phonon for Qt5 in ticket #46552

2015-07-07 Thread Marko Käning
Hi again, On 07 Jul 2015, at 23:22 , René J.V. Bertin wrote: >> Right now I am struggling with phonon [1], since it doesn’t want to install >> itself with >> current qt5-mac on my system, but perhaps I better open a separate thread >> for that topic… > > That's simply because the mainstream Q

Re: qtN-kde port(s)

2015-07-07 Thread Marko Käning
Hi René, On 07 Jul 2015, at 23:22 , René J.V. Bertin wrote: > A specific file, either one installed anyway by Qt but in a location specific > to qt5-kde, > or something like a README or stub file that's specific to the port. ah, ok, so it would be up to you to create this specific file for the

Re: qtN-kde port(s)

2015-07-07 Thread René J . V . Bertin
On Tuesday July 07 2015 23:29:53 Marko Käning wrote: Hi Marko, > ah, ok, so it would be up to you to create this specific file for the qt5-kde > port… That would probably be the safer route, yes. > > Anyway, yes, this could benefit from some discussion, because evidently one > > would have t

Re: qtN-kde port(s)

2015-07-07 Thread René J . V . Bertin
On Tuesday July 07 2015 21:50:44 Marko Käning wrote: > > > > {{{ > > # preamble > > > > if {[file exists ${prefix}/some/fingerprint/for/qt5-kde]} { > >PortGroup qt5-kde 1.0 > > } else { > >PortGroup qt5-mac 1.0 > > } > > }}} > > I have no idea what this fingerprint would actually be.

Re: qtN-kde port(s)

2015-07-07 Thread Marko Käning
Dear qt*-maintainers/interested, On 06 Jul 2015, at 10:00 , René J.V. Bertin wrote: > I think that can only be done by modifying the Qt PortGroup files so that > they detect the install layout and adapt the variable definitions they serve > accordingly. The cleanest approach I can think of (tak

Re: Python34 include directory problems

2015-07-07 Thread Michael Dickens
On Mon, Jul 6, 2015, at 03:06 PM, Joshua Root wrote: > On 2015-7-7 04:45 , Michael Dickens wrote: > > I must have a short memory; I have no recollection of doing that commit. > > Thanks for the explanation of why the 'm' or 'u' or 'd' or whatever; I > > had forgotten that too. Reading through that

Re: octave-control configure fail

2015-07-07 Thread Michael Dickens
Yes, there would be no difference so long as gcc5+ uses libgcc or libgcc-devel (which they seem to do). The change actually works pretty well in my testing; in the pre-configure stage from octave-1.0.tcl, change the current "configure.env-append" to instead do: {{{ set GFORTRAN [glob ${prefix}/

Re: The status of Apache Tomcat

2015-07-07 Thread Clemens Lang
Hi, - On 7 Jul, 2015, at 10:27, Björn Raupach raup...@me.com wrote: > The ports for Apache Tomcat are pretty out of date. I found > https://trac.macports.org/ticket/28938 but did not get any replies. Does > anyone > know the reasoning behind it? I do Java development most of the time and it

The status of Apache Tomcat

2015-07-07 Thread Björn Raupach
Dear group, first timer here. Be nice ;) The ports for Apache Tomcat are pretty out of date. I found https://trac.macports.org/ticket/28938 but did not get any replies. Does anyone know the reasoning behind it? I do Java development most of the time and