Re: [KDE/Mac] subport and keyword questions/suggestions

On Jan 29, 2015, at 3:59 AM, René J.V. Bertin wrote: > - Do the build slaves build the default variants of subports? Subports are simply ports that share code with the containing port so all processing of the derived "Portfile" is standard. Regards, Bradley Giesbrecht (pixilla) signature.

Re: subport and keyword questions/suggestions

On Feb 15, 2015, at 10:33 AM, Marko Käning wrote: >> I *think* that the mechanism that's currently in place to let client ports >> accept qt5-mac-devel instead of qt5-mac should also let them accept >> qt5-mac[-devel]-kde instead of qt5-mac, but that remains to be confirmed. > > Which mechani

Re: requested not set when package given to port but installed as dep

On Feb 15, 2015, at 2:02 PM, Marko Käning wrote: > Hi Brad, > > On 15 Feb 2015, at 22:45 , Bradley Giesbrecht wrote: > >> Is this a bug? >> >> $ port installed requested and \( name:^foo$ or name:^bar$ \) >> None of the specified ports are installed. >> $ sudo port install foo bar >> ---> C

Re: Wrong information displayed in some trac pages

On Feb 15, 2015, at 6:34 AM, Davide Liessi wrote: > Is there a way to fix that commit? Subversion commits are immutable as far as we're concerned, but I just did a reverse merge to restore the old history to the path in question. Please verify that py-python-poppler-qt4's history is now in the

Re: subport and keyword questions/suggestions

On Sunday February 15 2015 19:58:14 Mojca Miklavec wrote: Hi Mojca, > Example: perl5.16 and perl5.20 could be treated as "alternative_to" > and many applications that need Perl just as a runtime dependency > could happily use either one or the other. But for many ports it > *does* matter which one

Re: requested not set when package given to port but installed as dep

Hi Brad, On 15 Feb 2015, at 22:45 , Bradley Giesbrecht wrote: > Is this a bug? > > $ port installed requested and \( name:^foo$ or name:^bar$ \) > None of the specified ports are installed. > $ sudo port install foo bar > ---> Computing dependencies for foo > The following dependencies will be

requested not set when package given to port but installed as dep

Is this a bug? $ port installed requested and \( name:^foo$ or name:^bar$ \) None of the specified ports are installed. $ sudo port install foo bar ---> Computing dependencies for foo The following dependencies will be installed: bar Continue? [Y/n]: ---> Installing bar @0.0.0_0 ---> Activati

Re: [MacPorts] #46844: help2man: add support for perl5.{16,18,20}

Yeah. I think bumping it to 5.20 is the best idea, as we slowly move toward toward the goal of One Perl to Rule Them All. Or whatever we wind up doing. —Mark ___ Mark E. Anderson On Sun, Feb 15, 2015 at 1:34 PM, Mojca Miklavec wrote: > On Sat, Feb 14, 2015 at 5:07 AM, Ryan

Re: subport and keyword questions/suggestions

Hi, I'm not sure if I understood the question, but here's my naive attempt to answer ... On Thu, Jan 29, 2015 at 12:59 PM, René J.V. wrote: > > - Has a complementary feature (as in complementary colours) to the > replaced_by keyword ever been considered? A keyword that allows a port to > indica

Re: [MacPorts] #46844: help2man: add support for perl5.{16,18,20}

On Sat, Feb 14, 2015 at 5:07 AM, Ryan Schmidt wrote: > I also wouldn't have a problem with individual ports like help2man moving to > newer perl versions like 5.20. I don't feel that we need to wait and try to > do every single port at once, as that's likely to either not happen because > of the

Re: subport and keyword questions/suggestions

Hi René, only now I saw your post and I also wonder what the best approach would be... > - Do the build slaves build the default variants of subparts? Well, actually, I don’t know for sure. I’d say no, but I guess this needs to be tested, if no-one can tell us. ;-) > I *think* that the mechani

Re: libepoxy without xorg deps possible?

Hi David, On 15 Jan 2015, at 09:54 , David Evans wrote: > As it stands, it is designed to work with X11. As such, it depends on mesa > and > xorg-libX11. The rest of the dependencies are from mesa. > > See https://github.com/anholt/libepoxy/blob/master/README.md > > It's required by gtk3 in

Re: Wrong information displayed in some trac pages

Il 07/02/15 21.54, Joshua Root ha scritto: The file really was removed and then re-added. Is there a way to fix that commit? If there is, should we care about this or just ignore it? Best wishes. Davide ___