On 2014-10-13 03:11, Lawrence Velázquez wrote:
Note that, as Ryan and I found out in #45274, GNU Make (at least) doesn't
sequentially run command-line goals to completion if it's told to operate in
parallel. So there's no guarantee that the clean target will finish before
the all target
On Oct 13, 2014, at 7:41 AM, Brandon Allbery allber...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Oct 13, 2014 at 8:33 AM, Mark Brethen mark.bret...@gmail.com wrote:
If a user tries to install port ${name} how should this be handled?
That depends on what exactly you're trying to do. Obvious possibilities
On Oct 13, 2014, at 9:44 AM, Mark Brethen wrote:
On Oct 13, 2014, at 7:41 AM, Brandon Allbery wrote:
On Mon, Oct 13, 2014 at 8:33 AM, Mark Brethen wrote:
If a user tries to install port ${name} how should this be handled?
That depends on what exactly you're trying to do. Obvious
On Oct 12, 2014, at 6:30 PM, Mark Brethen wrote:
On Oct 12, 2014, at 4:23 PM, Mark Brethen wrote:
I'm breaking up an svn into different subports. It would save download time
if I can checkout only the directories needed from the repository for each
subport. Can you give multiple URLs for
On Oct 12, 2014, at 3:16 PM, Mark Brethen wrote:
How does one setup a portfile to do a 'make clean' before a 'make all'? I
thought of using
pre-build {
system -W ${somedir} ${build.cmd} clean
}
Usually one doesn't want to do this, but in the unusual situation where
On Oct 13, 2014, at 4:10 PM, Ryan Schmidt ryandes...@macports.org wrote:
Why do you need to fetch from multiple URLs?
The repository contains files for windows, linux, etc. (everything but the
kitchen sink) which is unnecessary for macports (the install takes an hour
because I'm limited to
On Oct 12, 2014, at 4:04 PM, Davide Liessi wrote:
Dear MacPorts developers,
in the next update to the Portfile for Frescobaldi, I'm going to
remove the python26 variant (in the way suggested in [1]).
At the moment the program supports only Python 2.7, but we are
planning to support Python 3
On Oct 13, 2014, at 4:15 PM, Mark Brethen wrote:
On Oct 13, 2014, at 4:10 PM, Ryan Schmidt wrote:
Why do you need to fetch from multiple URLs?
The repository contains files for windows, linux, etc. (everything but the
kitchen sink) which is unnecessary for macports (the install takes an
On Oct 13, 2014, at 5:27 PM, Ryan Schmidt ryandes...@macports.org wrote:
On Oct 13, 2014, at 4:15 PM, Mark Brethen wrote:
On Oct 13, 2014, at 4:10 PM, Ryan Schmidt wrote:
Why do you need to fetch from multiple URLs?
The repository contains files for windows, linux, etc. (everything but the
On Oct 13, 2014, at 4:47 PM, Daniel J. Luke dl...@geeklair.net wrote:
it may be worthwhile to step back and figure out why the port has to checkout
from svn at all. In general we should discourage (ab)using source control
repositories in this way. It's /much/ better to be able to get a
On Oct 10, 2014, at 9:05 AM, Daniel J. Luke wrote:
I disagree that we should move as many portgroups as possible into base.
Moving the portgroups out of base and into the ports tree years ago has been
of great benefit in encouraging the development of portgroups. No matter how
agile the
On Oct 13, 2014, at 5:54 PM, Ryan Schmidt ryandes...@macports.org wrote:
On Oct 10, 2014, at 9:05 AM, Daniel J. Luke wrote:
I disagree that we should move as many portgroups as possible into base.
Moving the portgroups out of base and into the ports tree years ago has
been of great
On Oct 13, 2014, at 5:00 PM, Daniel J. Luke wrote:
On Oct 13, 2014, at 5:54 PM, Ryan Schmidt wrote:
On Oct 10, 2014, at 9:05 AM, Daniel J. Luke wrote:
I disagree that we should move as many portgroups as possible into base.
Moving the portgroups out of base and into the ports tree years
On Oct 13, 2014, at 6:19 PM, Ryan Schmidt ryandes...@macports.org wrote:
On Oct 13, 2014, at 5:00 PM, Daniel J. Luke wrote:
On Oct 13, 2014, at 5:54 PM, Ryan Schmidt wrote:
On Oct 10, 2014, at 9:05 AM, Daniel J. Luke wrote:
I disagree that we should move as many portgroups as possible
On Oct 13, 2014, at 5:31 PM, Daniel J. Luke wrote:
On Oct 13, 2014, at 6:19 PM, Ryan Schmidt wrote:
There's no difference in the capabilities of code in a portgroup vs code in
a portfile.
portfiles are usually simpler than portgroups (almost by definition).
a portfile that looks like a
On Oct 13, 2014, at 9:33 PM, ctrelea...@macports.org wrote:
Revision
126702
Author
ctrelea...@macports.org
Date
2014-10-13 19:33:00 -0700 (Mon, 13 Oct 2014)
Log Message
libdvdread: update to 5.0.0, new master_site
Modified Paths
• trunk/dports/devel/libdvdread/Portfile
@@
At 9:37 PM -0500 10/13/14, Ryan Schmidt wrote:
On Oct 13, 2014, at 9:33 PM, ctrelea...@macports.org wrote:
[...]
-configure.cmd ./autogen.sh
+configure.args-append --disable-silent-rules
Since you're no longer using configure.cmd ./autogen.sh, do you
still need depends_build
On Oct 13, 2014, at 6:51 PM, Ryan Schmidt ryandes...@macports.org wrote:
On Oct 13, 2014, at 5:31 PM, Daniel J. Luke wrote:
it seems like that is a problem with base/ and our dev documentation (or
lack of) which it would make sense to fix rather than work around it in that
way.
We
Note that subports' revisions must be bumped when they're moved to the
graveyard, otherwise upgrades won't be triggered.
https://trac.macports.org/changeset/126706
vq
On Oct 13, 2014, at 1:54 PM, m...@macports.org wrote:
Revision
126684
Author
m...@macports.org
Date
2014-10-13 10:54:58
19 matches
Mail list logo
