-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
On 06.01.2015 07:45 AM, Daniel J. Luke wrote:
> On Jan 5, 2015, at 10:51 PM, Mihai Moldovan
> wrote:
>> But, but, but! That sounds like work! And people™ are still using
>> those ports! (Seriously, we should consider if that is REALLY a
>> valid
On Jan 5, 2015, at 10:51 PM, Mihai Moldovan wrote:
> But, but, but! That sounds like work! And people™ are still using those
> ports! (Seriously, we should consider if that is REALLY a valid reason
> or just go with what mojca said. I'd be for removing the ports, but I'm
> not exactly authoritativ
Here's the diff attached in email.
On Mon, Jan 5, 2015 at 7:45 PM, MacPorts wrote:
> #46200: chromedriver @2.12_0: update to 2.13
> ---+
> Reporter: rockettj@…| Owner: macports-tickets@…
> Type: update| Status
On 05.01.2015 04:30 PM, Mojca Miklavec wrote:
> Are we still supporting Apache 1?
Not really. I mean, ryan has said often enough[1] that users should
switch to the (more widely) supported apache2 port.
> If yes, we should fix at least:
> - apache
> - mod_perl
> - p5-libapreq
> and maybe others (
On Jan 5, 2015, at 12:35 PM, ele...@macports.org wrote:
> Revision
> 131067
> Author
> ele...@macports.org
> Date
> 2015-01-05 11:35:53 -0800 (Mon, 05 Jan 2015)
> Log Message
>
> gtk-osx-application: upgrade to 2.0.7 (#46350)
> Modified Paths
>
> trunk/dports/devel/gtk-osx-application/Portfile
One issue with how SWIG is split up is that much of the wrapping code
logic is built in to the binary provided by "swig". Installing
"swig-python" just installs the headers & related data files used by
SWIG (which are necessary, but not sufficient). I'm not sure if Python
needs to be available duri
Hi,
Are we still supporting Apache 1?
If yes, we should fix at least:
- apache
- mod_perl
- p5-libapreq
and maybe others (livecheck doesn't work, versions are outdated,
Apache 1.3.42 was released in 2010, mod_perl doesn't build at all,
...).
If not, we should delete at least all those port + pos
On Fri, Jan 2, 2015 at 9:14 PM, Lawrence Velázquez wrote:
> On Jan 2, 2015, at 4:41 AM, Mojca Miklavec wrote:
>
>> I would be inclined towards making a variant that would install
>> version 4.6 rather than 5.0, so that users experiencing problems with
>> version 5 could quickly switch back to 4.6 w
