Le 09/10/2015 16:49, Rainer Müller a écrit :
Thanks for your work in porting and patching fail2ban!
You welcome. Thanks to you and other macports developpers for having
carefully checked and committed it.
I noticed some things while trying to set this up. I don't know if these
were introduced
> On Oct 13, 2015, at 10:38 PM, David Strubbe wrote:
>
> Would something like this be a good idea to prevent multiple definition? This
> could potentially be an issue with other nested portgroups too.
>
> Index: dports/_resources/port1.0/group/active_variants-1.1.tcl
>
Would something like this be a good idea to prevent multiple definition?
This could potentially be an issue with other nested portgroups too.
Index: dports/_resources/port1.0/group/active_variants-1.1.tcl
===
--- dports/_resources/por
> On Oct 13, 2015, at 09:55, Landon Fuller wrote:
>
>
> On Oct 12, 2015, at 14:14, Jeremy Huddleston Sequoia
> wrote:
>
>> Yes, and I was quite happy that the compilers failed to work in Yosemite,
>> allowing me to mark them as unavailable. Unfortunately, some life was
>> breathed into th
On 2015-10-14 13:04 , David Strubbe wrote:
> > - Why is pre-activate code executed twice?
>
> It isn't, two pre-activate procedures have been registered and they are
> each executed once.
>
>
> Well, I only put one block of code in active variants, as below. Why
> does it end up in t
Hi Josh,
Thanks for the response.
On Tue, Oct 13, 2015 at 8:26 PM, Joshua Root wrote:
> On 2015-10-14 04:53 , David Strubbe wrote:
> > Can anyone help me with these questions?
> >
> > In short, I am wondering:
> > - Why does 'port install xcrysden +x11' pass the variant +x11 to the
> > installa
On 2015-10-14 04:53 , David Strubbe wrote:
> Can anyone help me with these questions?
>
> In short, I am wondering:
> - Why does 'port install xcrysden +x11' pass the variant +x11 to the
> installation of tk only if BWidget is also not installed?
It passes the variant on during installation of de
> On Oct 12, 2015, at 5:54 PM, Joshua Root wrote:
>
> On 2015-10-13 08:26 , Mark Moll wrote:
>>
>>> On Oct 12, 2015, at 4:11 PM, Ryan Schmidt wrote:
>>>
>>>
On Oct 12, 2015, at 12:25 PM, mm...@macports.org wrote:
Revision
141201
Author
mm...@macports.org
D
Can anyone help me with these questions?
In short, I am wondering:
- Why does 'port install xcrysden +x11' pass the variant +x11 to the
installation of tk only if BWidget is also not installed?
- Why is pre-activate code executed twice?
Thanks,
David
On Mon, Oct 12, 2015 at 3:19 PM, David Strubb
I was deferring to someone else the re-tool for cmake. ;) There also
seem to be many patchfiles that you've been maintaining, which I
haven't tried to grok at all...
Thanks,
- Eric
On Tue, Oct 13, 2015 at 2:51 AM, Jeremy Huddleston Sequoia
wrote:
> Hey Eric,
>
> Last month, you mentioned rewri
On Oct 12, 2015, at 14:14, Jeremy Huddleston Sequoia
wrote:
> Yes, and I was quite happy that the compilers failed to work in Yosemite,
> allowing me to mark them as unavailable. Unfortunately, some life was
> breathed into them again, preventing them from slipping off to their well
> deser
As mentioned earlier, I updated base and the ports to defer dropping support
for these legacy compilers.
I also did an audit of the ports that are blacklisting clang and fixed a few
along the way to remove the blacklisting. It's not surprising that most of the
remainder are dead ports, over ha
Hey Eric,
Last month, you mentioned rewriting the llvm Portfile to use the cmake build
system. I think now might be an opportune time to do that in llvm-3.8. Have
you looked into that yet?
--Jeremy
> On Sep 3, 2015, at 10:10, Eric A. Borisch wrote:
>
> I'll defer on rewriting the portfile
13 matches
Mail list logo
