Hi,
the ports.tar tarball on the rsync mirror is no longer being updated; it's
modification time is now over 10h ago. Can you please look into this?
See output from my cronjob that checks this:
- Forwarded Message -
> From: "Cron Daemon"
> To:
On Oct 11, 2015, at 11:14 AM, jerem...@macports.org wrote:
> Revision
> 141132
> Author
> jerem...@macports.org
> Date
> 2015-10-11 09:14:38 -0700 (Sun, 11 Oct 2015)
> Log Message
>
> apple-gcc42: Drop support on ElCap
On Oct 11, 2015, at 11:15 AM, jerem...@macports.org wrote:
> Revision
>
On Oct 10, 2015, at 5:08 AM, Mojca Miklavec wrote:
> The Trac seems to be no longer responding. Can you please look into the
> problem?
Trac is up again.
___
macports-dev mailing list
macports-dev@lists.macosforge.org
Hi,
I hate to ask that question and I'm not trying to suggest moving away
just yet, but what is our plan B in case of some critical server
failures?
While it is a bit annoying, it is certainly not critical if one or two
buildbots are broken and if there is nobody to set a new one for the
new OS.
The cmake PortGroup could use some attention to improve the way MacPorts'
mechanism for controlling build (compiler, linker) options interacts with
cmake's mechanism.
http://trac.macports.org/ticket/49108
My proposed change currently attached to that ticket turns out to be incomplete
On 12/10/15 16:25, Mojca Miklavec wrote:
On Mon, Oct 12, 2015 at 4:59 PM, Mark Anderson wrote:
I dunno, but it seems like we're easily the most active project on here.
Followed by XQuartz maybe.
Webkit seems to be hosted on Mac OS Forge as well and it seems
relatively active:
On Oct 12, 2015, at 10:16 AM, MacPorts wrote:
> #46157: freecad App wrapper
> -+
> Reporter: mschamschula@… | Owner: macports-tickets@…
> Type: enhancement | Status: new
> Priority:
On 2015-10-13 02:56 , Ryan Schmidt wrote:
>
> We have no plan B. Prior to May, we never felt like we needed one, since
> Apple's Mac OS Forge was reliable. I would like MacPorts to stay with Mac OS
> Forge, because it would be an extreme pain to try to move. We just need them
> to become
On Oct 12, 2015, at 4:49 AM, Mojca Miklavec wrote:
> I hate to ask that question and I'm not trying to suggest moving away
> just yet, but what is our plan B in case of some critical server
> failures?
>
> While it is a bit annoying, it is certainly not critical if one or two
> buildbots are
On 2015-10-13 02:25 , Mojca Miklavec wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 12, 2015 at 4:59 PM, Mark Anderson wrote:
>> I dunno, but it seems like we're easily the most active project on here.
>> Followed by XQuartz maybe.
>
> Webkit seems to be hosted on Mac OS Forge as well and it seems
> relatively active:
>
On Mon, Oct 12, 2015 at 4:59 PM, Mark Anderson wrote:
> I dunno, but it seems like we're easily the most active project on here.
> Followed by XQuartz maybe.
Webkit seems to be hosted on Mac OS Forge as well and it seems
relatively active:
https://www.webkit.org/meeting/
A few other projects
On Sun, Oct 11, 2015, at 01:49 PM, Ryan Schmidt wrote:
> On Oct 11, 2015, at 10:15 AM, michae...@macports.org wrote:
> > gr-fosphor: add a patch to fix finding Freetype2 headers, for those having
> > issues (e.g., in 10.11).
> Can you tell me more about this problem?
Hi Ryan - Sure. gr-fosphor
I dunno, but it seems like we're easily the most active project on here.
Followed by XQuartz maybe. All this down time certainly makes me nervous.
—Mark
___
Mark E. Anderson
On Mon, Oct 12, 2015 at 10:51 AM, Daniel J. Luke wrote:
> On Oct
> On Oct 10, 2015, at 10:39 AM, Ryan Schmidt wrote:
> On Oct 10, 2015, at 5:08 AM, Mojca Miklavec wrote:
>> The Trac seems to be no longer responding. Can you please look into the
>> problem?
>>
>> Another problem that we had for the past few weeks (before the trac
>>
Maybe related to this is an rsync error:
root@poppy-mbp:/opt/local/var/macports/distfiles# port -v sync && port -v
outdated
---> Updating the ports tree
Synchronizing local ports tree from rsync://rsync.macports.org/release/ports/
receiving file list ... rsync:
I can’t speak for anyone else, but that works for me :)
> On Oct 11, 2015, at 8:08 PM, Jeremy Huddleston Sequoia
> wrote:
>
> Ok, so if the set includes the union of "good" and "specified", we're all
> happy?
>
>> On Oct 11, 2015, at 13:25, Daniel J. Luke
On Oct 12, 2015, at 5:49 AM, Mojca Miklavec wrote:
> I hate to ask that question and I'm not trying to suggest moving away
> just yet, but what is our plan B in case of some critical server
> failures?
I believe portmgr has said that they’ve discussed it.
> Do we have a
> On Oct 11, 2015, at 23:15, Ryan Schmidt wrote:
>
> On Oct 11, 2015, at 11:14 AM, jerem...@macports.org wrote:
>
>> Revision
>> 141132
>> Author
>> jerem...@macports.org
>> Date
>> 2015-10-11 09:14:38 -0700 (Sun, 11 Oct 2015)
>> Log Message
>>
>> apple-gcc42: Drop
On 2015-10-13 04:49 , Jeremy Huddleston Sequoia wrote:
>
>> On Oct 11, 2015, at 23:15, Ryan Schmidt wrote:
>>
>> On Oct 11, 2015, at 11:14 AM, jerem...@macports.org wrote:
>>
>>> Revision
>>> 141132
>>> Author
>>> jerem...@macports.org
>>> Date
>>> 2015-10-11 09:14:38
On Mon, Oct 12, 2015 at 1:49 PM, Jeremy Huddleston Sequoia
wrote:
>
>> On Oct 11, 2015, at 23:15, Ryan Schmidt wrote:
>>
>> On Oct 11, 2015, at 11:14 AM, jerem...@macports.org wrote:
>>
>>> Revision
>>> 141132
>>> Author
>>> jerem...@macports.org
I have another question now in addition to these:
Why are there two pre-activate phases? The code I put in pre-activate gets
executed in proc-pre-org.macports.activate-activate-0 and
proc-pre-org.macports.activate-activate-1. (More below, from 'port install
xcrysden') For writing a warning, it
> On Oct 12, 2015, at 11:28, Joshua Root wrote:
>
> On Mon, Oct 12, 2015 at 1:49 PM, Jeremy Huddleston Sequoia
> wrote:
>>
>>> On Oct 11, 2015, at 23:15, Ryan Schmidt wrote:
>>>
>>> On Oct 11, 2015, at 11:14 AM,
I guess it might be worthwhile to collect all these issues on a dedicated wiki
page:
On 12 Oct 2015, at 16:46 , Daniel J. Luke wrote:
>> Subversion log importer not running: https://trac.macports.org/ticket/48758
>>
>> Snow Leopard builder registry corrupted:
>>
On Oct 12, 2015, at 4:01 PM, Marko Käning wrote:
> I guess it might be worthwhile to collect all these issues on a dedicated
> wiki page:
> ... although such page might be pretty useless if the trac-wiki is dead again
> ...
>
> But anyway, I am afraid such a central point where all these
> On Oct 12, 2015, at 4:11 PM, Ryan Schmidt wrote:
>
>
>> On Oct 12, 2015, at 12:25 PM, mm...@macports.org wrote:
>>
>> Revision
>> 141201
>> Author
>> mm...@macports.org
>> Date
>> 2015-10-12 10:25:29 -0700 (Mon, 12 Oct 2015)
>> Log Message
>>
>> ceres-solver:
Hi Ryan,
On 12 Oct 2015, at 23:10 , Ryan Schmidt wrote:
> No need for a separate wiki page. The server/hosting component in the issue
> tracker already serves that purpose.
>
> https://trac.macports.org/query?status=!closed=server/hosting
ah, yes, that’s sufficient,
On 2015-10-13 08:26 , Mark Moll wrote:
>
>> On Oct 12, 2015, at 4:11 PM, Ryan Schmidt wrote:
>>
>>
>>> On Oct 12, 2015, at 12:25 PM, mm...@macports.org wrote:
>>>
>>> Revision
>>> 141201
>>> Author
>>> mm...@macports.org
>>> Date
>>> 2015-10-12 10:25:29 -0700 (Mon, 12
On Oct 12, 2015, at 4:26 PM, Mark Moll wrote:
> On Oct 12, 2015, at 4:11 PM, Ryan Schmidt wrote:
>
>> On Oct 12, 2015, at 12:25 PM, mm...@macports.org wrote:
>>
>>> Revision
>>> 141201
>>> Author
>>> mm...@macports.org
>>> Date
>>> 2015-10-12 10:25:29 -0700 (Mon, 12 Oct 2015)
>>> Log Message
> On Oct 12, 2015, at 7:12 PM, jerem...@macports.org wrote:
>
> Revision
> 141211
> Author
> jerem...@macports.org
> Date
> 2015-10-12 17:12:02 -0700 (Mon, 12 Oct 2015)
> Log Message
>
> libgeier: Fix build failure and alow universal by using openssl instead of nss
> Modified Paths
>
> •
> On Oct 12, 2015, at 18:42, Ryan Schmidt wrote:
>
>
>> On Oct 12, 2015, at 7:12 PM, jerem...@macports.org wrote:
>>
>> Revision
>> 141211
>> Author
>> jerem...@macports.org
>> Date
>> 2015-10-12 17:12:02 -0700 (Mon, 12 Oct 2015)
>> Log Message
>>
>> libgeier: Fix
30 matches
Mail list logo