> On Jan 23, 2016, at 14:08, Mojca Miklavec wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> Would it be possible to implement a way to use the cxx11 PortGroup
> without having to use libc++ as default stdlib? Maybe with an
> additional configuration like:
>PortGroup cxx11 1.0
>cxx.require_global_libc++ no
> (but wi
On Sun, Jan 24, 2016 at 6:20 AM, René J.V. wrote:
> A trip to single-user mode or into recovery mode to toggle an EFI setting,
> right?
csrutil {enable|disable} and reboot.
--
brandon s allbery kf8nh sine nomine associates
allber...@gmail.com
On Sunday January 24 2016 10:42:56 Vincent Habchi wrote:
> Except that it’s no longer possible to compress the build-in Applications
> with OS X 10.11 since Apple introduced SIP
> (http://arstechnica.com/apple/2015/09/os-x-10-11-el-capitan-the-ars-technica-review/8/#h1).
> Even root cannot modi
> Sure. And it is probably also very easy to introduce regressions that way if
> the #ifdefs aren't already in place.
Yeah, that’s right. Every cloud has its silver lining. Or the contrary for that
matter.
> It'll do the same with your /Applications directory or the entire /opt/local
> tree.
On Sunday January 24 2016 09:46:03 Vincent Habchi wrote:
>Except that you can use configure to detect what model of processor you’re
>running on, and then with a -D flag eliminate all the code that is not
>targeted for your CPU (via #ifdef/#ifndef).
Sure. And it is probably also very easy to in
> This typically doesn't take a lot of space, and no compiler option will
> remove the unused code in software that was meant to support different CPUs
> at runtime…
Except that you can use configure to detect what model of processor you’re
running on, and then with a -D flag eliminate all the
