburg) - Daisuke Takahashi (dtakahashi) - David Strubbe (dstrubbe) We look forward to continued excellent contributions from these new team members. - Joshua, Rainer, an

Re: KDE3

2014-06-10 Thread Nicolas Pavillon
Hello, On Jun5, 2014, at 21:34, Eric Gallager wrote: > Of those ports you mention, I currently only have kchmviewer installed > on my current machine, which I installed while testing different > chm-viewing applications. I generally use the Chmox port for those > purposes now though. Are you

Re: [120845] trunk/dports

2014-06-10 Thread Marcus Calhoun-Lopez
Thanks for pointing this out. Is it best to revert the unnecessary changes or simply note the problem for future reference? -Marcus On Jun 9, 2014, at 6:37 PM, Ryan Schmidt wrote: > On Jun 9, 2014, at 4:14 PM, mcalh...@macports.org wrote: > >> Revision >> 120845 >> Author >> mcalh...@macports