Re: portindex ignores (filters out) unchanged port

2015-12-27 Thread Clemens Lang
On Mon, Dec 28, 2015 at 12:35:17AM +0100, René J.V. Bertin wrote: > On Monday December 28 2015 00:11:28 Clemens Lang wrote: > > > and fix your directory naming first. If the Portfile provides > > kf5-kate, it should be in a kf5-kate directory. > > I'd just as well avoid having redundant informati

Re: portindex ignores (filters out) unchanged port

2015-12-27 Thread René J . V . Bertin
On Monday December 28 2015 00:11:28 Clemens Lang wrote: > and fix your directory naming first. If the Portfile provides kf5-kate, > it should be in a kf5-kate directory. I'd just as well avoid having redundant information in the paths; kf5-kate is already in the kf5 category/tree, so its portdi

Re: portindex ignores (filters out) unchanged port

2015-12-27 Thread Clemens Lang
Hello, On Sun, Dec 27, 2015 at 11:10:45PM +0100, René J.V. Bertin wrote: > I had a look at the PortIndex files, and while `portindex` claimed it > reused the existing kf5-kate entry, I actually found 2 entries for > kate. > So I tried a hunch: rather than having > kde/kate/Portfile -> port:kate >

Re: portindex ignores (filters out) unchanged port

2015-12-27 Thread Brandon Allbery
On Sun, Dec 27, 2015 at 5:10 PM, René J.V. wrote: > I renamed kf5/kate to kf5/kate5 to avoid having 2 port directories with > identical names. That defeats the purpose of organising the port repository > using the filesystem, but that's another topic. The usual use case is you are making a loca

Re: portindex ignores (filters out) unchanged port

2015-12-27 Thread René J . V . Bertin
On Sunday December 27 2015 12:28:30 Daniel J. Luke wrote: > On Dec 27, 2015, at 3:44 AM, René J.V. Bertin wrote: > > Any ideas? > > read the portindex code? debug what is going on on your system? I might do that one day, if no one has the answer handy. I had a look at the PortIndex files, and

Re: portindex ignores (filters out) unchanged port

2015-12-27 Thread Daniel J. Luke
On Dec 27, 2015, at 3:44 AM, René J.V. Bertin wrote: > Any ideas? read the portindex code? debug what is going on on your system? > Why does portindex reprocess portfiles with subports, btw? Is it because it > was too complicated to determine nothing changed in those files? (Storing a > hash f

portindex ignores (filters out) unchanged port

2015-12-27 Thread René J . V . Bertin
Hi, I'm seeing an issue with some of my recent KF5 ports where portindex doesn't reprocess them if unchanged (and not run with the -f option). That's intended behaviour I think, but not that they're removed from the PortIndex . This doesn't happen with all ports; I'm seeing it with kf5-kate (ht