clang 3.5 build fails on Mavericks

Hi, I am surprised to see clang 5.3 failing to build on OSX 10.9.4, as I thought it is stable. Greets, Marko [1] https://trac.macports.org/ticket/44937 ___ macports-dev mailing list macports-dev@lists.macosforge.org https://lists.macosforge.org/mailm

Tickets #44777 p5-xml-twig

Hi, Could someone take a look at ticket #44777 . I updated the port to 3.48 (two patches). Thanks, Joël Brogniart signature.asc Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail ___ macports-dev mailing

Misleading behavior of "port uninstall --follow-dependencies" with multiple ports (Was: Misleading behavior of "port uninstall --follow-dependents" with multiple ports)

On Sep 10, 2014, at 10:13 PM, Lawrence Velázquez wrote: > I don't particularly like the way this plays out: > > % sudo port uninstall --follow-dependencies installed > Password: > ---> Deactivating autoconf @2.69_2 > ---> Cleaning autoconf > ---> Uninstalling autoconf @2.69_2 > The foll

Misleading behavior of "port uninstall --follow-dependents" with multiple ports

I don't particularly like the way this plays out: % sudo port uninstall --follow-dependencies installed Password: ---> Deactivating autoconf @2.69_2 ---> Cleaning autoconf ---> Uninstalling autoconf @2.69_2 The following dependencies will be uninstalled: m4 @1.4.16_0 xz @5.0.5

Re: clang-3.6 installation requires also installation of llvm-3.5

On 10 Sep 2014, at 22:46 , Jeremy Huddleston Sequoia wrote: > ld64 supports a variant to use llvm-3.6 for LTO by default, so you may prefer > to set that. Yeah, I saw that and switched to that one. > Yes, llvm-3.5 hasn't been bumped to the final release, but it is pulling from > svn a few d

Re: clang-3.6 installation requires also installation of llvm-3.5

On 10 Sep 2014, at 22:34 , Lawrence Velázquez wrote: > LLVM 3.5 was released a few days ago (although Jeremy hasn't bumped the port > to the release version yet), while 3.6 is still very much in development. Oh, I see… Good to know, thanks. ___ macpor

Re: clang-3.6 installation requires also installation of llvm-3.5

ld64 supports a variant to use llvm-3.6 for LTO by default, so you may prefer to set that. Yes, llvm-3.5 hasn't been bumped to the final release, but it is pulling from svn a few days before the release, so there isn't really much different between it and final. I'll bump it soon because I kno

Re: clang-3.6 installation requires also installation of llvm-3.5

On Sep 10, 2014, at 4:22 PM, Marko Käning wrote: > I noticed that installing clang-3.6 requires also installation of llvm-3.5 > because dependency ld64 selects it as the default variant. ld64 and cctools use LLVM for libLTO and llvm-mc. > Confusing, but there might be a reason for that... > >

clang-3.6 installation requires also installation of llvm-3.5

I noticed that installing clang-3.6 requires also installation of llvm-3.5 because dependency ld64 selects it as the default variant. Confusing, but there might be a reason for that... Well, is it recommended to rather use version 3.5 ATM? ___ macports-

Re: llvm-config not found on OSX 10.9.4

Hi Lawrence, On 10 Sep 2014, at 17:28 , Lawrence Velázquez wrote: > This isn't a workaround, it's required and expected because *Xcode does not > provide LLVM*. oh, thanks for clarifying that! > LLVM is a set of (mostly static) libraries used to build compilers. Clang / > Apple's "LLVM Compil

maintainer activity?

Hi Marcus, I came across some of the tickets you own [1] and which you never acknowledged, but saw that you still was active within the last month. So I am wondering if you retired or still active to some extend. Are you still interested in all the ports you maintain? Or would you like other t

Re: llvm-config not found on OSX 10.9.4

On Sep 10, 2014, at 3:18 AM, Joshua Root wrote: > On 2014-9-10 17:02 , Marko Käning wrote: >> Hi Ryan, >> >> On 10 Sep 2014, at 08:56 , Ryan Schmidt wrote: >>> On Sep 10, 2014, at 1:27 AM, Marko Käning wrote: >>> Well, we're missing llvm-config. :) I agree Apple does not provide such an >>> ex

Re: llvm-config not found on OSX 10.9.4

> On Sep 10, 2014, at 2:02 AM, Marko Käning wrote: > >> Well, we're missing llvm-config. :) I agree Apple does not provide such an >> executable. I don't know why. You could ask Apple. > > oh, so what could be done to work around it? > > Would their cmake build system have to try to find ever

Re: llvm-config not found on OSX 10.9.4

On 2014-9-10 17:02 , Marko Käning wrote: > Hi Ryan, > > On 10 Sep 2014, at 08:56 , Ryan Schmidt wrote: >> On Sep 10, 2014, at 1:27 AM, Marko Käning wrote: >> Well, we're missing llvm-config. :) I agree Apple does not provide such an >> executable. I don't know why. You could ask Apple. > > oh,

Re: llvm-config not found on OSX 10.9.4

Hi Ryan, On 10 Sep 2014, at 08:56 , Ryan Schmidt wrote: > On Sep 10, 2014, at 1:27 AM, Marko Käning wrote: > Well, we're missing llvm-config. :) I agree Apple does not provide such an > executable. I don't know why. You could ask Apple. oh, so what could be done to work around it? Would their